You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@couchdb.apache.org by la...@talktalk.net on 2012/06/11 12:39:40 UTC

Keep getting message alarm_handler: {set,{system_memory_high_watermark,[]}}

Hello,


I'm newbie to couchdb
I have just installed it on my PC which is running Windows 7
I'm using a Dell Vostro with Intel(R) core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.1 GHz and 2.0GB memory
I'm getting errors on the erlang console with frequent "alarm_handler: {set,{system_memory_high_watermark,[]}} " 
When I run the verify test it passes. 
When I run the test suite though it fails as shown below:


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------






Name
Status
Elapsed Time
Details



basics
success
4849ms



all_docs
success
172ms



attachments
error
218ms

Run with debugger
Assertion failed: xhr.responseText == lorem
Exception raised: {}



attachments_multipart
success
101ms



attachment_names
success
30ms



attachment_paths
success
121ms



attachment_ranges
success
44ms



attachment_views
success
146ms



auth_cache
success
254ms



batch_save
success
594ms



bulk_docs
success
352ms



changes
success
2063ms



coffee
success
200ms



compact
success
2403ms



config
success
88ms



conflicts
success
132ms



content_negotiation
success
21ms



cookie_auth
success
192ms



copy_doc
success
42ms



delayed_commits
success
17571ms



design_docs
success
27616ms



design_options
success
97ms



design_paths
success
78ms



erlang_views
success
719ms



etags_head
success
52ms



etags_views
success
5252ms



form_submit
success
19ms



http
success
38ms



invalid_docids
success
68ms



jsonp
success
51ms



large_docs
success
53ms



list_views
failure
401ms

Run with debugger
Assertion 'xhr.status == 200, "standard get should be 200"' failed: standard get should be 200
Assertion failed: /head0123456789tail/.test(xhr.responseText)



lots_of_docs
success
187ms



method_override
success
37ms



multiple_rows
success
42ms



oauth
success
1324ms



oauth_users_db
success
116ms



proxyauth
success
73ms



purge
success
207ms



reader_acl
success
2421ms



recreate_doc
success
177ms



reduce
success
1655ms



reduce_builtin
success
2397ms



reduce_false
success
65ms



reduce_false_temp
success
34ms



replication
success
94105ms



replicator_db
failure
67550ms

Run with debugger
Assertion failed: copy === null
Assertion failed: expected 'null', got '{"_id":"foo666","_rev":"1-8f008c4354eb07d5fbfc399a84bc88a1","value":666}'



replicator_db_security
success
382ms



rev_stemming
failure
259ms

Run with debugger
Assertion failed: db.open("bar", {revs: true})._revisions.ids.length == newLimit + 1
Assertion failed: db.open("bar", {revs: true})._revisions.ids.length == newLimit + 1



rewrite
success
173ms



security_validation
success
786ms



show_documents
success
285ms



stats
success
6656ms



update_documents
success
335ms



users_db
success
110ms



users_db_security
success
277ms



utf8
success
67ms



uuids
success
153ms



view_collation
success
171ms



view_collation_raw
success
192ms



view_conflicts
success
108ms



view_compaction
failure
1005ms

Run with debugger
Assertion failed: resp.view_index.disk_size < disk_size_before_compact



view_errors
success
880ms



view_include_docs
success
219ms



view_multi_key_all_docs
success
65ms



view_multi_key_design
success
163ms



view_multi_key_temp
success
81ms



view_offsets
success
614ms



view_pagination
success
149ms



view_sandboxing
success
125ms



view_update_seq
success
5190ms



view_xml
success
45ms



Does anyone know how to get over this problem?



Re: Keep getting message alarm_handler: {set,{system_memory_high_watermark,[]}}

Posted by Robert Newson <ro...@gmail.com>.
The alarms can be ignored, they're a side-effect of a new feature in couchdb that monitors disk consumption.

The test suite failures below look like the usual ones caused by browser cache issues. Clear your cache and try again.

B.

On 11 Jun 2012, at 11:39, laurie.turpin@talktalk.net wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> 
> I'm newbie to couchdb
> I have just installed it on my PC which is running Windows 7
> I'm using a Dell Vostro with Intel(R) core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.1 GHz and 2.0GB memory
> I'm getting errors on the erlang console with frequent "alarm_handler: {set,{system_memory_high_watermark,[]}} " 
> When I run the verify test it passes. 
> When I run the test suite though it fails as shown below:
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Name
> Status
> Elapsed Time
> Details
> 
> 
> 
> basics
> success
> 4849ms
> 
> 
> 
> all_docs
> success
> 172ms
> 
> 
> 
> attachments
> error
> 218ms
> 
> Run with debugger
> Assertion failed: xhr.responseText == lorem
> Exception raised: {}
> 
> 
> 
> attachments_multipart
> success
> 101ms
> 
> 
> 
> attachment_names
> success
> 30ms
> 
> 
> 
> attachment_paths
> success
> 121ms
> 
> 
> 
> attachment_ranges
> success
> 44ms
> 
> 
> 
> attachment_views
> success
> 146ms
> 
> 
> 
> auth_cache
> success
> 254ms
> 
> 
> 
> batch_save
> success
> 594ms
> 
> 
> 
> bulk_docs
> success
> 352ms
> 
> 
> 
> changes
> success
> 2063ms
> 
> 
> 
> coffee
> success
> 200ms
> 
> 
> 
> compact
> success
> 2403ms
> 
> 
> 
> config
> success
> 88ms
> 
> 
> 
> conflicts
> success
> 132ms
> 
> 
> 
> content_negotiation
> success
> 21ms
> 
> 
> 
> cookie_auth
> success
> 192ms
> 
> 
> 
> copy_doc
> success
> 42ms
> 
> 
> 
> delayed_commits
> success
> 17571ms
> 
> 
> 
> design_docs
> success
> 27616ms
> 
> 
> 
> design_options
> success
> 97ms
> 
> 
> 
> design_paths
> success
> 78ms
> 
> 
> 
> erlang_views
> success
> 719ms
> 
> 
> 
> etags_head
> success
> 52ms
> 
> 
> 
> etags_views
> success
> 5252ms
> 
> 
> 
> form_submit
> success
> 19ms
> 
> 
> 
> http
> success
> 38ms
> 
> 
> 
> invalid_docids
> success
> 68ms
> 
> 
> 
> jsonp
> success
> 51ms
> 
> 
> 
> large_docs
> success
> 53ms
> 
> 
> 
> list_views
> failure
> 401ms
> 
> Run with debugger
> Assertion 'xhr.status == 200, "standard get should be 200"' failed: standard get should be 200
> Assertion failed: /head0123456789tail/.test(xhr.responseText)
> 
> 
> 
> lots_of_docs
> success
> 187ms
> 
> 
> 
> method_override
> success
> 37ms
> 
> 
> 
> multiple_rows
> success
> 42ms
> 
> 
> 
> oauth
> success
> 1324ms
> 
> 
> 
> oauth_users_db
> success
> 116ms
> 
> 
> 
> proxyauth
> success
> 73ms
> 
> 
> 
> purge
> success
> 207ms
> 
> 
> 
> reader_acl
> success
> 2421ms
> 
> 
> 
> recreate_doc
> success
> 177ms
> 
> 
> 
> reduce
> success
> 1655ms
> 
> 
> 
> reduce_builtin
> success
> 2397ms
> 
> 
> 
> reduce_false
> success
> 65ms
> 
> 
> 
> reduce_false_temp
> success
> 34ms
> 
> 
> 
> replication
> success
> 94105ms
> 
> 
> 
> replicator_db
> failure
> 67550ms
> 
> Run with debugger
> Assertion failed: copy === null
> Assertion failed: expected 'null', got '{"_id":"foo666","_rev":"1-8f008c4354eb07d5fbfc399a84bc88a1","value":666}'
> 
> 
> 
> replicator_db_security
> success
> 382ms
> 
> 
> 
> rev_stemming
> failure
> 259ms
> 
> Run with debugger
> Assertion failed: db.open("bar", {revs: true})._revisions.ids.length == newLimit + 1
> Assertion failed: db.open("bar", {revs: true})._revisions.ids.length == newLimit + 1
> 
> 
> 
> rewrite
> success
> 173ms
> 
> 
> 
> security_validation
> success
> 786ms
> 
> 
> 
> show_documents
> success
> 285ms
> 
> 
> 
> stats
> success
> 6656ms
> 
> 
> 
> update_documents
> success
> 335ms
> 
> 
> 
> users_db
> success
> 110ms
> 
> 
> 
> users_db_security
> success
> 277ms
> 
> 
> 
> utf8
> success
> 67ms
> 
> 
> 
> uuids
> success
> 153ms
> 
> 
> 
> view_collation
> success
> 171ms
> 
> 
> 
> view_collation_raw
> success
> 192ms
> 
> 
> 
> view_conflicts
> success
> 108ms
> 
> 
> 
> view_compaction
> failure
> 1005ms
> 
> Run with debugger
> Assertion failed: resp.view_index.disk_size < disk_size_before_compact
> 
> 
> 
> view_errors
> success
> 880ms
> 
> 
> 
> view_include_docs
> success
> 219ms
> 
> 
> 
> view_multi_key_all_docs
> success
> 65ms
> 
> 
> 
> view_multi_key_design
> success
> 163ms
> 
> 
> 
> view_multi_key_temp
> success
> 81ms
> 
> 
> 
> view_offsets
> success
> 614ms
> 
> 
> 
> view_pagination
> success
> 149ms
> 
> 
> 
> view_sandboxing
> success
> 125ms
> 
> 
> 
> view_update_seq
> success
> 5190ms
> 
> 
> 
> view_xml
> success
> 45ms
> 
> 
> 
> Does anyone know how to get over this problem?
> 
> 


Re: Keep getting message alarm_handler: {set,{system_memory_high_watermark,[]}}

Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <da...@muse.net.nz>.
On 11 June 2012 12:39,  <la...@talktalk.net> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I'm newbie to couchdb
> I have just installed it on my PC which is running Windows 7

Doubly welcome :-).

> I'm using a Dell Vostro with Intel(R) core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.1 GHz and 2.0GB memory
> I'm getting errors on the erlang console with frequent "alarm_handler: {set,{system_memory_high_watermark,[]}} "
> When I run the verify test it passes.
> When I run the test suite though it fails as shown below:

I'd not get too concerned around these, it seems often we are testing
the browser rather than CouchDB. Also make sure you're testing with
Firefox, rather than IE. More notes on that here
http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Windows_Binary_Packages#Testing.

A+
Dave


A+
Dave