Re: trunk broken?

[Olivier Billard <ol...@laposte.net>]

Antonio, (all,)

FYI, we won the fight, we'll be using 6.0.
Yes-s-s :).

I still presume that I was not the only one, however there is one less now !

--
Oliv_i_er


Antonio Gallardo wrote:
> Oliver, I think we will stay at 1.4 Thank your for your feedback. :)
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Antonio Gallardo.
> 
> Olivier Billard escribió:
>> Hello there,
>>
>> This is my humble case :), but we are planning to use Cocoon 2.2, and 
>> cannot decide (customer does) on Java version, that is strongly likely 
>> to be Java 1.4... Because our Cocoon application will be embedded into 
>> a bigger existing software architecture based/tested/deployed on Java 
>> 1.4.
>>
>> They are some cases where you cannot do it in another way, 
>> unfortunately, Antonio :)... I personally think (in a Cocoon user POV) 
>> that this should be planned, announced far before doing this, so users 
>> like me can plan for it and decide knowing the consequences.
>>
> 
> 
> 

Re: trunk broken?

[Grzegorz Kossakowski <gk...@apache.org>]

Olivier Billard pisze:
> Antonio, (all,)
> 
> FYI, we won the fight, we'll be using 6.0.
> Yes-s-s :).
> 
> I still presume that I was not the only one, however there is one less 
> now !

Thanks for saying that. This really convinces me to opt for Java 1.5 as minimal requirement for Cocoon in near future.

-- 
Grzegorz Kossakowski
http://reflectingonthevicissitudes.wordpress.com/