You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Erwan <ar...@free.fr> on 2008/08/01 20:34:40 UTC
Re: writing binding extension to integrate JBI BC
Hi,
You may also take a look to the following document which deals with SCA
integration in PETALS ESB (JBI) Compliant.
Approach seems to be SCA as a JBI Service Engine.
http://www.ow2.org/xwiki/bin/download/Events/OW2QuarterlyMeetingGrenobleFrance/SCAwithPEtALS_05_15_2008.pdf
Hope mailling MessageId will work since I suscribed/get the
message/replied in order to follow the thread
Regards,
Erwan
Raymond Feng a écrit :
> <div class="moz-text-flowed" style="font-family: -moz-fixed">Hi,
>
> The following JavaOne session may give you a good idea to start. I
> believe the two presenters have done some work. It would be nice to
> see them come aboard to join the efforts.
>
> http://developers.sun.com/learning/javaoneonline/2008/pdf/TS-5870.pdf
>
> Here is a summary of the analogy of the concepts between SCA and JBI.
>
> SCA JBI
> ----------------------- ------------------------------
> Implementation SE (Service Engine)
> Binding BC (Binding Component)
> Composite SA (Service Assembly)
> Component SU (Service Unit)
> Service SU Provides
> Reference SU Consumes
> Wire Connection
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Charuka Jayarathna" <ch...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 3:24 PM
> To: <de...@tuscany.apache.org>
> Subject: writing binding extension to integrate JBI BC
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am trying to integrate JBI with Tuscany. I followed Apache
>> implementation of JBI , "servicemix" to get familiar with a JBI
>> implementation. I would like to clarify following before proceeding
>> any further. I appreciate your guide and thoughts. Please correct me
>> if I am not going the correct direction.
>>
>> In the proposal, you suggest to write a tuscany binding extension to
>> run a JBI binding component. Does that mean to transfer any specific
>> binding type defined according to JBI standard to one protocol type so
>> that tuscany runtime could handle the binding type?.
>>
>> thank you
>> charuka
>
> </div>
>
Re: writing binding extension to integrate JBI BC
Posted by Charuka Jayarathna <ch...@gmail.com>.
Hi Erwan,
THanks for the document.
Charuka
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Erwan <ar...@free.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
> You may also take a look to the following document which deals with SCAHi
> integration in PETALS ESB (JBI) Compliant.
> Approach seems to be SCA as a JBI Service Engine.
>
> http://www.ow2.org/xwiki/bin/download/Events/OW2QuarterlyMeetingGrenobleFrance/SCAwithPEtALS_05_15_2008.pdf
>
> Hope mailling MessageId will work since I suscribed/get the message/replied
> in order to follow the thread
>
> Regards,
> Erwan
>
> Raymond Feng a écrit :
>>
>> <div class="moz-text-flowed" style="font-family: -moz-fixed">Hi,
>>
>> The following JavaOne session may give you a good idea to start. I believe
>> the two presenters have done some work. It would be nice to see them come
>> aboard to join the efforts.
>>
>> http://developers.sun.com/learning/javaoneonline/2008/pdf/TS-5870.pdf
>>
>> Here is a summary of the analogy of the concepts between SCA and JBI.
>>
>> SCA JBI
>> ----------------------- ------------------------------
>> Implementation SE (Service Engine)
>> Binding BC (Binding Component)
>> Composite SA (Service Assembly)
>> Component SU (Service Unit)
>> Service SU Provides
>> Reference SU Consumes
>> Wire Connection
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Raymond
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Charuka Jayarathna" <ch...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 3:24 PM
>> To: <de...@tuscany.apache.org>
>> Subject: writing binding extension to integrate JBI BC
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am trying to integrate JBI with Tuscany. I followed Apache
>>> implementation of JBI , "servicemix" to get familiar with a JBI
>>> implementation. I would like to clarify following before proceeding
>>> any further. I appreciate your guide and thoughts. Please correct me
>>> if I am not going the correct direction.
>>>
>>> In the proposal, you suggest to write a tuscany binding extension to
>>> run a JBI binding component. Does that mean to transfer any specific
>>> binding type defined according to JBI standard to one protocol type so
>>> that tuscany runtime could handle the binding type?.
>>>
>>> thank you
>>> charuka
>>
>> </div>
>>
>