You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-user@hadoop.apache.org by lulynn_2008 <lu...@163.com> on 2011/08/07 17:56:56 UTC
Could pig-0.8.1 work with Hbase 0.90.3?
Hello,
I found pig-0.8.1 included classes of Hbase-0.90.0.
My question is:
1. If I replace Hbase-0.90.3 with Hbase-0.90.0, could pig-0.8.1 work normally?
2. why Hbase class files are included in pig-0.8.1 jar ball?
Thank you.
Re: Could pig-0.8.1 work with Hbase 0.90.3?
Posted by Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com>.
1. The HBase client from any 0.90.x should be compatible across all 0.90.x
versions.
2. No idea.
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 8:56 AM, lulynn_2008 <lu...@163.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> I found pig-0.8.1 included classes of Hbase-0.90.0.
> My question is:
> 1. If I replace Hbase-0.90.3 with Hbase-0.90.0, could pig-0.8.1 work
> normally?
> 2. why Hbase class files are included in pig-0.8.1 jar ball?
> Thank you.
>
Re: Could pig-0.8.1 work with Hbase 0.90.3?
Posted by Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com>.
1. The HBase client from any 0.90.x should be compatible across all 0.90.x
versions.
2. No idea.
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 8:56 AM, lulynn_2008 <lu...@163.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> I found pig-0.8.1 included classes of Hbase-0.90.0.
> My question is:
> 1. If I replace Hbase-0.90.3 with Hbase-0.90.0, could pig-0.8.1 work
> normally?
> 2. why Hbase class files are included in pig-0.8.1 jar ball?
> Thank you.
>
Re:Re: Could pig-0.8.1 work with Hbase 0.90.3?
Posted by lulynn_2008 <lu...@163.com>.
Bill Graham,
Thank you for your quick response.
At 2011-08-08 00:11:54,"Bill Graham" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Yes, you can a different version of HBase provided it's >= 0.89.
>
>2011/8/7 lulynn_2008 <lu...@163.com>
>
>> Hello,
>> I found pig-0.8.1 included classes of Hbase-0.90.0.
>> My question is:
>> 1. If I replace Hbase-0.90.3 with Hbase-0.90.0, could pig-0.8.1 work
>> normally?
>> 2. why Hbase class files are included in pig-0.8.1 jar ball?
>> Thank you.
>>
Re:Re: Could pig-0.8.1 work with Hbase 0.90.3?
Posted by lulynn_2008 <lu...@163.com>.
Dmitriy Ryaboy,
Thank you for your quick response.
At 2011-08-08 05:54:53,"Dmitriy Ryaboy" <dv...@gmail.com> wrote:
>To answer question 2: because people got extremely confused and upset when
>we told them they have to actually put hbase on their classpath to talk to
>hbase.... They want it to work out of the box.
>
>
>On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Bill Graham <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, you can a different version of HBase provided it's >= 0.89.
>>
>> 2011/8/7 lulynn_2008 <lu...@163.com>
>>
>> > Hello,
>> > I found pig-0.8.1 included classes of Hbase-0.90.0.
>> > My question is:
>> > 1. If I replace Hbase-0.90.3 with Hbase-0.90.0, could pig-0.8.1 work
>> > normally?
>> > 2. why Hbase class files are included in pig-0.8.1 jar ball?
>> > Thank you.
>> >
>>
Re: Could pig-0.8.1 work with Hbase 0.90.3?
Posted by Dmitriy Ryaboy <dv...@gmail.com>.
To answer question 2: because people got extremely confused and upset when
we told them they have to actually put hbase on their classpath to talk to
hbase.... They want it to work out of the box.
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Bill Graham <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, you can a different version of HBase provided it's >= 0.89.
>
> 2011/8/7 lulynn_2008 <lu...@163.com>
>
> > Hello,
> > I found pig-0.8.1 included classes of Hbase-0.90.0.
> > My question is:
> > 1. If I replace Hbase-0.90.3 with Hbase-0.90.0, could pig-0.8.1 work
> > normally?
> > 2. why Hbase class files are included in pig-0.8.1 jar ball?
> > Thank you.
> >
>
Re: Could pig-0.8.1 work with Hbase 0.90.3?
Posted by Bill Graham <bi...@gmail.com>.
Yes, you can a different version of HBase provided it's >= 0.89.
2011/8/7 lulynn_2008 <lu...@163.com>
> Hello,
> I found pig-0.8.1 included classes of Hbase-0.90.0.
> My question is:
> 1. If I replace Hbase-0.90.3 with Hbase-0.90.0, could pig-0.8.1 work
> normally?
> 2. why Hbase class files are included in pig-0.8.1 jar ball?
> Thank you.
>