You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@karaf.apache.org by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> on 2018/02/19 04:58:31 UTC
[HEADS UP] Preparing Apache Karaf 4.2.0 GA
Hi guys,
After 4.2.0.M1 & 4.2.0.M2, I think it's time to do the first 4.2.0 GA.
I have three actions on the way:
1. Upgrade to Pax Web 7 with Jetty 9.4 support. I started Pax Web/Jetty part on
a local branch. I hope to have something this week around that. It takes a
little bit of time because the Jetty API slightly changed (as usual). This point
is a blocker and 4.2.0 needs it. If you think it's worth to have a 4.2.0.M3 with
this update, please let me know.
2. Merge karaf-docker feature branch. It's something that we discussed days ago.
I updated and cleanup the code for donation. Not blocker but good to have.
3. Merge examples branch. In order to allow users to easily start with Karaf,
François and I are working on a set of examples
(https://github.com/jbonofre/karaf/tree/DEV_GUIDE/examples). The idea is to
include those examples in the Karaf distribution, linked them in the developer
guide. At the end, I would like to add itests using these examples as well,
allowing us to detect regression. Again not a blocker, but good to have. Please,
let me know what you are thinking about the examples. Some examples are in
development (take a look in the examples pom.xml for the list of examples).
Roughly, I would like to cut 4.2.0 in 2 weeks or so.
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [HEADS UP] Preparing Apache Karaf 4.2.0 GA
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
+1
Regards
JB
On 19/02/2018 09:02, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I'll release pax-jms and pax-cdi today and upgrade those.
>
> 2018-02-19 8:54 GMT+01:00 Grzegorz Grzybek <gr...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> 2018-02-19 8:05 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
>>
>>> Thanks for the update Grzegorz.
>>>
>>> I saw your changes, I'm not rebasing my branch and moving forward on this
>>> one.
>>>
>>> For PAX CDI, I would add a version range in the features <repository/>. I
>>> can help on this & release.
>>>
>>
>> Currently PAX-CDI doesn't have any <repository> link to pax-web. And to be
>> honest, I'd like to avoid having version ranges in <features>/<repository>
>> - I had one in CXF → PAX-CDI and ended with two pax-cdi feature
>> repositories in my custom Karaf distro...
>>
>> regards
>> Grzegorz Grzybek
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>>
>>> On 19/02/2018 07:56, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello
>>>>
>>>> I'm glad to hear about 4.2.0.GA!
>>>>
>>>> From my side - I've committed the changes I planned to pax-web 7.x and
>>>> 8.x
>>>> (master) - some interfaces changed and it could be done at major
>> increase.
>>>> Also, latest pax-web snapshots (6.0.10-SNAPSHOT, 6.1.2-SNAPSHOT,
>>>> 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT and 8.0.0-SNAPSHOT) *now* depend on pax-cdi
>> 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
>>>> (and partially vice versa - pax-cdi depends on pax-web 6.1.2-SNAPSHOT)
>>>> because of some changes related to CDI in (pax-)web environments.
>>>>
>>>> Before Karaf 4.2.0.GA, I'd like to have pax-cdi 1.0.0.GA released (or
>> at
>>>> least 1.0.0.RC3) with dependency on pax-web 6.0.10 (without explicit
>>>> <features>/<repository> tying to any particular version of pax-web).
>>>>
>>>> best regards
>>>> Grzegorz Grzybek
>>>>
>>>> 2018-02-19 5:58 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>
>>>>> After 4.2.0.M1 & 4.2.0.M2, I think it's time to do the first 4.2.0 GA.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have three actions on the way:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Upgrade to Pax Web 7 with Jetty 9.4 support. I started Pax Web/Jetty
>>>>> part on
>>>>> a local branch. I hope to have something this week around that. It
>> takes
>>>>> a
>>>>> little bit of time because the Jetty API slightly changed (as usual).
>>>>> This
>>>>> point
>>>>> is a blocker and 4.2.0 needs it. If you think it's worth to have a
>>>>> 4.2.0.M3 with
>>>>> this update, please let me know.
>>>>> 2. Merge karaf-docker feature branch. It's something that we discussed
>>>>> days ago.
>>>>> I updated and cleanup the code for donation. Not blocker but good to
>>>>> have.
>>>>> 3. Merge examples branch. In order to allow users to easily start with
>>>>> Karaf,
>>>>> François and I are working on a set of examples
>>>>> (https://github.com/jbonofre/karaf/tree/DEV_GUIDE/examples). The idea
>> is
>>>>> to
>>>>> include those examples in the Karaf distribution, linked them in the
>>>>> developer
>>>>> guide. At the end, I would like to add itests using these examples as
>>>>> well,
>>>>> allowing us to detect regression. Again not a blocker, but good to
>> have.
>>>>> Please,
>>>>> let me know what you are thinking about the examples. Some examples are
>>>>> in
>>>>> development (take a look in the examples pom.xml for the list of
>>>>> examples).
>>>>>
>>>>> Roughly, I would like to cut 4.2.0 in 2 weeks or so.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: [HEADS UP] Preparing Apache Karaf 4.2.0 GA
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org>.
I'll release pax-jms and pax-cdi today and upgrade those.
2018-02-19 8:54 GMT+01:00 Grzegorz Grzybek <gr...@gmail.com>:
> Hello
>
> 2018-02-19 8:05 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
>
> > Thanks for the update Grzegorz.
> >
> > I saw your changes, I'm not rebasing my branch and moving forward on this
> > one.
> >
> > For PAX CDI, I would add a version range in the features <repository/>. I
> > can help on this & release.
> >
>
> Currently PAX-CDI doesn't have any <repository> link to pax-web. And to be
> honest, I'd like to avoid having version ranges in <features>/<repository>
> - I had one in CXF → PAX-CDI and ended with two pax-cdi feature
> repositories in my custom Karaf distro...
>
> regards
> Grzegorz Grzybek
>
>
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> >
> > On 19/02/2018 07:56, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote:
> >
> >> Hello
> >>
> >> I'm glad to hear about 4.2.0.GA!
> >>
> >> From my side - I've committed the changes I planned to pax-web 7.x and
> >> 8.x
> >> (master) - some interfaces changed and it could be done at major
> increase.
> >> Also, latest pax-web snapshots (6.0.10-SNAPSHOT, 6.1.2-SNAPSHOT,
> >> 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT and 8.0.0-SNAPSHOT) *now* depend on pax-cdi
> 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> >> (and partially vice versa - pax-cdi depends on pax-web 6.1.2-SNAPSHOT)
> >> because of some changes related to CDI in (pax-)web environments.
> >>
> >> Before Karaf 4.2.0.GA, I'd like to have pax-cdi 1.0.0.GA released (or
> at
> >> least 1.0.0.RC3) with dependency on pax-web 6.0.10 (without explicit
> >> <features>/<repository> tying to any particular version of pax-web).
> >>
> >> best regards
> >> Grzegorz Grzybek
> >>
> >> 2018-02-19 5:58 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
> >>
> >> Hi guys,
> >>>
> >>> After 4.2.0.M1 & 4.2.0.M2, I think it's time to do the first 4.2.0 GA.
> >>>
> >>> I have three actions on the way:
> >>>
> >>> 1. Upgrade to Pax Web 7 with Jetty 9.4 support. I started Pax Web/Jetty
> >>> part on
> >>> a local branch. I hope to have something this week around that. It
> takes
> >>> a
> >>> little bit of time because the Jetty API slightly changed (as usual).
> >>> This
> >>> point
> >>> is a blocker and 4.2.0 needs it. If you think it's worth to have a
> >>> 4.2.0.M3 with
> >>> this update, please let me know.
> >>> 2. Merge karaf-docker feature branch. It's something that we discussed
> >>> days ago.
> >>> I updated and cleanup the code for donation. Not blocker but good to
> >>> have.
> >>> 3. Merge examples branch. In order to allow users to easily start with
> >>> Karaf,
> >>> François and I are working on a set of examples
> >>> (https://github.com/jbonofre/karaf/tree/DEV_GUIDE/examples). The idea
> is
> >>> to
> >>> include those examples in the Karaf distribution, linked them in the
> >>> developer
> >>> guide. At the end, I would like to add itests using these examples as
> >>> well,
> >>> allowing us to detect regression. Again not a blocker, but good to
> have.
> >>> Please,
> >>> let me know what you are thinking about the examples. Some examples are
> >>> in
> >>> development (take a look in the examples pom.xml for the list of
> >>> examples).
> >>>
> >>> Roughly, I would like to cut 4.2.0 in 2 weeks or so.
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> JB
> >>> --
> >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >>> jbonofre@apache.org
> >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
--
------------------------
Guillaume Nodet
Re: [HEADS UP] Preparing Apache Karaf 4.2.0 GA
Posted by Grzegorz Grzybek <gr...@gmail.com>.
Hello
2018-02-19 8:05 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
> Thanks for the update Grzegorz.
>
> I saw your changes, I'm not rebasing my branch and moving forward on this
> one.
>
> For PAX CDI, I would add a version range in the features <repository/>. I
> can help on this & release.
>
Currently PAX-CDI doesn't have any <repository> link to pax-web. And to be
honest, I'd like to avoid having version ranges in <features>/<repository>
- I had one in CXF → PAX-CDI and ended with two pax-cdi feature
repositories in my custom Karaf distro...
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 19/02/2018 07:56, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> I'm glad to hear about 4.2.0.GA!
>>
>> From my side - I've committed the changes I planned to pax-web 7.x and
>> 8.x
>> (master) - some interfaces changed and it could be done at major increase.
>> Also, latest pax-web snapshots (6.0.10-SNAPSHOT, 6.1.2-SNAPSHOT,
>> 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT and 8.0.0-SNAPSHOT) *now* depend on pax-cdi 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
>> (and partially vice versa - pax-cdi depends on pax-web 6.1.2-SNAPSHOT)
>> because of some changes related to CDI in (pax-)web environments.
>>
>> Before Karaf 4.2.0.GA, I'd like to have pax-cdi 1.0.0.GA released (or at
>> least 1.0.0.RC3) with dependency on pax-web 6.0.10 (without explicit
>> <features>/<repository> tying to any particular version of pax-web).
>>
>> best regards
>> Grzegorz Grzybek
>>
>> 2018-02-19 5:58 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> After 4.2.0.M1 & 4.2.0.M2, I think it's time to do the first 4.2.0 GA.
>>>
>>> I have three actions on the way:
>>>
>>> 1. Upgrade to Pax Web 7 with Jetty 9.4 support. I started Pax Web/Jetty
>>> part on
>>> a local branch. I hope to have something this week around that. It takes
>>> a
>>> little bit of time because the Jetty API slightly changed (as usual).
>>> This
>>> point
>>> is a blocker and 4.2.0 needs it. If you think it's worth to have a
>>> 4.2.0.M3 with
>>> this update, please let me know.
>>> 2. Merge karaf-docker feature branch. It's something that we discussed
>>> days ago.
>>> I updated and cleanup the code for donation. Not blocker but good to
>>> have.
>>> 3. Merge examples branch. In order to allow users to easily start with
>>> Karaf,
>>> François and I are working on a set of examples
>>> (https://github.com/jbonofre/karaf/tree/DEV_GUIDE/examples). The idea is
>>> to
>>> include those examples in the Karaf distribution, linked them in the
>>> developer
>>> guide. At the end, I would like to add itests using these examples as
>>> well,
>>> allowing us to detect regression. Again not a blocker, but good to have.
>>> Please,
>>> let me know what you are thinking about the examples. Some examples are
>>> in
>>> development (take a look in the examples pom.xml for the list of
>>> examples).
>>>
>>> Roughly, I would like to cut 4.2.0 in 2 weeks or so.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [HEADS UP] Preparing Apache Karaf 4.2.0 GA
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Thanks for the update Grzegorz.
I saw your changes, I'm not rebasing my branch and moving forward on
this one.
For PAX CDI, I would add a version range in the features <repository/>.
I can help on this & release.
Regards
JB
On 19/02/2018 07:56, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm glad to hear about 4.2.0.GA!
>
> From my side - I've committed the changes I planned to pax-web 7.x and 8.x
> (master) - some interfaces changed and it could be done at major increase.
> Also, latest pax-web snapshots (6.0.10-SNAPSHOT, 6.1.2-SNAPSHOT,
> 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT and 8.0.0-SNAPSHOT) *now* depend on pax-cdi 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> (and partially vice versa - pax-cdi depends on pax-web 6.1.2-SNAPSHOT)
> because of some changes related to CDI in (pax-)web environments.
>
> Before Karaf 4.2.0.GA, I'd like to have pax-cdi 1.0.0.GA released (or at
> least 1.0.0.RC3) with dependency on pax-web 6.0.10 (without explicit
> <features>/<repository> tying to any particular version of pax-web).
>
> best regards
> Grzegorz Grzybek
>
> 2018-02-19 5:58 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> After 4.2.0.M1 & 4.2.0.M2, I think it's time to do the first 4.2.0 GA.
>>
>> I have three actions on the way:
>>
>> 1. Upgrade to Pax Web 7 with Jetty 9.4 support. I started Pax Web/Jetty
>> part on
>> a local branch. I hope to have something this week around that. It takes a
>> little bit of time because the Jetty API slightly changed (as usual). This
>> point
>> is a blocker and 4.2.0 needs it. If you think it's worth to have a
>> 4.2.0.M3 with
>> this update, please let me know.
>> 2. Merge karaf-docker feature branch. It's something that we discussed
>> days ago.
>> I updated and cleanup the code for donation. Not blocker but good to have.
>> 3. Merge examples branch. In order to allow users to easily start with
>> Karaf,
>> François and I are working on a set of examples
>> (https://github.com/jbonofre/karaf/tree/DEV_GUIDE/examples). The idea is
>> to
>> include those examples in the Karaf distribution, linked them in the
>> developer
>> guide. At the end, I would like to add itests using these examples as well,
>> allowing us to detect regression. Again not a blocker, but good to have.
>> Please,
>> let me know what you are thinking about the examples. Some examples are in
>> development (take a look in the examples pom.xml for the list of examples).
>>
>> Roughly, I would like to cut 4.2.0 in 2 weeks or so.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>
Re: [HEADS UP] Preparing Apache Karaf 4.2.0 GA
Posted by Grzegorz Grzybek <gr...@gmail.com>.
Hello
I'm glad to hear about 4.2.0.GA!
From my side - I've committed the changes I planned to pax-web 7.x and 8.x
(master) - some interfaces changed and it could be done at major increase.
Also, latest pax-web snapshots (6.0.10-SNAPSHOT, 6.1.2-SNAPSHOT,
7.0.0-SNAPSHOT and 8.0.0-SNAPSHOT) *now* depend on pax-cdi 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
(and partially vice versa - pax-cdi depends on pax-web 6.1.2-SNAPSHOT)
because of some changes related to CDI in (pax-)web environments.
Before Karaf 4.2.0.GA, I'd like to have pax-cdi 1.0.0.GA released (or at
least 1.0.0.RC3) with dependency on pax-web 6.0.10 (without explicit
<features>/<repository> tying to any particular version of pax-web).
best regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
2018-02-19 5:58 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
> Hi guys,
>
> After 4.2.0.M1 & 4.2.0.M2, I think it's time to do the first 4.2.0 GA.
>
> I have three actions on the way:
>
> 1. Upgrade to Pax Web 7 with Jetty 9.4 support. I started Pax Web/Jetty
> part on
> a local branch. I hope to have something this week around that. It takes a
> little bit of time because the Jetty API slightly changed (as usual). This
> point
> is a blocker and 4.2.0 needs it. If you think it's worth to have a
> 4.2.0.M3 with
> this update, please let me know.
> 2. Merge karaf-docker feature branch. It's something that we discussed
> days ago.
> I updated and cleanup the code for donation. Not blocker but good to have.
> 3. Merge examples branch. In order to allow users to easily start with
> Karaf,
> François and I are working on a set of examples
> (https://github.com/jbonofre/karaf/tree/DEV_GUIDE/examples). The idea is
> to
> include those examples in the Karaf distribution, linked them in the
> developer
> guide. At the end, I would like to add itests using these examples as well,
> allowing us to detect regression. Again not a blocker, but good to have.
> Please,
> let me know what you are thinking about the examples. Some examples are in
> development (take a look in the examples pom.xml for the list of examples).
>
> Roughly, I would like to cut 4.2.0 in 2 weeks or so.
>
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
Re: [HEADS UP] Preparing Apache Karaf 4.2.0 GA
Posted by Grzegorz Grzybek <gr...@gmail.com>.
Hello again
I have:
- released pax-web 6.0.10
- upgraded pax-cdi master branch to depend on pax-web 6.0.10 (and fixed
some tests) - now pax-cdi builds fine - tests should be run (no idea why)
by "cd itest; mvn clean install"
So it's now possible to release pax-cdi (1.0.0.RC3 or just (finally!)
1.0.0) and then use 1.0.0 in pax-web 7.0.0
best regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
2018-02-19 11:17 GMT+01:00 Oliver Lietz <ap...@oliverlietz.de>:
> On Monday 19 February 2018 05:58:31 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Hi guys,
>
> Hi,
>
> > After 4.2.0.M1 & 4.2.0.M2, I think it's time to do the first 4.2.0 GA.
> >
> > I have three actions on the way:
> >
> > 1. Upgrade to Pax Web 7 with Jetty 9.4 support. I started Pax Web/Jetty
> part
> > on a local branch. I hope to have something this week around that. It
> takes
> > a little bit of time because the Jetty API slightly changed (as usual).
> > This point is a blocker and 4.2.0 needs it. If you think it's worth to
> have
> > a 4.2.0.M3 with this update, please let me know.
>
> +1 for M3 with Pax Web 7
>
> > 2. Merge karaf-docker feature branch. It's something that we discussed
> days
> > ago. I updated and cleanup the code for donation. Not blocker but good to
> > have. 3. Merge examples branch. In order to allow users to easily start
> > with Karaf, François and I are working on a set of examples
> > (https://github.com/jbonofre/karaf/tree/DEV_GUIDE/examples). The idea
> is to
> > include those examples in the Karaf distribution, linked them in the
> > developer guide. At the end, I would like to add itests using these
> > examples as well, allowing us to detect regression. Again not a blocker,
> > but good to have. Please, let me know what you are thinking about the
> > examples. Some examples are in development (take a look in the examples
> > pom.xml for the list of examples).
> >
> > Roughly, I would like to cut 4.2.0 in 2 weeks or so.
>
> Thanks, JB!
>
> O.
>
> > Regards
> > JB
>
>
Re: [HEADS UP] Preparing Apache Karaf 4.2.0 GA
Posted by Oliver Lietz <ap...@oliverlietz.de>.
On Monday 19 February 2018 05:58:31 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi guys,
Hi,
> After 4.2.0.M1 & 4.2.0.M2, I think it's time to do the first 4.2.0 GA.
>
> I have three actions on the way:
>
> 1. Upgrade to Pax Web 7 with Jetty 9.4 support. I started Pax Web/Jetty part
> on a local branch. I hope to have something this week around that. It takes
> a little bit of time because the Jetty API slightly changed (as usual).
> This point is a blocker and 4.2.0 needs it. If you think it's worth to have
> a 4.2.0.M3 with this update, please let me know.
+1 for M3 with Pax Web 7
> 2. Merge karaf-docker feature branch. It's something that we discussed days
> ago. I updated and cleanup the code for donation. Not blocker but good to
> have. 3. Merge examples branch. In order to allow users to easily start
> with Karaf, François and I are working on a set of examples
> (https://github.com/jbonofre/karaf/tree/DEV_GUIDE/examples). The idea is to
> include those examples in the Karaf distribution, linked them in the
> developer guide. At the end, I would like to add itests using these
> examples as well, allowing us to detect regression. Again not a blocker,
> but good to have. Please, let me know what you are thinking about the
> examples. Some examples are in development (take a look in the examples
> pom.xml for the list of examples).
>
> Roughly, I would like to cut 4.2.0 in 2 weeks or so.
Thanks, JB!
O.
> Regards
> JB
Re: [HEADS UP] Preparing Apache Karaf 4.2.0 GA
Posted by Andrea Cosentino <an...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
+1
Thanks JB!
--
Andrea Cosentino
----------------------------------
Apache Camel PMC Member
Apache Karaf Committer
Apache Servicemix PMC Member
Email: ancosen1985@yahoo.com
Twitter: @oscerd2
Github: oscerd
On Monday, February 19, 2018, 5:58:36 AM GMT+1, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
Hi guys,
After 4.2.0.M1 & 4.2.0.M2, I think it's time to do the first 4.2.0 GA.
I have three actions on the way:
1. Upgrade to Pax Web 7 with Jetty 9.4 support. I started Pax Web/Jetty part on
a local branch. I hope to have something this week around that. It takes a
little bit of time because the Jetty API slightly changed (as usual). This point
is a blocker and 4.2.0 needs it. If you think it's worth to have a 4.2.0.M3 with
this update, please let me know.
2. Merge karaf-docker feature branch. It's something that we discussed days ago.
I updated and cleanup the code for donation. Not blocker but good to have.
3. Merge examples branch. In order to allow users to easily start with Karaf,
François and I are working on a set of examples
(https://github.com/jbonofre/karaf/tree/DEV_GUIDE/examples). The idea is to
include those examples in the Karaf distribution, linked them in the developer
guide. At the end, I would like to add itests using these examples as well,
allowing us to detect regression. Again not a blocker, but good to have. Please,
let me know what you are thinking about the examples. Some examples are in
development (take a look in the examples pom.xml for the list of examples).
Roughly, I would like to cut 4.2.0 in 2 weeks or so.
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com