You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mahout.apache.org by Isabel Drost <is...@apache.org> on 2009/12/03 15:03:46 UTC

Re: Publish code quality reports on web-site?

On Sun deneche abdelhakim <ad...@gmail.com> wrote:

> df/mapred works with the old hadoop API
> df/mapreduce works with hadoop 0.20 API

Hmm. Maybe it would still be possible to factor that code out that is
common to both implementations? That step might make migrating to a
future Hadoop version easier as well as only the API dependent code
would have to be changed.

Isabel

Re: Publish code quality reports on web-site?

Posted by deneche abdelhakim <ad...@gmail.com>.
I'm not planing to make new changes to 'mapred', my new code should go
to 'mapreduce'

On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Isabel Drost <is...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I suggest our current stance be that we use 0.20.x, with the old APIs.
>> When 0.21 comes out and stabilizes, we move. So I suggest keeping
>> these and deleting 'mapred' at that point.
>
> Sounds good to me.
>
> Isabel
>

Re: Publish code quality reports on web-site?

Posted by Isabel Drost <is...@apache.org>.
On Thu Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I suggest our current stance be that we use 0.20.x, with the old APIs.
> When 0.21 comes out and stabilizes, we move. So I suggest keeping
> these and deleting 'mapred' at that point.

Sounds good to me.

Isabel

Re: Publish code quality reports on web-site?

Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
I suggest our current stance be that we use 0.20.x, with the old APIs.
When 0.21 comes out and stabilizes, we move. So I suggest keeping
these and deleting 'mapred' at that point.

On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Isabel Drost <is...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Sun deneche abdelhakim <ad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> df/mapred works with the old hadoop API
>> df/mapreduce works with hadoop 0.20 API
>
> Hmm. Maybe it would still be possible to factor that code out that is
> common to both implementations? That step might make migrating to a
> future Hadoop version easier as well as only the API dependent code
> would have to be changed.
>
> Isabel
>