You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by kf...@collab.net on 2004/10/14 14:16:47 UTC
Re: Externals clutter "svn status" output [was: Externals in Spanish Translation?]
Julian Foad <ju...@btopenworld.com> writes:
> If the output of "svn status" is cluttered when externals are in use,
> then that is a problem and we should unclutter it. Yes? (One can
> always use "svn status --verbose" to check whether it is actually
> traversing the externals if one is not sure.)
Yes, but let's also keep in mind that's a separate issue from the
current one. Even if svn:externals were better, we still wouldn't
want to be using them in the translations directory.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Externals clutter "svn status" output [was: Externals in Spanish
Translation?]
Posted by Julian Foad <ju...@btopenworld.com>.
I (Julian Foad) wrote:
> kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>> Yes, but let's also keep in mind that's a separate issue from the
>> current one. Even if svn:externals were better, we still wouldn't
>> want to be using them in the translations directory.
>
> Agreed. That's why I changed the Subject line :-)
... but maybe just changing the Subject line wasn't enough to indicate
clearly that I was raising a separate issue rather than claiming that
this is the proper interpretation of the original issue. I'll try to be
clearer next time.
- Julian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Externals clutter "svn status" output [was: Externals in Spanish
Translation?]
Posted by Julian Foad <ju...@btopenworld.com>.
kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> Julian Foad <ju...@btopenworld.com> writes:
>
>>If the output of "svn status" is cluttered when externals are in use,
>>then that is a problem and we should unclutter it. Yes? (One can
>>always use "svn status --verbose" to check whether it is actually
>>traversing the externals if one is not sure.)
>
> Yes, but let's also keep in mind that's a separate issue from the
> current one. Even if svn:externals were better, we still wouldn't
> want to be using them in the translations directory.
Agreed. That's why I changed the Subject line :-)
- Julian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org