You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@struts.apache.org by lt...@pfs.com on 2002/01/07 17:53:13 UTC
RE: custom tags: IBM 1.3 JDK vs SUN 1.3 JDK -- SOLVED
In case anybody else runs into this, it's evidently a bug in the SUN 1.3
JDK.
http://groups.google.com/groups?th=dd4229956bceb2f4&rnum=1
Lee
-----Original Message-----
From: Torrence, Lee
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 10:38 AM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: custom tags: IBM 1.3 JDK vs SUN 1.3 JDK
I have a struts jsp page with a lot of custom tags; it compiles to around
40k. Under Win2k, when I set JAVA_HOME to run Tomcat 4.1 with the IBM 1.3
JDK, the page executes almost instantaneously, but when I set JAVA_HOME to
the Sun JDK 1.3.1, it takes about 5 seconds to load.
Does the IBM jdk handle the compilation differently (the compiled size is
about the same either way), or is there a switch that's on by default with
the IBM JDK that improves performance over the Sun JDK?
Lee Torrence
Re: custom tags: IBM 1.3 JDK vs SUN 1.3 JDK -- SOLVED
Posted by Shengmeng Liu <sm...@users.sourceforge.net>.
Hi,
Does it have anything to deal with the HotSpot capability of Sun 1.3 JDK?
Just my two cents,
Shengmeng Liu
----- Original Message -----
From: <lt...@pfs.com>
To: <st...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 12:53 AM
Subject: RE: custom tags: IBM 1.3 JDK vs SUN 1.3 JDK -- SOLVED
> In case anybody else runs into this, it's evidently a bug in the SUN 1.3
> JDK.
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?th=dd4229956bceb2f4&rnum=1
>
> Lee
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Torrence, Lee
> Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 10:38 AM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: custom tags: IBM 1.3 JDK vs SUN 1.3 JDK
>
>
> I have a struts jsp page with a lot of custom tags; it compiles to around
> 40k. Under Win2k, when I set JAVA_HOME to run Tomcat 4.1 with the IBM 1.3
> JDK, the page executes almost instantaneously, but when I set JAVA_HOME to
> the Sun JDK 1.3.1, it takes about 5 seconds to load.
>
> Does the IBM jdk handle the compilation differently (the compiled size is
> about the same either way), or is there a switch that's on by default with
> the IBM JDK that improves performance over the Sun JDK?
>
> Lee Torrence
>