You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bookkeeper.apache.org by Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> on 2014/06/30 14:12:42 UTC
Release 3.4.0
Hi folks,
Now that 4.2.3 is out, we should start thinking about getting 4.3.0
out. The dev cycle has been going for a long time now, and I think
there's enough new features in already to make a release. Once the
protobuf stuff goes in, we should put on a feature freeze and start
prepping a release.
Given that there are so many changes in 4.3.0, I think we should
explicitly mark it as a beta release, and leave the 4.2 branch as the
"stable" branch. I think it will take another release or two to get
4.3 to stable.
Opinions?
-Ivan
Re: Release 3.4.0
Posted by Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>.
Sure. I could do it.
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
> @Sijie, do you still have enough cycles to be release manager on this?
>
> -Ivan
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 06:28:10PM -0700, Sijie Guo wrote:
> > +1 for the plan.
> >
> > - Sijie
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Flavio Junqueira <
> > fpjunqueira@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for the plan. I like the idea of a beta release.
> > >
> > >
> > > -Flavio
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Monday, June 30, 2014 1:14 PM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Hi folks,
> > > >
> > > >Now that 4.2.3 is out, we should start thinking about getting 4.3.0
> > > >out. The dev cycle has been going for a long time now, and I think
> > > >there's enough new features in already to make a release. Once the
> > > >protobuf stuff goes in, we should put on a feature freeze and start
> > > >prepping a release.
> > > >
> > > >Given that there are so many changes in 4.3.0, I think we should
> > > >explicitly mark it as a beta release, and leave the 4.2 branch as the
> > > >"stable" branch. I think it will take another release or two to get
> > > >4.3 to stable.
> > > >
> > > >Opinions?
> > > >
> > > >-Ivan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
Re: Release 3.4.0
Posted by Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org>.
@Sijie, do you still have enough cycles to be release manager on this?
-Ivan
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 06:28:10PM -0700, Sijie Guo wrote:
> +1 for the plan.
>
> - Sijie
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Flavio Junqueira <
> fpjunqueira@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > +1 for the plan. I like the idea of a beta release.
> >
> >
> > -Flavio
> >
> >
> >
> > On Monday, June 30, 2014 1:14 PM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >Hi folks,
> > >
> > >Now that 4.2.3 is out, we should start thinking about getting 4.3.0
> > >out. The dev cycle has been going for a long time now, and I think
> > >there's enough new features in already to make a release. Once the
> > >protobuf stuff goes in, we should put on a feature freeze and start
> > >prepping a release.
> > >
> > >Given that there are so many changes in 4.3.0, I think we should
> > >explicitly mark it as a beta release, and leave the 4.2 branch as the
> > >"stable" branch. I think it will take another release or two to get
> > >4.3 to stable.
> > >
> > >Opinions?
> > >
> > >-Ivan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
RE: Release 3.4.0
Posted by Rakesh R <ra...@huawei.com>.
+1 lgtm. After the protobuf goes in, it would be good if gives a tentative date for the beta release.
-Rakesh
-----Original Message-----
From: Sijie Guo [mailto:guosijie@gmail.com]
Sent: 01 July 2014 06:58
To: bookkeeper-dev@zookeeper.apache.org; Flavio Junqueira
Subject: Re: Release 3.4.0
+1 for the plan.
- Sijie
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Flavio Junqueira < fpjunqueira@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> +1 for the plan. I like the idea of a beta release.
>
>
> -Flavio
>
>
>
> On Monday, June 30, 2014 1:14 PM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> >
> >
> >Hi folks,
> >
> >Now that 4.2.3 is out, we should start thinking about getting 4.3.0
> >out. The dev cycle has been going for a long time now, and I think
> >there's enough new features in already to make a release. Once the
> >protobuf stuff goes in, we should put on a feature freeze and start
> >prepping a release.
> >
> >Given that there are so many changes in 4.3.0, I think we should
> >explicitly mark it as a beta release, and leave the 4.2 branch as the
> >"stable" branch. I think it will take another release or two to get
> >4.3 to stable.
> >
> >Opinions?
> >
> >-Ivan
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: Release 3.4.0
Posted by Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>.
+1 for the plan.
- Sijie
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Flavio Junqueira <
fpjunqueira@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> +1 for the plan. I like the idea of a beta release.
>
>
> -Flavio
>
>
>
> On Monday, June 30, 2014 1:14 PM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> >
> >
> >Hi folks,
> >
> >Now that 4.2.3 is out, we should start thinking about getting 4.3.0
> >out. The dev cycle has been going for a long time now, and I think
> >there's enough new features in already to make a release. Once the
> >protobuf stuff goes in, we should put on a feature freeze and start
> >prepping a release.
> >
> >Given that there are so many changes in 4.3.0, I think we should
> >explicitly mark it as a beta release, and leave the 4.2 branch as the
> >"stable" branch. I think it will take another release or two to get
> >4.3 to stable.
> >
> >Opinions?
> >
> >-Ivan
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: Release 3.4.0
Posted by Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
+1 for the plan. I like the idea of a beta release.
-Flavio
On Monday, June 30, 2014 1:14 PM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>Hi folks,
>
>Now that 4.2.3 is out, we should start thinking about getting 4.3.0
>out. The dev cycle has been going for a long time now, and I think
>there's enough new features in already to make a release. Once the
>protobuf stuff goes in, we should put on a feature freeze and start
>prepping a release.
>
>Given that there are so many changes in 4.3.0, I think we should
>explicitly mark it as a beta release, and leave the 4.2 branch as the
>"stable" branch. I think it will take another release or two to get
>4.3 to stable.
>
>Opinions?
>
>-Ivan
>
>
>