You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org> on 2023/10/16 15:08:11 UTC
[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Hi all,
after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again:
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58:
[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
[ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
sha512: 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate.
Cheers,
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Posted by Steffen <in...@apachelounge.com>.
I think William Rowe can help. He is the guy who helped a lot with windows.
> Op 17 okt 2023 om 12:05 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org> het volgende geschreven:
>
> I am trying to contact another person that builds regularly mod_h2 on Windows.
>
>> Am 17.10.2023 um 11:30 schrieb Steffen <in...@apachelounge.com>:
>>
>> Same error on win64.
>> Yes the reported mod_http2 errors on 32 and 64.
>> Yes, I am not able to tell what is wrong, only I can report the errors. I am not a developer, just building and testing.
>>
>> Regards, Steffen
>>
>>>> Op 17 okt 2023 om 11:08 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org> het volgende geschreven:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Am 17.10.2023 um 08:41 schrieb Steffen <in...@apachelounge.com>:
>>>>
>>>> -1 does not build on windows.
>>>
>>> If I understood your reports from yesterday correctly, the situation is
>>> - you can build on win64
>>> - you get compiler errors on your win32 build
>>> - you are not able to tell us what is wrong
>>>
>>> Correct?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Stefan
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Steffen
>>>>
>>>>>> Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org> het volgende geschreven:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again:
>>>>>
>>>>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
>>>>> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58:
>>>>> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
>>>>> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
>>>>> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
>>>>> sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
>>>>> sha512: 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
>>>>>
>>>>> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Stefan
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@sunstarsys.com>.
Steve Hay was a great resource once upon a time ago, but meh, you can't
draw blood from a stone forever.
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 12:32 PM Steffen <in...@apachelounge.com> wrote:
> For me still -1.
>
> > Op 17 okt 2023 om 18:18 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev <
> dev@httpd.apache.org> het volgende geschreven:
> >
> > Just got a reply from a contact that build rc3 on win64 and ran it
> successfully. I invited him to participate here, not sure if he will feel
> like it.
> >
> > I count that as a +1 on win64 unless someone objects.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Stefan
> >
> >
> >> Am 17.10.2023 um 12:05 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev <
> dev@httpd.apache.org>:
> >>
> >> I am trying to contact another person that builds regularly mod_h2 on
> Windows.
> >>
> >>>> Am 17.10.2023 um 11:30 schrieb Steffen <in...@apachelounge.com>:
> >>>
> >>> Same error on win64.
> >>> Yes the reported mod_http2 errors on 32 and 64.
> >>> Yes, I am not able to tell what is wrong, only I can report the
> errors. I am not a developer, just building and testing.
> >>>
> >>> Regards, Steffen
> >>>
> >>>> Op 17 okt 2023 om 11:08 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev <
> dev@httpd.apache.org> het volgende geschreven:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Am 17.10.2023 um 08:41 schrieb Steffen <in...@apachelounge.com>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -1 does not build on windows.
> >>>>
> >>>> If I understood your reports from yesterday correctly, the situation
> is
> >>>> - you can build on win64
> >>>> - you get compiler errors on your win32 build
> >>>> - you are not able to tell us what is wrong
> >>>>
> >>>> Correct?
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Stefan
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Steffen
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev <
> dev@httpd.apache.org> het volgende geschreven:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> >>>>>> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58:
> >>>>>> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> >>>>>> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> >>>>>> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
> >>>>>> sha256:
> 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6
> *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
> >>>>>> sha512:
> 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3
> *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>> Stefan
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Posted by Steffen <in...@apachelounge.com>.
For me still -1.
> Op 17 okt 2023 om 18:18 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Just got a reply from a contact that build rc3 on win64 and ran it successfully. I invited him to participate here, not sure if he will feel like it.
>
> I count that as a +1 on win64 unless someone objects.
>
> Cheers,
> Stefan
>
>
>> Am 17.10.2023 um 12:05 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org>:
>>
>> I am trying to contact another person that builds regularly mod_h2 on Windows.
>>
>>>> Am 17.10.2023 um 11:30 schrieb Steffen <in...@apachelounge.com>:
>>>
>>> Same error on win64.
>>> Yes the reported mod_http2 errors on 32 and 64.
>>> Yes, I am not able to tell what is wrong, only I can report the errors. I am not a developer, just building and testing.
>>>
>>> Regards, Steffen
>>>
>>>> Op 17 okt 2023 om 11:08 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org> het volgende geschreven:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Am 17.10.2023 um 08:41 schrieb Steffen <in...@apachelounge.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> -1 does not build on windows.
>>>>
>>>> If I understood your reports from yesterday correctly, the situation is
>>>> - you can build on win64
>>>> - you get compiler errors on your win32 build
>>>> - you are not able to tell us what is wrong
>>>>
>>>> Correct?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Stefan
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Steffen
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org> het volgende geschreven:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
>>>>>> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58:
>>>>>> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
>>>>>> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
>>>>>> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
>>>>>> sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
>>>>>> sha512: 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Stefan
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Posted by Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org>.
Just got a reply from a contact that build rc3 on win64 and ran it successfully. I invited him to participate here, not sure if he will feel like it.
I count that as a +1 on win64 unless someone objects.
Cheers,
Stefan
> Am 17.10.2023 um 12:05 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org>:
>
> I am trying to contact another person that builds regularly mod_h2 on Windows.
>
>> Am 17.10.2023 um 11:30 schrieb Steffen <in...@apachelounge.com>:
>>
>> Same error on win64.
>> Yes the reported mod_http2 errors on 32 and 64.
>> Yes, I am not able to tell what is wrong, only I can report the errors. I am not a developer, just building and testing.
>>
>> Regards, Steffen
>>
>>> Op 17 okt 2023 om 11:08 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org> het volgende geschreven:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Am 17.10.2023 um 08:41 schrieb Steffen <in...@apachelounge.com>:
>>>>
>>>> -1 does not build on windows.
>>>
>>> If I understood your reports from yesterday correctly, the situation is
>>> - you can build on win64
>>> - you get compiler errors on your win32 build
>>> - you are not able to tell us what is wrong
>>>
>>> Correct?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Stefan
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Steffen
>>>>
>>>>>> Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org> het volgende geschreven:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again:
>>>>>
>>>>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
>>>>> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58:
>>>>> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
>>>>> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
>>>>> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
>>>>> sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
>>>>> sha512: 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
>>>>>
>>>>> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Stefan
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Posted by Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org>.
I am trying to contact another person that builds regularly mod_h2 on Windows.
> Am 17.10.2023 um 11:30 schrieb Steffen <in...@apachelounge.com>:
>
> Same error on win64.
> Yes the reported mod_http2 errors on 32 and 64.
> Yes, I am not able to tell what is wrong, only I can report the errors. I am not a developer, just building and testing.
>
> Regards, Steffen
>
>> Op 17 okt 2023 om 11:08 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Am 17.10.2023 um 08:41 schrieb Steffen <in...@apachelounge.com>:
>>>
>>> -1 does not build on windows.
>>
>> If I understood your reports from yesterday correctly, the situation is
>> - you can build on win64
>> - you get compiler errors on your win32 build
>> - you are not able to tell us what is wrong
>>
>> Correct?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Stefan
>>
>>>
>>> Steffen
>>>
>>>>> Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org> het volgende geschreven:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again:
>>>>
>>>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>>>>
>>>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
>>>> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58:
>>>> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
>>>> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
>>>> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>>>>
>>>> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
>>>> sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
>>>> sha512: 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
>>>>
>>>> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Stefan
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Posted by Steffen <in...@apachelounge.com>.
Same error on win64.
Yes the reported mod_http2 errors on 32 and 64.
Yes, I am not able to tell what is wrong, only I can report the errors. I am not a developer, just building and testing.
Regards, Steffen
> Op 17 okt 2023 om 11:08 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org> het volgende geschreven:
>
>
>
>> Am 17.10.2023 um 08:41 schrieb Steffen <in...@apachelounge.com>:
>>
>> -1 does not build on windows.
>
> If I understood your reports from yesterday correctly, the situation is
> - you can build on win64
> - you get compiler errors on your win32 build
> - you are not able to tell us what is wrong
>
> Correct?
>
> Cheers,
> Stefan
>
>>
>> Steffen
>>
>>>> Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org> het volgende geschreven:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again:
>>>
>>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>>>
>>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
>>> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58:
>>> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
>>> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
>>> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>>>
>>> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
>>> sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
>>> sha512: 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
>>>
>>> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Stefan
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Posted by Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org>.
> Am 17.10.2023 um 08:41 schrieb Steffen <in...@apachelounge.com>:
>
> -1 does not build on windows.
If I understood your reports from yesterday correctly, the situation is
- you can build on win64
- you get compiler errors on your win32 build
- you are not able to tell us what is wrong
Correct?
Cheers,
Stefan
>
> Steffen
>
>> Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again:
>>
>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>>
>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
>> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58:
>> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
>> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
>> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>>
>> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
>> sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
>> sha512: 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
>>
>> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Stefan
>
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Posted by Steffen <in...@apachelounge.com>.
-1 does not build on windows.
Steffen
> Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi all,
>
> after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again:
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58:
> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>
> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
> sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
> sha512: 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
>
> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate.
>
> Cheers,
> Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Posted by Frank Gingras <th...@apache.org>.
+1 for me, Slackware64 15.0. Thanks for the RM, yes.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 11:43 AM Joe Orton <jo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 05:08:11PM +0200, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again:
> >
> > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
> >
> > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58:
> > [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>
> +1 for release from me, sigs good; builds and passes tests on Fedora 39
> and RHEL 8 and 9, my old computers are happy again ;)
>
> Big thanks for fixes and RMing.
>
> Regards, Joe
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Posted by Joe Orton <jo...@redhat.com>.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 05:08:11PM +0200, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again:
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58:
> [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
+1 for release from me, sigs good; builds and passes tests on Fedora 39
and RHEL 8 and 9, my old computers are happy again ;)
Big thanks for fixes and RMing.
Regards, Joe
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Posted by Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org>.
> Am 16.10.2023 um 17:08 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org>:
>
> Hi all,
>
> after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again:
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58:
> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>
> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
> sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
> sha512: 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
>
> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate.
>
> Cheers,
> Stefan
+1 on macOS Ventura 13.5.2
- Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Posted by Cory McIntire <co...@webpros.com>.
+1
Built/tested on:
CentOS 6
CentOS 7
AlmaLinux 9
Ubuntu 20.04
Ubuntu 22.04
Regards,
Cory McIntire | Lead – cPanel Application Security Team | Release Manager – EasyApache
cory.mcintire@webpros.com<ma...@webpros.com> | cPanel – a webpros company
From: Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org>
Date: Monday, October 16, 2023 at 10:08
To: dev@httpd.apache.org <de...@httpd.apache.org>
Cc: Stefan Eissing <st...@eissing.org>
Subject: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Hi all,
after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again:
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fhttpd%2F&data=05%7C01%7Ccory%40cpanel.net%7Ce5c41228d1ce4a24971208dbce59cb59%7Cf8497356a834406086b6d4b1d8059ee0%7C0%7C0%7C638330657304238920%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Hvd0FLQKHpx%2F4%2Flfj2iYh2mCcE4jNevfMZDL0piuolQ%3D&reserved=0<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/>
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58:
[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
[ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
sha512: 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate.
Cheers,
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Posted by Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org>.
> Am 19.10.2023 um 13:27 schrieb Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>:
>
> Am 16.10.23 um 17:08 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev:
>> Hi all,
>> after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again:
>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
>> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58:
>> [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
>> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
>> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
>> sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
>> sha512: 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
>> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate.
>> Cheers,
>> Stefan
>
> I know I am late, but for the sake of completeness my test results:
I am happy nevertheless (and relieved that it went well)! Thanks for these awesome test coverage, Rainer.
Cheers,
Stefan
> +1 to release and thanks a bunch for RM!
>
> The full range of unit tests is still running, but enough have completed for a vote.
>
> - Sigs and hashes OK
> - contents of tarballs identical
> - contents of tag and tarballs identical
> except for expected deltas
>
> Built on
>
> - SLES 11+12+15 (64 Bits)
> - RHEL 6+7+8+9 (64 Bits)
>
> For all platforms built
>
> - with default (shared) and static modules
> - with module set reallyall
> - using --enable-load-all-modules
>
> - using libraries
> - APR/APU
> - bundled deps tarball
> - 1.7.4/1.6.3
> - 1.6.5/1.6.3
> - 1.7.x(r1911757)/1.7.x(r1911757) with libxml2
> - 1.7.x(r1911757)/1.7.x(r1911757) with expat
> - 1.6.x(r1908753)/1.6.x(r1911757)
> - trunk(r1911757) with libxml2
> - trunk(r1911757) with expat
> - OpenSSL 3.1.3, 3.0.11, 1.1.1w,
> and for all except RHEL 9
> also 1.1.1, 1.0.2u, 1.0.2
> - expat 2.5.0
> - pcre 10.42
> - lua 5.4.6 (compiled with LUA_COMPAT_MODULE)
> - libxml2 2.11.5
> - libnghttp2 1.57.0
> - brotli 1.1.0
> - curl 8.4.0
> - jansson 2.14
> - libldap 2.6.6 (2.5.7 with OpenSSL 1.1.1,
> 2.4.59 with OpenSSL 1.0.2*)
>
> - in total 200 builds per platform (80 for RHEL 9)
>
> - Tool chain:
> - platform gcc
> - CFLAGS: -O2 -g -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing
>
> All builds succeeded.
>
> - compiler warnings:
>
> - deprecation warnings when building against OpenSSL 3.1.3, see other thread
>
> Tested for
>
> - SLES 11+12+15
> - RHEL 6+7+8+9
> - MPMs prefork, worker, event
> - log level trace8
> - Perl client bundle build against OpenSSL 3.1.0beta1-1,
> 3.0.0, 1.1.1g plus patches, 1.1.0l, 1.0.2u and 1.1.0l-1
> (RHEL 9 3.1.2-1, 3.0.10-1, 1.1.1w-1)
>
> Every OpenSSL version in the client tested with every OpenSSL version in the server. 18 unit test runs (3 MPMS x 6 OpenSSL clients) per server build.
>
> About 2.400 unit test runs are done, most with server OpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0, for RHEL 9 also 1.1.1.
>
> Some local adjustments to tests were used:
>
> - t/modules/buffer.t: removing huge buffer tests
> - my $bigsize = 100000;
> + my $bigsize = 50000;
>
> The following test failures were seen:
>
> a t/modules/buffer.t line 37
> Not a regression
> Only on RHEL 6, SLES 11.
>
> c t/modules/sed.t line 37 test 3
> Not a regression
> Only on RHEL 6, SLES 11.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Rainer
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
Am 16.10.23 um 17:08 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev:
> Hi all,
>
> after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again:
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58:
> [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>
> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
> sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
> sha512: 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
>
> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate.
>
> Cheers,
> Stefan
I know I am late, but for the sake of completeness my test results:
+1 to release and thanks a bunch for RM!
The full range of unit tests is still running, but enough have completed
for a vote.
- Sigs and hashes OK
- contents of tarballs identical
- contents of tag and tarballs identical
except for expected deltas
Built on
- SLES 11+12+15 (64 Bits)
- RHEL 6+7+8+9 (64 Bits)
For all platforms built
- with default (shared) and static modules
- with module set reallyall
- using --enable-load-all-modules
- using libraries
- APR/APU
- bundled deps tarball
- 1.7.4/1.6.3
- 1.6.5/1.6.3
- 1.7.x(r1911757)/1.7.x(r1911757) with libxml2
- 1.7.x(r1911757)/1.7.x(r1911757) with expat
- 1.6.x(r1908753)/1.6.x(r1911757)
- trunk(r1911757) with libxml2
- trunk(r1911757) with expat
- OpenSSL 3.1.3, 3.0.11, 1.1.1w,
and for all except RHEL 9
also 1.1.1, 1.0.2u, 1.0.2
- expat 2.5.0
- pcre 10.42
- lua 5.4.6 (compiled with LUA_COMPAT_MODULE)
- libxml2 2.11.5
- libnghttp2 1.57.0
- brotli 1.1.0
- curl 8.4.0
- jansson 2.14
- libldap 2.6.6 (2.5.7 with OpenSSL 1.1.1,
2.4.59 with OpenSSL 1.0.2*)
- in total 200 builds per platform (80 for RHEL 9)
- Tool chain:
- platform gcc
- CFLAGS: -O2 -g -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing
All builds succeeded.
- compiler warnings:
- deprecation warnings when building against OpenSSL 3.1.3, see other
thread
Tested for
- SLES 11+12+15
- RHEL 6+7+8+9
- MPMs prefork, worker, event
- log level trace8
- Perl client bundle build against OpenSSL 3.1.0beta1-1,
3.0.0, 1.1.1g plus patches, 1.1.0l, 1.0.2u and 1.1.0l-1
(RHEL 9 3.1.2-1, 3.0.10-1, 1.1.1w-1)
Every OpenSSL version in the client tested with every OpenSSL version in
the server. 18 unit test runs (3 MPMS x 6 OpenSSL clients) per server build.
About 2.400 unit test runs are done, most with server OpenSSL 3.1 and
3.0, for RHEL 9 also 1.1.1.
Some local adjustments to tests were used:
- t/modules/buffer.t: removing huge buffer tests
- my $bigsize = 100000;
+ my $bigsize = 50000;
The following test failures were seen:
a t/modules/buffer.t line 37
Not a regression
Only on RHEL 6, SLES 11.
c t/modules/sed.t line 37 test 3
Not a regression
Only on RHEL 6, SLES 11.
Regards,
Rainer
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 11:10 AM Stefan Eissing via dev
<de...@httpd.apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again:
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58:
> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>
> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
> sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
> sha512: 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
>
> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate.
+1 AIX/xlc
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Posted by Dennis Clarke <dc...@blastwave.org>.
On 10/17/23 20:58, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 5:10 PM Stefan Eissing via dev
> <de...@httpd.apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
>> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58:
>
> [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
>
> Tested on Debian 12 and 13.
>
> Thanks for RMing Stefan!
>
I don't want to be picky here but when folks report the goodness
of a build on a given Linux or UNIX can we also please include the
architecture? I personally run stuff all the time on Itanium and the
IBM POWER9 and IBM POWER7 big-endian as well as some weird stuff like
the SiFive RISC-V and yes ... even some old SPARCv9 stuff. I would
love to be the geek running a web site on PA-RISC but that is really
just being obscure on purpose :)
--
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
UNIX and Linux spoken
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Posted by Yann Ylavic <yl...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 5:10 PM Stefan Eissing via dev
<de...@httpd.apache.org> wrote:
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58:
[X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
Tested on Debian 12 and 13.
Thanks for RMing Stefan!
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Posted by gi...@paclan.it.
On 10/16/23 17:08, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again:
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58:
> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>
> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
> sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
> sha512: 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
>
> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate.
>
+1
builds and works fine on OpenBSD 7.4 and Fedora 38.
Thanks for the RM.
Giovanni
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Posted by Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org>.
> Am 25.10.2023 um 16:56 schrieb David Zuelke <dz...@salesforce.com>:
>
> FYI, the https://httpd.apache.org front page still lists 2.4.57 as the latest version.
Not in my browser. And it was so already on release day. Something in your infrastructure delivering you old content?
>
> - David
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 5:09 PM Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org> wrote:
> With 8 +1 votes and no counters, this seems a go. If nothing else comes up, I'll do the release tomorrow noonish.
>
> Thanks all for the testing!
>
> Cheers,
> Stefan
>
> > Am 16.10.2023 um 17:08 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org>:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again:
> >
> > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
> >
> > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58:
> > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
> >
> > The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
> > sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
> > sha512: 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
> >
> > The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Stefan
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Posted by David Zuelke via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org>.
FYI, the https://httpd.apache.org front page still lists 2.4.57 as the
latest version.
- David
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 5:09 PM Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org>
wrote:
> With 8 +1 votes and no counters, this seems a go. If nothing else comes
> up, I'll do the release tomorrow noonish.
>
> Thanks all for the testing!
>
> Cheers,
> Stefan
>
> > Am 16.10.2023 um 17:08 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev <
> dev@httpd.apache.org>:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again:
> >
> > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
> >
> > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58:
> > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
> >
> > The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
> > sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6
> *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
> > sha512:
> 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3
> *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
> >
> > The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Stefan
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Posted by Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org>.
With 8 +1 votes and no counters, this seems a go. If nothing else comes up, I'll do the release tomorrow noonish.
Thanks all for the testing!
Cheers,
Stefan
> Am 16.10.2023 um 17:08 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev <de...@httpd.apache.org>:
>
> Hi all,
>
> after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again:
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58:
> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>
> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
> sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
> sha512: 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
>
> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate.
>
> Cheers,
> Stefan