You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@roller.apache.org by Greg Huber <gr...@gmail.com> on 2013/04/05 17:42:22 UTC
org.apache.tiles
Does any one know why roller uses a non standard version of tiles?
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.tiles</groupId>
<artifactId>tiles-core</artifactId>
<version>2.1.4</version>
</dependency>
It should be 2.0.6. I remember looking at this before and it would not
work with this version???
Cheers Greg.
Re: org.apache.tiles
Posted by Greg Huber <gr...@gmail.com>.
Glen,
Well, tiles goes with struts, generally its always better to use the
distributed jars (especially if you need to ask a question to the struts
guys). In the disto its 2.0.6.
Cheers Greg
On 5 April 2013 16:46, Glen Mazza <gl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why is 2.1.4 "non-standard"? Checking the site, they're already up to
> 2.2.2 as GA: http://tiles.apache.org/
>
> Glen
>
> On 04/05/2013 11:42 AM, Greg Huber wrote:
>
>> Does any one know why roller uses a non standard version of tiles?
>>
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.apache.tiles</**groupId>
>> <artifactId>tiles-core</**artifactId>
>> <version>2.1.4</version>
>> </dependency>
>>
>> It should be 2.0.6. I remember looking at this before and it would not
>> work with this version???
>>
>> Cheers Greg.
>>
>>
>
Re: org.apache.tiles
Posted by Greg Huber <gr...@gmail.com>.
Glen,
It works. It also brings the correct commons-digester, where as 2.1.4 uses
1.6 whist 2.0.6 uses 1.8.
Just remember to clear out the pre-compiled JSP's from the webapp work
directory.
Cheers Greg.
On 6 April 2013 20:34, Glen Mazza <gl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As long as you're willing to confirm the software works with 2.0.6, go
> ahead and revert it to that older version. There apparently is some value
> in remaining with the default (or, as you say, correct) version of Tiles
> defined with the Struts version we're using: http://stackoverflow.com/**
> questions/2191009/struts2-**with-tiles-2-1-or-2-2<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2191009/struts2-with-tiles-2-1-or-2-2>.
> Also, <http://stackoverflow.com/**questions/2191009/struts2-**
> with-tiles-2-1-or-2-2<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2191009/struts2-with-tiles-2-1-or-2-2>
> >**apparently Tiles 3 will be supported in the upcoming 2.3.9 version of
> Struts 2: http://stackoverflow.com/**questions/13337938/how-to-**
> integrate-struts-2-with-tiles-**3<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13337938/how-to-integrate-struts-2-with-tiles-3>
> .
>
> Glen
>
> On 04/06/2013 02:43 PM, Greg Huber wrote:
>
>> Glen,
>>
>> Reverting to the correct version 2.0.6, just needs clearing out the
>> compiled jsp's from the webapp work directory, as there is a tag
>> attributed
>> not supported in 2.0.6.
>>
>> Cheers Greg.
>>
>>
>> On 5 April 2013 17:44, Glen Mazza <gl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> OK, I indeed see that Tiles 2.0.6 is the default for Struts 2.3.8:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/****struts/struts2/tags/STRUTS_2_****<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**struts/struts2/tags/STRUTS_2_**>
>>> 3_8/pom.xml?revision=1422545&****view=markup<http://svn.**
>>> apache.org/viewvc/struts/**struts2/tags/STRUTS_2_3_8/pom.**
>>> xml?revision=1422545&view=**markup<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/struts/struts2/tags/STRUTS_2_3_8/pom.xml?revision=1422545&view=markup>
>>> >,
>>> and it looks like we've been upgrading our Tiles versions away from the
>>> default for quite some time now: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/****<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**>
>>> roller/trunk/pom.xml?r1=****915340&r2=917207&pathrev=****
>>> 917207&diff_format=h<http://**svn.apache.org/viewvc/roller/**
>>> trunk/pom.xml?r1=915340&r2=**917207&pathrev=917207&diff_**format=h<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/roller/trunk/pom.xml?r1=915340&r2=917207&pathrev=917207&diff_format=h>
>>> >
>>> .
>>>
>>> If there are bugs that would be fixed by reverting to it, that might be a
>>> good idea. But you're saying the opposite is the case, we are apparently
>>> now relying on 2.1.x functionality in our code that won't work with
>>> 2.0.6.
>>>
>>> Unless we see otherwise, I wouldn't automatically assume Struts 2 is so
>>> fragile that it can't work with more recent versions of Tiles, and would
>>> hate to have to upgrade one just to take advantage of a more recent
>>> version
>>> of the other. Tiles was spun off as a separate project so there is
>>> already
>>> a loose linkage between the two. If a more recent version than the
>>> default
>>> is shown to work with Struts2 *and* it has functionality we want to use,
>>> there shouldn't be a problem in us using it.
>>>
>>> Glen
>>>
>>> On 04/05/2013 12:14 PM, Greg Huber wrote:
>>>
>>> Glen,
>>>>
>>>> Trying it out with version 2.0.6 it gives this error?
>>>>
>>>> ERROR 2013-04-05 17:06:55,182 BasicTilesContainer:render - Error
>>>> rendering
>>>> tile
>>>> org.apache.tiles.util.****TilesIOException: ServletException including
>>>> path
>>>> '/WEB-INF/jsps/tiles/tiles-****tabbedpage.jsp'.
>>>> ...
>>>> ....
>>>>
>>>> Caused by: javax.servlet.****ServletException:
>>>> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
>>>> org.apache.tiles.jsp.taglib.****InsertAttributeTag.doFinally()****V
>>>> at
>>>> org.apache.jasper.runtime.****PageContextImpl.****
>>>> doHandlePageException(**
>>>> PageContextImpl.java:865)
>>>> at
>>>> org.apache.jasper.runtime.****PageContextImpl.****
>>>> handlePageException(**
>>>> PageContextImpl.java:794)
>>>> at
>>>> org.apache.jsp.WEB_002dINF.****jsps.tiles.tiles_****
>>>> 002dtabbedpage_jsp._**
>>>> jspService(tiles_****002dtabbedpage_jsp.java:178)
>>>>
>>>> ....
>>>>
>>>> roller is pretty much standard, so it should work.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers Greg.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5 April 2013 16:46, Glen Mazza <gl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Why is 2.1.4 "non-standard"? Checking the site, they're already up to
>>>>
>>>>> 2.2.2 as GA: http://tiles.apache.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> Glen
>>>>>
>>>>> On 04/05/2013 11:42 AM, Greg Huber wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Does any one know why roller uses a non standard version of tiles?
>>>>>
>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tiles</******groupId>
>>>>>> <artifactId>tiles-core</******artifactId>
>>>>>> <version>2.1.4</version>
>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It should be 2.0.6. I remember looking at this before and it would
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> work with this version???
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers Greg.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>
Re: org.apache.tiles
Posted by Glen Mazza <gl...@gmail.com>.
As long as you're willing to confirm the software works with 2.0.6, go
ahead and revert it to that older version. There apparently is some
value in remaining with the default (or, as you say, correct) version of
Tiles defined with the Struts version we're using:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2191009/struts2-with-tiles-2-1-or-2-2. Also,
<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2191009/struts2-with-tiles-2-1-or-2-2>apparently
Tiles 3 will be supported in the upcoming 2.3.9 version of Struts 2:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13337938/how-to-integrate-struts-2-with-tiles-3.
Glen
On 04/06/2013 02:43 PM, Greg Huber wrote:
> Glen,
>
> Reverting to the correct version 2.0.6, just needs clearing out the
> compiled jsp's from the webapp work directory, as there is a tag attributed
> not supported in 2.0.6.
>
> Cheers Greg.
>
>
> On 5 April 2013 17:44, Glen Mazza <gl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> OK, I indeed see that Tiles 2.0.6 is the default for Struts 2.3.8:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**struts/struts2/tags/STRUTS_2_**
>> 3_8/pom.xml?revision=1422545&**view=markup<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/struts/struts2/tags/STRUTS_2_3_8/pom.xml?revision=1422545&view=markup>,
>> and it looks like we've been upgrading our Tiles versions away from the
>> default for quite some time now: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**
>> roller/trunk/pom.xml?r1=**915340&r2=917207&pathrev=**917207&diff_format=h<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/roller/trunk/pom.xml?r1=915340&r2=917207&pathrev=917207&diff_format=h>
>> .
>>
>> If there are bugs that would be fixed by reverting to it, that might be a
>> good idea. But you're saying the opposite is the case, we are apparently
>> now relying on 2.1.x functionality in our code that won't work with 2.0.6.
>>
>> Unless we see otherwise, I wouldn't automatically assume Struts 2 is so
>> fragile that it can't work with more recent versions of Tiles, and would
>> hate to have to upgrade one just to take advantage of a more recent version
>> of the other. Tiles was spun off as a separate project so there is already
>> a loose linkage between the two. If a more recent version than the default
>> is shown to work with Struts2 *and* it has functionality we want to use,
>> there shouldn't be a problem in us using it.
>>
>> Glen
>>
>> On 04/05/2013 12:14 PM, Greg Huber wrote:
>>
>>> Glen,
>>>
>>> Trying it out with version 2.0.6 it gives this error?
>>>
>>> ERROR 2013-04-05 17:06:55,182 BasicTilesContainer:render - Error rendering
>>> tile
>>> org.apache.tiles.util.**TilesIOException: ServletException including path
>>> '/WEB-INF/jsps/tiles/tiles-**tabbedpage.jsp'.
>>> ...
>>> ....
>>>
>>> Caused by: javax.servlet.**ServletException: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
>>> org.apache.tiles.jsp.taglib.**InsertAttributeTag.doFinally()**V
>>> at
>>> org.apache.jasper.runtime.**PageContextImpl.**doHandlePageException(**
>>> PageContextImpl.java:865)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.jasper.runtime.**PageContextImpl.**handlePageException(**
>>> PageContextImpl.java:794)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.jsp.WEB_002dINF.**jsps.tiles.tiles_**002dtabbedpage_jsp._**
>>> jspService(tiles_**002dtabbedpage_jsp.java:178)
>>>
>>> ....
>>>
>>> roller is pretty much standard, so it should work.
>>>
>>> Cheers Greg.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5 April 2013 16:46, Glen Mazza <gl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Why is 2.1.4 "non-standard"? Checking the site, they're already up to
>>>> 2.2.2 as GA: http://tiles.apache.org/
>>>>
>>>> Glen
>>>>
>>>> On 04/05/2013 11:42 AM, Greg Huber wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Does any one know why roller uses a non standard version of tiles?
>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tiles</****groupId>
>>>>> <artifactId>tiles-core</****artifactId>
>>>>> <version>2.1.4</version>
>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>
>>>>> It should be 2.0.6. I remember looking at this before and it would not
>>>>> work with this version???
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers Greg.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
Re: org.apache.tiles
Posted by Greg Huber <gr...@gmail.com>.
Glen,
Reverting to the correct version 2.0.6, just needs clearing out the
compiled jsp's from the webapp work directory, as there is a tag attributed
not supported in 2.0.6.
Cheers Greg.
On 5 April 2013 17:44, Glen Mazza <gl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, I indeed see that Tiles 2.0.6 is the default for Struts 2.3.8:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**struts/struts2/tags/STRUTS_2_**
> 3_8/pom.xml?revision=1422545&**view=markup<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/struts/struts2/tags/STRUTS_2_3_8/pom.xml?revision=1422545&view=markup>,
> and it looks like we've been upgrading our Tiles versions away from the
> default for quite some time now: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**
> roller/trunk/pom.xml?r1=**915340&r2=917207&pathrev=**917207&diff_format=h<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/roller/trunk/pom.xml?r1=915340&r2=917207&pathrev=917207&diff_format=h>
> .
>
> If there are bugs that would be fixed by reverting to it, that might be a
> good idea. But you're saying the opposite is the case, we are apparently
> now relying on 2.1.x functionality in our code that won't work with 2.0.6.
>
> Unless we see otherwise, I wouldn't automatically assume Struts 2 is so
> fragile that it can't work with more recent versions of Tiles, and would
> hate to have to upgrade one just to take advantage of a more recent version
> of the other. Tiles was spun off as a separate project so there is already
> a loose linkage between the two. If a more recent version than the default
> is shown to work with Struts2 *and* it has functionality we want to use,
> there shouldn't be a problem in us using it.
>
> Glen
>
> On 04/05/2013 12:14 PM, Greg Huber wrote:
>
>> Glen,
>>
>> Trying it out with version 2.0.6 it gives this error?
>>
>> ERROR 2013-04-05 17:06:55,182 BasicTilesContainer:render - Error rendering
>> tile
>> org.apache.tiles.util.**TilesIOException: ServletException including path
>> '/WEB-INF/jsps/tiles/tiles-**tabbedpage.jsp'.
>> ...
>> ....
>>
>> Caused by: javax.servlet.**ServletException: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
>> org.apache.tiles.jsp.taglib.**InsertAttributeTag.doFinally()**V
>> at
>> org.apache.jasper.runtime.**PageContextImpl.**doHandlePageException(**
>> PageContextImpl.java:865)
>> at
>> org.apache.jasper.runtime.**PageContextImpl.**handlePageException(**
>> PageContextImpl.java:794)
>> at
>> org.apache.jsp.WEB_002dINF.**jsps.tiles.tiles_**002dtabbedpage_jsp._**
>> jspService(tiles_**002dtabbedpage_jsp.java:178)
>>
>> ....
>>
>> roller is pretty much standard, so it should work.
>>
>> Cheers Greg.
>>
>>
>> On 5 April 2013 16:46, Glen Mazza <gl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Why is 2.1.4 "non-standard"? Checking the site, they're already up to
>>> 2.2.2 as GA: http://tiles.apache.org/
>>>
>>> Glen
>>>
>>> On 04/05/2013 11:42 AM, Greg Huber wrote:
>>>
>>> Does any one know why roller uses a non standard version of tiles?
>>>>
>>>> <dependency>
>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tiles</****groupId>
>>>> <artifactId>tiles-core</****artifactId>
>>>> <version>2.1.4</version>
>>>> </dependency>
>>>>
>>>> It should be 2.0.6. I remember looking at this before and it would not
>>>> work with this version???
>>>>
>>>> Cheers Greg.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
Re: org.apache.tiles
Posted by Glen Mazza <gl...@gmail.com>.
OK, I indeed see that Tiles 2.0.6 is the default for Struts 2.3.8:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/struts/struts2/tags/STRUTS_2_3_8/pom.xml?revision=1422545&view=markup,
and it looks like we've been upgrading our Tiles versions away from the
default for quite some time now:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/roller/trunk/pom.xml?r1=915340&r2=917207&pathrev=917207&diff_format=h.
If there are bugs that would be fixed by reverting to it, that might be
a good idea. But you're saying the opposite is the case, we are
apparently now relying on 2.1.x functionality in our code that won't
work with 2.0.6.
Unless we see otherwise, I wouldn't automatically assume Struts 2 is so
fragile that it can't work with more recent versions of Tiles, and would
hate to have to upgrade one just to take advantage of a more recent
version of the other. Tiles was spun off as a separate project so there
is already a loose linkage between the two. If a more recent version
than the default is shown to work with Struts2 *and* it has
functionality we want to use, there shouldn't be a problem in us using it.
Glen
On 04/05/2013 12:14 PM, Greg Huber wrote:
> Glen,
>
> Trying it out with version 2.0.6 it gives this error?
>
> ERROR 2013-04-05 17:06:55,182 BasicTilesContainer:render - Error rendering
> tile
> org.apache.tiles.util.TilesIOException: ServletException including path
> '/WEB-INF/jsps/tiles/tiles-tabbedpage.jsp'.
> ...
> ....
>
> Caused by: javax.servlet.ServletException: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
> org.apache.tiles.jsp.taglib.InsertAttributeTag.doFinally()V
> at
> org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl.doHandlePageException(PageContextImpl.java:865)
> at
> org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl.handlePageException(PageContextImpl.java:794)
> at
> org.apache.jsp.WEB_002dINF.jsps.tiles.tiles_002dtabbedpage_jsp._jspService(tiles_002dtabbedpage_jsp.java:178)
>
> ....
>
> roller is pretty much standard, so it should work.
>
> Cheers Greg.
>
>
> On 5 April 2013 16:46, Glen Mazza <gl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Why is 2.1.4 "non-standard"? Checking the site, they're already up to
>> 2.2.2 as GA: http://tiles.apache.org/
>>
>> Glen
>>
>> On 04/05/2013 11:42 AM, Greg Huber wrote:
>>
>>> Does any one know why roller uses a non standard version of tiles?
>>>
>>> <dependency>
>>> <groupId>org.apache.tiles</**groupId>
>>> <artifactId>tiles-core</**artifactId>
>>> <version>2.1.4</version>
>>> </dependency>
>>>
>>> It should be 2.0.6. I remember looking at this before and it would not
>>> work with this version???
>>>
>>> Cheers Greg.
>>>
>>>
Re: org.apache.tiles
Posted by Greg Huber <gr...@gmail.com>.
Glen,
Trying it out with version 2.0.6 it gives this error?
ERROR 2013-04-05 17:06:55,182 BasicTilesContainer:render - Error rendering
tile
org.apache.tiles.util.TilesIOException: ServletException including path
'/WEB-INF/jsps/tiles/tiles-tabbedpage.jsp'.
...
....
Caused by: javax.servlet.ServletException: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.apache.tiles.jsp.taglib.InsertAttributeTag.doFinally()V
at
org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl.doHandlePageException(PageContextImpl.java:865)
at
org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl.handlePageException(PageContextImpl.java:794)
at
org.apache.jsp.WEB_002dINF.jsps.tiles.tiles_002dtabbedpage_jsp._jspService(tiles_002dtabbedpage_jsp.java:178)
....
roller is pretty much standard, so it should work.
Cheers Greg.
On 5 April 2013 16:46, Glen Mazza <gl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why is 2.1.4 "non-standard"? Checking the site, they're already up to
> 2.2.2 as GA: http://tiles.apache.org/
>
> Glen
>
> On 04/05/2013 11:42 AM, Greg Huber wrote:
>
>> Does any one know why roller uses a non standard version of tiles?
>>
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.apache.tiles</**groupId>
>> <artifactId>tiles-core</**artifactId>
>> <version>2.1.4</version>
>> </dependency>
>>
>> It should be 2.0.6. I remember looking at this before and it would not
>> work with this version???
>>
>> Cheers Greg.
>>
>>
>
Re: org.apache.tiles
Posted by Glen Mazza <gl...@gmail.com>.
Why is 2.1.4 "non-standard"? Checking the site, they're already up to
2.2.2 as GA: http://tiles.apache.org/
Glen
On 04/05/2013 11:42 AM, Greg Huber wrote:
> Does any one know why roller uses a non standard version of tiles?
>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.tiles</groupId>
> <artifactId>tiles-core</artifactId>
> <version>2.1.4</version>
> </dependency>
>
> It should be 2.0.6. I remember looking at this before and it would not
> work with this version???
>
> Cheers Greg.
>