You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "Slawomir Jaranowski (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/02/16 09:55:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (MNGSITE-480) IDE Codestyle vs Maven Checkstyle: a bossfight

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNGSITE-480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Slawomir Jaranowski updated MNGSITE-480:
----------------------------------------
    Attachment: Screenshot 2022-02-16 at 10.40.07.png

> IDE Codestyle vs Maven Checkstyle: a bossfight
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNGSITE-480
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNGSITE-480
>             Project: Maven Project Web Site
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Tamás Cservenák
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: Screenshot 2022-02-16 at 10.40.07.png
>
>
> Codestyle updated in MNGSITE-465 for Idea has discrepancies wrt checkstyle plugin rules.
>  
> Typical example:
> IDEA IDE reformat result:
> {noformat}
> StreamSupport.stream( iteratorSearchResponse.iterator().spliterator(), false )
>         .sorted( ArtifactInfo.VERSION_COMPARATOR ).forEach( ai -> {
>             artifactInfos.add( ai );
>             page.add( convert( ai, null ) );
>         } );
>  {noformat}
> But, checktyle:
> {noformat}
>  [ERROR] src/main/java/org/apache/maven/index/search/backend/indexer/internal/IndexerCoreSearchBackendImpl.java:[127,83] (blocks) LeftCurly: '{' at column 83 should be on a new line.{noformat}
> In short, for me it looks like our checkstyle is too rigid, unprepared for Java 8 lambdas? (as IMHO the code snippet above with curly on next line would look awkward).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)