Re: 1.0 binariesry

[Ben Laurie <be...@gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk>]

> 
> 
> > 
> > One small problem with this scheme of things - there are two current versions
> > of SCO, under many names, but essentially know as SCO 3 and SCO 5. What do
> > you suggest for the binaries (I have recently installed SCO 5, which I must
> > say looks quite a lot nicer than 3, and so will be making binaries for both)?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Ben.
> 
> The only reason I would see to provide both is if:
> 
> 1) SCO 5 binaries will *not* run on SCO 3

ermm, dunno, I'll check it out

> 2) *and* there will be a number of people requesting SCO 3.

Likely, that is, if people request SCO at all.

Cheers,

Ben.


-- 
Ben Laurie                  Phone: +44 (181) 994 6435
Freelance Consultant        Fax:   +44 (181) 994 6472
and Technical Director      Email: ben@algroup.co.uk
A.L. Digital Ltd,           URL: http://www.algroup.co.uk
London, England.