You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by Gyula Fóra <gy...@apache.org> on 2022/09/30 08:09:45 UTC
[VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.2.0, release candidate #2
Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 1.2.0 of
Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator,
as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
**Release Overview**
As an overview, the release consists of the following:
a) Kubernetes Operator canonical source distribution (including the
Dockerfile), to be deployed to the release repository at dist.apache.org
b) Kubernetes Operator Helm Chart to be deployed to the release repository
at dist.apache.org
c) Maven artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
d) Docker image to be pushed to dockerhub
**Staging Areas to Review**
The staging areas containing the above mentioned artifacts are as follows,
for your review:
* All artifacts for a,b) can be found in the corresponding dev repository
at dist.apache.org [1]
* All artifacts for c) can be found at the Apache Nexus Repository [2]
* The docker image for d) is staged on github [3]
All artifacts are signed with the key 21F06303B87DAFF1 [4]
Other links for your review:
* JIRA release notes [5]
* source code tag "release-1.2.0-rc2" [6]
* PR to update the website Downloads page to include Kubernetes Operator
links [7]
**Vote Duration**
The voting time will run for at least 72 hours.
It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
**Note on Verification**
You can follow the basic verification guide here[8].
Note that you don't need to verify everything yourself, but please make
note of what you have tested together with your +- vote.
Thanks,
Gyula Fora
[1]
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-1.2.0-rc2/
[2] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1538/
[3] ghcr.io/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator:95128bf
[4] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
[5]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12352091
[6]
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/tree/release-1.2.0-rc2
[7] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/573
[8]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Verifying+a+Flink+Kubernetes+Operator+Release
Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.2.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Gyula Fóra <gy...@apache.org>.
Thank you everyone for testing, I am closing this vote.
Will post the results as a separate email.
Gyula
On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 5:38 AM Chenya Zhang <ch...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 non-binding
>
> Tested a few example applications and checking the operator log.
>
> Chenya
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 3:18 PM Thomas Weise <th...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Built from tag, manually tested upgrade mode change scenarios, upgraded
> > existing environment
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 4:00 PM Márton Balassi <ba...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Verified upgrade process from 1.1 with a running application
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 5:52 PM Biao Geng <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1(non-binding)
> > > > Thanks a lot for the great work.
> > > >
> > > > Successfully verified the following:
> > > > - Checksums and gpg signatures of the tar files.
> > > > - No binaries in source release
> > > > - Build from source, build image from source without errors
> > > > - Helm Repo works, Helm install works
> > > > - Run HA/python example in application mode
> > > > - Check licenses in source code
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Biao Geng
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> 于2022年10月6日周四 20:16写道：
> > > >
> > > > > Turns out the issue with the Helm installation was that I was using
> > > > > cert-manager 1.9.1 instead of the recommended version 1.8.2. The
> > > operator
> > > > > now deploys cleanly in my local environment.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 12:34 PM Maximilian Michels <mxm@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (binding) because the source release looks good.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've verified the following:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. Downloaded, compiled, and verified the signature of the source
> > > > release
> > > > > > staged at
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-1.2.0-rc2/
> > > > > > 2. Verified licenses (Not a blocker: the LICENSE file does not
> > > contain
> > > > a
> > > > > > link to the bundled licenses directory, this should be fixed in
> > > future
> > > > > > releases)
> > > > > > 3. Verified the Helm Chart
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Helm chart installation resulted in the following pod events:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Events:
> > > > > > Type Reason Age From
> > > > Message
> > > > > > ---- ------ ---- ----
> > > > -------
> > > > > > Normal Scheduled 5m42s default-scheduler
> > > > > > Successfully assigned
> > > > default/flink-kubernetes-operator-54fcd9df98-645rf
> > > > > > to docker-desktop
> > > > > > Warning FailedMount 3m39s kubelet
> > > Unable
> > > > > to
> > > > > > attach or mount volumes: unmounted volumes=[keystore], unattached
> > > > > > volumes=[kube-api-access-pdnzw keystore
> > > flink-operator-config-volume]:
> > > > > > timed out waiting for the condition
> > > > > > Warning FailedMount 92s (x10 over 5m42s) kubelet
> > > > > > MountVolume.SetUp failed for volume "keystore" : secret
> > > > > > "webhook-server-cert" not found
> > > > > > Warning FailedMount 84s kubelet
> > > Unable
> > > > > to
> > > > > > attach or mount volumes: unmounted volumes=[keystore], unattached
> > > > > > volumes=[flink-operator-config-volume kube-api-access-pdnzw
> > > keystore]:
> > > > > > timed out waiting for the condition
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do we need to list any additional steps in the docs?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-docs-main/docs/try-flink-kubernetes-operator/quick-start/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Max
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 2:16 PM Őrhidi Mátyás <
> > > matyas.orhidi@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> - Verified source distributions (except the licenses and maven
> > > > > artifacts)
> > > > > >> - Verified Helm chart and Docker image
> > > > > >> - Verified basic examples
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Everything seems okay to me.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Cheers,
> > > > > >> Matyas
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 10:27 PM Gyula Fóra <
> gyula.fora@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > +1 (binding)
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > - Verified Helm repo works as expected, points to correct
> image
> > > tag,
> > > > > >> build,
> > > > > >> > version
> > > > > >> > - Verified examples + checked operator logs everything looks
> as
> > > > > expected
> > > > > >> > - Verified hashes, signatures and source release contains no
> > > > binaries
> > > > > >> > - Ran built-in tests, built jars + docker image from source
> > > > > successfully
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Cheers,
> > > > > >> > Gyula
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 2:27 AM Jim Busche <jbusche@us.ibm.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > +1 (not-binding)
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Thank you Gyula,
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Helm install from flink-kubernetes-operator-1.2.0-helm.tgz
> > looks
> > > > > good,
> > > > > >> > > logs look normal
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > podman Dockerfile build from source looks good.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > twistlock security scans of the proposed image look good:
> > > > > >> > > ghcr.io/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator:95128bf
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > UI and basic sample look good.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Checksums looked good.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Tested on OpenShift 4.10.25. Will try additional versions
> > (4.8
> > > > and
> > > > > >> 4.11)
> > > > > >> > > if I get an opportunity, but I don't expect issues.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Thank you,
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > James Busche
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.2.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Chenya Zhang <ch...@apache.org>.
+1 non-binding
Tested a few example applications and checking the operator log.
Chenya
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 3:18 PM Thomas Weise <th...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Built from tag, manually tested upgrade mode change scenarios, upgraded
> existing environment
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 4:00 PM Márton Balassi <ba...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Verified upgrade process from 1.1 with a running application
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 5:52 PM Biao Geng <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1(non-binding)
> > > Thanks a lot for the great work.
> > >
> > > Successfully verified the following:
> > > - Checksums and gpg signatures of the tar files.
> > > - No binaries in source release
> > > - Build from source, build image from source without errors
> > > - Helm Repo works, Helm install works
> > > - Run HA/python example in application mode
> > > - Check licenses in source code
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Biao Geng
> > >
> > >
> > > Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> 于2022年10月6日周四 20:16写道：
> > >
> > > > Turns out the issue with the Helm installation was that I was using
> > > > cert-manager 1.9.1 instead of the recommended version 1.8.2. The
> > operator
> > > > now deploys cleanly in my local environment.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 12:34 PM Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding) because the source release looks good.
> > > > >
> > > > > I've verified the following:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Downloaded, compiled, and verified the signature of the source
> > > release
> > > > > staged at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-1.2.0-rc2/
> > > > > 2. Verified licenses (Not a blocker: the LICENSE file does not
> > contain
> > > a
> > > > > link to the bundled licenses directory, this should be fixed in
> > future
> > > > > releases)
> > > > > 3. Verified the Helm Chart
> > > > >
> > > > > The Helm chart installation resulted in the following pod events:
> > > > >
> > > > > Events:
> > > > > Type Reason Age From
> > > Message
> > > > > ---- ------ ---- ----
> > > -------
> > > > > Normal Scheduled 5m42s default-scheduler
> > > > > Successfully assigned
> > > default/flink-kubernetes-operator-54fcd9df98-645rf
> > > > > to docker-desktop
> > > > > Warning FailedMount 3m39s kubelet
> > Unable
> > > > to
> > > > > attach or mount volumes: unmounted volumes=[keystore], unattached
> > > > > volumes=[kube-api-access-pdnzw keystore
> > flink-operator-config-volume]:
> > > > > timed out waiting for the condition
> > > > > Warning FailedMount 92s (x10 over 5m42s) kubelet
> > > > > MountVolume.SetUp failed for volume "keystore" : secret
> > > > > "webhook-server-cert" not found
> > > > > Warning FailedMount 84s kubelet
> > Unable
> > > > to
> > > > > attach or mount volumes: unmounted volumes=[keystore], unattached
> > > > > volumes=[flink-operator-config-volume kube-api-access-pdnzw
> > keystore]:
> > > > > timed out waiting for the condition
> > > > >
> > > > > Do we need to list any additional steps in the docs?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-docs-main/docs/try-flink-kubernetes-operator/quick-start/
> > > > >
> > > > > -Max
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 2:16 PM Őrhidi Mátyás <
> > matyas.orhidi@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> - Verified source distributions (except the licenses and maven
> > > > artifacts)
> > > > >> - Verified Helm chart and Docker image
> > > > >> - Verified basic examples
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Everything seems okay to me.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Cheers,
> > > > >> Matyas
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 10:27 PM Gyula Fóra <gy...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > +1 (binding)
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > - Verified Helm repo works as expected, points to correct image
> > tag,
> > > > >> build,
> > > > >> > version
> > > > >> > - Verified examples + checked operator logs everything looks as
> > > > expected
> > > > >> > - Verified hashes, signatures and source release contains no
> > > binaries
> > > > >> > - Ran built-in tests, built jars + docker image from source
> > > > successfully
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Cheers,
> > > > >> > Gyula
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 2:27 AM Jim Busche <jb...@us.ibm.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > +1 (not-binding)
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Thank you Gyula,
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Helm install from flink-kubernetes-operator-1.2.0-helm.tgz
> looks
> > > > good,
> > > > >> > > logs look normal
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > podman Dockerfile build from source looks good.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > twistlock security scans of the proposed image look good:
> > > > >> > > ghcr.io/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator:95128bf
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > UI and basic sample look good.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Checksums looked good.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Tested on OpenShift 4.10.25. Will try additional versions
> (4.8
> > > and
> > > > >> 4.11)
> > > > >> > > if I get an opportunity, but I don't expect issues.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Thank you,
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > James Busche
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.2.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Thomas Weise <th...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
Built from tag, manually tested upgrade mode change scenarios, upgraded
existing environment
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 4:00 PM Márton Balassi <ba...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified upgrade process from 1.1 with a running application
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 5:52 PM Biao Geng <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1(non-binding)
> > Thanks a lot for the great work.
> >
> > Successfully verified the following:
> > - Checksums and gpg signatures of the tar files.
> > - No binaries in source release
> > - Build from source, build image from source without errors
> > - Helm Repo works, Helm install works
> > - Run HA/python example in application mode
> > - Check licenses in source code
> >
> > Best,
> > Biao Geng
> >
> >
> > Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> 于2022年10月6日周四 20:16写道：
> >
> > > Turns out the issue with the Helm installation was that I was using
> > > cert-manager 1.9.1 instead of the recommended version 1.8.2. The
> operator
> > > now deploys cleanly in my local environment.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 12:34 PM Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (binding) because the source release looks good.
> > > >
> > > > I've verified the following:
> > > >
> > > > 1. Downloaded, compiled, and verified the signature of the source
> > release
> > > > staged at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-1.2.0-rc2/
> > > > 2. Verified licenses (Not a blocker: the LICENSE file does not
> contain
> > a
> > > > link to the bundled licenses directory, this should be fixed in
> future
> > > > releases)
> > > > 3. Verified the Helm Chart
> > > >
> > > > The Helm chart installation resulted in the following pod events:
> > > >
> > > > Events:
> > > > Type Reason Age From
> > Message
> > > > ---- ------ ---- ----
> > -------
> > > > Normal Scheduled 5m42s default-scheduler
> > > > Successfully assigned
> > default/flink-kubernetes-operator-54fcd9df98-645rf
> > > > to docker-desktop
> > > > Warning FailedMount 3m39s kubelet
> Unable
> > > to
> > > > attach or mount volumes: unmounted volumes=[keystore], unattached
> > > > volumes=[kube-api-access-pdnzw keystore
> flink-operator-config-volume]:
> > > > timed out waiting for the condition
> > > > Warning FailedMount 92s (x10 over 5m42s) kubelet
> > > > MountVolume.SetUp failed for volume "keystore" : secret
> > > > "webhook-server-cert" not found
> > > > Warning FailedMount 84s kubelet
> Unable
> > > to
> > > > attach or mount volumes: unmounted volumes=[keystore], unattached
> > > > volumes=[flink-operator-config-volume kube-api-access-pdnzw
> keystore]:
> > > > timed out waiting for the condition
> > > >
> > > > Do we need to list any additional steps in the docs?
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-docs-main/docs/try-flink-kubernetes-operator/quick-start/
> > > >
> > > > -Max
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 2:16 PM Őrhidi Mátyás <
> matyas.orhidi@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>
> > > >> - Verified source distributions (except the licenses and maven
> > > artifacts)
> > > >> - Verified Helm chart and Docker image
> > > >> - Verified basic examples
> > > >>
> > > >> Everything seems okay to me.
> > > >>
> > > >> Cheers,
> > > >> Matyas
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 10:27 PM Gyula Fóra <gy...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > +1 (binding)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > - Verified Helm repo works as expected, points to correct image
> tag,
> > > >> build,
> > > >> > version
> > > >> > - Verified examples + checked operator logs everything looks as
> > > expected
> > > >> > - Verified hashes, signatures and source release contains no
> > binaries
> > > >> > - Ran built-in tests, built jars + docker image from source
> > > successfully
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Cheers,
> > > >> > Gyula
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 2:27 AM Jim Busche <jb...@us.ibm.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > +1 (not-binding)
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Thank you Gyula,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Helm install from flink-kubernetes-operator-1.2.0-helm.tgz looks
> > > good,
> > > >> > > logs look normal
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > podman Dockerfile build from source looks good.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > twistlock security scans of the proposed image look good:
> > > >> > > ghcr.io/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator:95128bf
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > UI and basic sample look good.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Checksums looked good.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Tested on OpenShift 4.10.25. Will try additional versions (4.8
> > and
> > > >> 4.11)
> > > >> > > if I get an opportunity, but I don't expect issues.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Thank you,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > James Busche
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.2.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Márton Balassi <ba...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
Verified upgrade process from 1.1 with a running application
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 5:52 PM Biao Geng <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1(non-binding)
> Thanks a lot for the great work.
>
> Successfully verified the following:
> - Checksums and gpg signatures of the tar files.
> - No binaries in source release
> - Build from source, build image from source without errors
> - Helm Repo works, Helm install works
> - Run HA/python example in application mode
> - Check licenses in source code
>
> Best,
> Biao Geng
>
>
> Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> 于2022年10月6日周四 20:16写道：
>
> > Turns out the issue with the Helm installation was that I was using
> > cert-manager 1.9.1 instead of the recommended version 1.8.2. The operator
> > now deploys cleanly in my local environment.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 12:34 PM Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding) because the source release looks good.
> > >
> > > I've verified the following:
> > >
> > > 1. Downloaded, compiled, and verified the signature of the source
> release
> > > staged at
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-1.2.0-rc2/
> > > 2. Verified licenses (Not a blocker: the LICENSE file does not contain
> a
> > > link to the bundled licenses directory, this should be fixed in future
> > > releases)
> > > 3. Verified the Helm Chart
> > >
> > > The Helm chart installation resulted in the following pod events:
> > >
> > > Events:
> > > Type Reason Age From
> Message
> > > ---- ------ ---- ----
> -------
> > > Normal Scheduled 5m42s default-scheduler
> > > Successfully assigned
> default/flink-kubernetes-operator-54fcd9df98-645rf
> > > to docker-desktop
> > > Warning FailedMount 3m39s kubelet Unable
> > to
> > > attach or mount volumes: unmounted volumes=[keystore], unattached
> > > volumes=[kube-api-access-pdnzw keystore flink-operator-config-volume]:
> > > timed out waiting for the condition
> > > Warning FailedMount 92s (x10 over 5m42s) kubelet
> > > MountVolume.SetUp failed for volume "keystore" : secret
> > > "webhook-server-cert" not found
> > > Warning FailedMount 84s kubelet Unable
> > to
> > > attach or mount volumes: unmounted volumes=[keystore], unattached
> > > volumes=[flink-operator-config-volume kube-api-access-pdnzw keystore]:
> > > timed out waiting for the condition
> > >
> > > Do we need to list any additional steps in the docs?
> > >
> >
> https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-docs-main/docs/try-flink-kubernetes-operator/quick-start/
> > >
> > > -Max
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 2:16 PM Őrhidi Mátyás <ma...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>
> > >> - Verified source distributions (except the licenses and maven
> > artifacts)
> > >> - Verified Helm chart and Docker image
> > >> - Verified basic examples
> > >>
> > >> Everything seems okay to me.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Matyas
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 10:27 PM Gyula Fóra <gy...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > +1 (binding)
> > >> >
> > >> > - Verified Helm repo works as expected, points to correct image tag,
> > >> build,
> > >> > version
> > >> > - Verified examples + checked operator logs everything looks as
> > expected
> > >> > - Verified hashes, signatures and source release contains no
> binaries
> > >> > - Ran built-in tests, built jars + docker image from source
> > successfully
> > >> >
> > >> > Cheers,
> > >> > Gyula
> > >> >
> > >> > On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 2:27 AM Jim Busche <jb...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > +1 (not-binding)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thank you Gyula,
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Helm install from flink-kubernetes-operator-1.2.0-helm.tgz looks
> > good,
> > >> > > logs look normal
> > >> > >
> > >> > > podman Dockerfile build from source looks good.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > twistlock security scans of the proposed image look good:
> > >> > > ghcr.io/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator:95128bf
> > >> > >
> > >> > > UI and basic sample look good.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Checksums looked good.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Tested on OpenShift 4.10.25. Will try additional versions (4.8
> and
> > >> 4.11)
> > >> > > if I get an opportunity, but I don't expect issues.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thank you,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > James Busche
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.2.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Biao Geng <bi...@gmail.com>.
+1(non-binding)
Thanks a lot for the great work.
Successfully verified the following:
- Checksums and gpg signatures of the tar files.
- No binaries in source release
- Build from source, build image from source without errors
- Helm Repo works, Helm install works
- Run HA/python example in application mode
- Check licenses in source code
Best,
Biao Geng
Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> 于2022年10月6日周四 20:16写道：
> Turns out the issue with the Helm installation was that I was using
> cert-manager 1.9.1 instead of the recommended version 1.8.2. The operator
> now deploys cleanly in my local environment.
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 12:34 PM Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding) because the source release looks good.
> >
> > I've verified the following:
> >
> > 1. Downloaded, compiled, and verified the signature of the source release
> > staged at
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-1.2.0-rc2/
> > 2. Verified licenses (Not a blocker: the LICENSE file does not contain a
> > link to the bundled licenses directory, this should be fixed in future
> > releases)
> > 3. Verified the Helm Chart
> >
> > The Helm chart installation resulted in the following pod events:
> >
> > Events:
> > Type Reason Age From Message
> > ---- ------ ---- ---- -------
> > Normal Scheduled 5m42s default-scheduler
> > Successfully assigned default/flink-kubernetes-operator-54fcd9df98-645rf
> > to docker-desktop
> > Warning FailedMount 3m39s kubelet Unable
> to
> > attach or mount volumes: unmounted volumes=[keystore], unattached
> > volumes=[kube-api-access-pdnzw keystore flink-operator-config-volume]:
> > timed out waiting for the condition
> > Warning FailedMount 92s (x10 over 5m42s) kubelet
> > MountVolume.SetUp failed for volume "keystore" : secret
> > "webhook-server-cert" not found
> > Warning FailedMount 84s kubelet Unable
> to
> > attach or mount volumes: unmounted volumes=[keystore], unattached
> > volumes=[flink-operator-config-volume kube-api-access-pdnzw keystore]:
> > timed out waiting for the condition
> >
> > Do we need to list any additional steps in the docs?
> >
> https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-docs-main/docs/try-flink-kubernetes-operator/quick-start/
> >
> > -Max
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 2:16 PM Őrhidi Mátyás <ma...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (non-binding)
> >>
> >> - Verified source distributions (except the licenses and maven
> artifacts)
> >> - Verified Helm chart and Docker image
> >> - Verified basic examples
> >>
> >> Everything seems okay to me.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Matyas
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 10:27 PM Gyula Fóra <gy...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > +1 (binding)
> >> >
> >> > - Verified Helm repo works as expected, points to correct image tag,
> >> build,
> >> > version
> >> > - Verified examples + checked operator logs everything looks as
> expected
> >> > - Verified hashes, signatures and source release contains no binaries
> >> > - Ran built-in tests, built jars + docker image from source
> successfully
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Gyula
> >> >
> >> > On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 2:27 AM Jim Busche <jb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > +1 (not-binding)
> >> > >
> >> > > Thank you Gyula,
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Helm install from flink-kubernetes-operator-1.2.0-helm.tgz looks
> good,
> >> > > logs look normal
> >> > >
> >> > > podman Dockerfile build from source looks good.
> >> > >
> >> > > twistlock security scans of the proposed image look good:
> >> > > ghcr.io/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator:95128bf
> >> > >
> >> > > UI and basic sample look good.
> >> > >
> >> > > Checksums looked good.
> >> > >
> >> > > Tested on OpenShift 4.10.25. Will try additional versions (4.8 and
> >> 4.11)
> >> > > if I get an opportunity, but I don't expect issues.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Thank you,
> >> > >
> >> > > James Busche
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.2.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>.
Turns out the issue with the Helm installation was that I was using
cert-manager 1.9.1 instead of the recommended version 1.8.2. The operator
now deploys cleanly in my local environment.
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 12:34 PM Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (binding) because the source release looks good.
>
> I've verified the following:
>
> 1. Downloaded, compiled, and verified the signature of the source release
> staged at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-1.2.0-rc2/
> 2. Verified licenses (Not a blocker: the LICENSE file does not contain a
> link to the bundled licenses directory, this should be fixed in future
> releases)
> 3. Verified the Helm Chart
>
> The Helm chart installation resulted in the following pod events:
>
> Events:
> Type Reason Age From Message
> ---- ------ ---- ---- -------
> Normal Scheduled 5m42s default-scheduler
> Successfully assigned default/flink-kubernetes-operator-54fcd9df98-645rf
> to docker-desktop
> Warning FailedMount 3m39s kubelet Unable to
> attach or mount volumes: unmounted volumes=[keystore], unattached
> volumes=[kube-api-access-pdnzw keystore flink-operator-config-volume]:
> timed out waiting for the condition
> Warning FailedMount 92s (x10 over 5m42s) kubelet
> MountVolume.SetUp failed for volume "keystore" : secret
> "webhook-server-cert" not found
> Warning FailedMount 84s kubelet Unable to
> attach or mount volumes: unmounted volumes=[keystore], unattached
> volumes=[flink-operator-config-volume kube-api-access-pdnzw keystore]:
> timed out waiting for the condition
>
> Do we need to list any additional steps in the docs?
> https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-docs-main/docs/try-flink-kubernetes-operator/quick-start/
>
> -Max
>
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 2:16 PM Őrhidi Mátyás <ma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> - Verified source distributions (except the licenses and maven artifacts)
>> - Verified Helm chart and Docker image
>> - Verified basic examples
>>
>> Everything seems okay to me.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Matyas
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 10:27 PM Gyula Fóra <gy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 (binding)
>> >
>> > - Verified Helm repo works as expected, points to correct image tag,
>> build,
>> > version
>> > - Verified examples + checked operator logs everything looks as expected
>> > - Verified hashes, signatures and source release contains no binaries
>> > - Ran built-in tests, built jars + docker image from source successfully
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Gyula
>> >
>> > On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 2:27 AM Jim Busche <jb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1 (not-binding)
>> > >
>> > > Thank you Gyula,
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Helm install from flink-kubernetes-operator-1.2.0-helm.tgz looks good,
>> > > logs look normal
>> > >
>> > > podman Dockerfile build from source looks good.
>> > >
>> > > twistlock security scans of the proposed image look good:
>> > > ghcr.io/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator:95128bf
>> > >
>> > > UI and basic sample look good.
>> > >
>> > > Checksums looked good.
>> > >
>> > > Tested on OpenShift 4.10.25. Will try additional versions (4.8 and
>> 4.11)
>> > > if I get an opportunity, but I don't expect issues.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Thank you,
>> > >
>> > > James Busche
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.2.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding) because the source release looks good.
I've verified the following:
1. Downloaded, compiled, and verified the signature of the source release
staged at
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-1.2.0-rc2/
2. Verified licenses (Not a blocker: the LICENSE file does not contain a
link to the bundled licenses directory, this should be fixed in future
releases)
3. Verified the Helm Chart
The Helm chart installation resulted in the following pod events:
Events:
Type Reason Age From Message
---- ------ ---- ---- -------
Normal Scheduled 5m42s default-scheduler
Successfully assigned default/flink-kubernetes-operator-54fcd9df98-645rf
to docker-desktop
Warning FailedMount 3m39s kubelet Unable to
attach or mount volumes: unmounted volumes=[keystore], unattached
volumes=[kube-api-access-pdnzw keystore flink-operator-config-volume]:
timed out waiting for the condition
Warning FailedMount 92s (x10 over 5m42s) kubelet
MountVolume.SetUp failed for volume "keystore" : secret
"webhook-server-cert" not found
Warning FailedMount 84s kubelet Unable to
attach or mount volumes: unmounted volumes=[keystore], unattached
volumes=[flink-operator-config-volume kube-api-access-pdnzw keystore]:
timed out waiting for the condition
Do we need to list any additional steps in the docs?
https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-docs-main/docs/try-flink-kubernetes-operator/quick-start/
-Max
On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 2:16 PM Őrhidi Mátyás <ma...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - Verified source distributions (except the licenses and maven artifacts)
> - Verified Helm chart and Docker image
> - Verified basic examples
>
> Everything seems okay to me.
>
> Cheers,
> Matyas
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 10:27 PM Gyula Fóra <gy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > - Verified Helm repo works as expected, points to correct image tag,
> build,
> > version
> > - Verified examples + checked operator logs everything looks as expected
> > - Verified hashes, signatures and source release contains no binaries
> > - Ran built-in tests, built jars + docker image from source successfully
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Gyula
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 2:27 AM Jim Busche <jb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (not-binding)
> > >
> > > Thank you Gyula,
> > >
> > >
> > > Helm install from flink-kubernetes-operator-1.2.0-helm.tgz looks good,
> > > logs look normal
> > >
> > > podman Dockerfile build from source looks good.
> > >
> > > twistlock security scans of the proposed image look good:
> > > ghcr.io/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator:95128bf
> > >
> > > UI and basic sample look good.
> > >
> > > Checksums looked good.
> > >
> > > Tested on OpenShift 4.10.25. Will try additional versions (4.8 and
> 4.11)
> > > if I get an opportunity, but I don't expect issues.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > >
> > > James Busche
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.2.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Őrhidi Mátyás <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified source distributions (except the licenses and maven artifacts)
- Verified Helm chart and Docker image
- Verified basic examples
Everything seems okay to me.
Cheers,
Matyas
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 10:27 PM Gyula Fóra <gy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified Helm repo works as expected, points to correct image tag, build,
> version
> - Verified examples + checked operator logs everything looks as expected
> - Verified hashes, signatures and source release contains no binaries
> - Ran built-in tests, built jars + docker image from source successfully
>
> Cheers,
> Gyula
>
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 2:27 AM Jim Busche <jb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (not-binding)
> >
> > Thank you Gyula,
> >
> >
> > Helm install from flink-kubernetes-operator-1.2.0-helm.tgz looks good,
> > logs look normal
> >
> > podman Dockerfile build from source looks good.
> >
> > twistlock security scans of the proposed image look good:
> > ghcr.io/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator:95128bf
> >
> > UI and basic sample look good.
> >
> > Checksums looked good.
> >
> > Tested on OpenShift 4.10.25. Will try additional versions (4.8 and 4.11)
> > if I get an opportunity, but I don't expect issues.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > James Busche
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.2.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Gyula Fóra <gy...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
- Verified Helm repo works as expected, points to correct image tag, build,
version
- Verified examples + checked operator logs everything looks as expected
- Verified hashes, signatures and source release contains no binaries
- Ran built-in tests, built jars + docker image from source successfully
Cheers,
Gyula
On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 2:27 AM Jim Busche <jb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> +1 (not-binding)
>
> Thank you Gyula,
>
>
> Helm install from flink-kubernetes-operator-1.2.0-helm.tgz looks good,
> logs look normal
>
> podman Dockerfile build from source looks good.
>
> twistlock security scans of the proposed image look good:
> ghcr.io/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator:95128bf
>
> UI and basic sample look good.
>
> Checksums looked good.
>
> Tested on OpenShift 4.10.25. Will try additional versions (4.8 and 4.11)
> if I get an opportunity, but I don't expect issues.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> James Busche
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.2.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Jim Busche <jb...@us.ibm.com>.
+1 (not-binding)
Thank you Gyula,
Helm install from flink-kubernetes-operator-1.2.0-helm.tgz looks good, logs look normal
podman Dockerfile build from source looks good.
twistlock security scans of the proposed image look good: ghcr.io/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator:95128bf
UI and basic sample look good.
Checksums looked good.
Tested on OpenShift 4.10.25. Will try additional versions (4.8 and 4.11) if I get an opportunity, but I don't expect issues.
Thank you,
James Busche