You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@rocketmq.apache.org by yukon <yu...@apache.org> on 2017/02/16 05:46:08 UTC
[VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating) (RC3)
Hello Incubator PMC,
The Apache RocketMQ community has voted and approved the proposal to
release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0 (incubating). We now kindly request the IPMC
review and vote on this incubator release.
[VOTE] Thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/349e3268cf5ae7ec65d1cd584362c76bd11f86afb935b2bfb8ee6b6b@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E
[RESULT][VOTE] Thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6487e8afc7a71cbdf9848d1270997ec55ffe6cb9e7a2ddfce2bedb35@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E
The RC3 artifacts:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/rocketmq/4.0.0-incubating-rc3/
Git tag for the release:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/tree/rocketmq-4.0.0-incubating
Hash for the release tag:
dddc3daa2cbec4c7240d6525d2ce198826d29967
Release Notes:
http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-4.0.0-incubating/
The artifacts have been signed with Key : E9BDDB0E, which can be found in
the keys file:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/rocketmq/KEYS
The maven release artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1003
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
votes are reached.
Please vote accordingly:
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
Here is my +1
Thanks,
The Apache RocketMQ Team
Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating) (RC3)
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> Note things like the broad copyright dates.
Yep agreed that’s more than a bit silly. We’ll see what we can do to fix that.
> Any plans to reach out to get it corrected, or try to upgrade if they
> already fixed?
We can ask. If a change was made BTW that would effect a number of other projects. This would include NiFi and Spark (from a casual glance/search of Apache GitHub). Not to single out any particular project or suggest that they need to change their license just noticing it would have a wider impact than this incubating project.
Thanks,
Justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating) (RC3)
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Justin,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 7:45 PM Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > - README points to "rocketmq community" as a github page
>
> Yes they are aware this is an issue.
>
> > - fastjson (missing NOTICE)
>
> Why is this an issue? Fastjson is mentioned in LICENSE and the 3rd party
> repo contains no NOTICE file (which is rather common sadly).
>
This is what I see in fastjson's NOTICE file (its within the JAR)
/*
* Copyright 1999-2101 Alibaba Group.
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/
Note things like the broad copyright dates. However, knowing the
relationship to rocketmq, may be good to reach out to get a valid NOTICE
file put together.
>
> > - commons-cli (missing NOTICE)
>
> The commons cli doesn’t contain anything that needs to be propagated into
> our NOTICE AFAICS.
>
>
Yep agreed, I missed that point in
http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#bundle-asf-product
> > - NOTICE points to non-existent file LICENSE.<component>.txt
>
> We missed that, but it is referring to dependancies that not are not
> bundled. I’d suggest to fix we just remove that paragraph.
>
Agreed.
>
> > - LICENSE-BIN mentions “ASL2"
>
> This is because an Apache commons (probably incorrectly) project we bundle
> has this in it’s NOTICE file.
>
>
Any plans to reach out to get it corrected, or try to upgrade if they
already fixed?
> Thanks,
> Justin
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating) (RC3)
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> - README points to "rocketmq community" as a github page
Yes they are aware this is an issue.
> - fastjson (missing NOTICE)
Why is this an issue? Fastjson is mentioned in LICENSE and the 3rd party repo contains no NOTICE file (which is rather common sadly).
> - commons-cli (missing NOTICE)
The commons cli doesn’t contain anything that needs to be propagated into our NOTICE AFAICS.
> - NOTICE points to non-existent file LICENSE.<component>.txt
We missed that, but it is referring to dependancies that not are not bundled. I’d suggest to fix we just remove that paragraph.
> - LICENSE-BIN mentions “ASL2"
This is because an Apache commons (probably incorrectly) project we bundle has this in it’s NOTICE file.
Thanks,
Justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating) (RC3)
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> - README points to "rocketmq community" as a github page
Yes they are aware this is an issue.
> - fastjson (missing NOTICE)
Why is this an issue? Fastjson is mentioned in LICENSE and the 3rd party repo contains no NOTICE file (which is rather common sadly).
> - commons-cli (missing NOTICE)
The commons cli doesn’t contain anything than need to be propagated into our NOTICE AFAICS.
> - NOTICE points to non-existent file LICENSE.<component>.txt
We missed that, but it is referring to dependancies not are not bundled. I’d suggest to fix we just remove that paragraph.
> - LICENSE-BIN mentions “ASL2"
This is because an Apache commons (probably incorrectly) project we bindle has this in it’s NOTICE file.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating) (RC3)
Posted by Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>.
> IMO it best to follow current documentation than copy what other projects may of done.
Agreed. That’s why i hope some clear official documentation to be polished, rather than scatter in every apache project :-)
BTW, in order to help our guys, we also arrange 2 articles in website about apache PR best practice[1] and distribution process[2] following our mentor justin guidance endeavor in many apache projects. and continue to polish these guidance. I hope we can offer help or feedback If official documentations need to be polished in these points.
[1] http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/docs/pull-request/ <http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/docs/pull-request/>
[2] http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/docs/release-manual <http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/docs/release-manual>
> 在 2017年2月17日，14:47，Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> 写道：
>
> Hi,
>
>> I also want to know the correct distribution about NOTICE and LICENSE. also including the LICENSE and LICENSE-BIN(why we must list the 2 different license files when in source and bundle)..
>
> As explained on the dev list you need different NOTICE and LICENSE files because their contents are different.
>
>> it seems to different in many apache projects .we are confused when refering these projects )
>
> There's not always consistency among projects and there are often multiple ways of dealing with the some issue. In a few cases policy or best practice has changed over time and the project has not kept up to date. IMO it best to follow current documentation than copy what other projects may of done.
>
>> IMO, if have some clear guide for this problem. may be a good help for our incubator project :-)
>
> The best guidance that I know of can be find here [1] and in the legal how to. [2]
>
> This example I made some time ago may also help. [3][4]
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html
> 2. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved
> 3. https://github.com/justinmclean/ApacheWombat
> 4. https://vimeo.com/iotsydney/apachewombat
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating) (RC3)
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> I also want to know the correct distribution about NOTICE and LICENSE. also including the LICENSE and LICENSE-BIN(why we must list the 2 different license files when in source and bundle)..
As explained on the dev list you need different NOTICE and LICENSE files because their contents are different.
> it seems to different in many apache projects .we are confused when refering these projects )
There's not always consistency among projects and there are often multiple ways of dealing with the some issue. In a few cases policy or best practice has changed over time and the project has not kept up to date. IMO it best to follow current documentation than copy what other projects may of done.
> IMO, if have some clear guide for this problem. may be a good help for our incubator project :-)
The best guidance that I know of can be find here [1] and in the legal how to. [2]
This example I made some time ago may also help. [3][4]
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html
2. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved
3. https://github.com/justinmclean/ApacheWombat
4. https://vimeo.com/iotsydney/apachewombat
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating) (RC3)
Posted by Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>.
I also want to know the correct distribution about NOTICE and LICENSE. also including the LICENSE and LICENSE-BIN(why we must list the 2 different license files when in source and bundle. it seems to different in many apache projects .we are confused when refering these projects )
IMO, if have some clear guide for this problem. may be a good help for our incubator project :-)
> 在 2017年2月17日，08:27，John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> 写道：
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:32 PM Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> No showstopper issues found, only minor issues that will be ironed out in
>> subsequent releases (e.g., README needs some cleanup, need consistency in
>> artifact naming).
>>
>
> Do you have a full list of those issues? Here's problems I see
> (non-exhaustive):
>
> - README points to "rocketmq community" as a github page
> - LICENSE/NOTICE are not consistent for the bin files. (there should be
> more apache licensed stuff in the bin than actually present)
> - fastjson (missing NOTICE)
> - commons-cli (missing NOTICE)
> - NOTICE points to non-existent file LICENSE.<component>.txt
> - LICENSE-BIN mentions "ASL2"
>
> Assuming this is your list, I'm OK with a +1.
>
> John
>
>
>
>>
>> Bruce
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:46 PM, yukon <yu...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Incubator PMC,
>>>
>>> The Apache RocketMQ community has voted and approved the proposal to
>>> release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0 (incubating). We now kindly request the
>> IPMC
>>> review and vote on this incubator release.
>>>
>>> [VOTE] Thread:
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/349e3268cf5ae7ec65d1cd584362c7
>>> 6bd11f86afb935b2bfb8ee6b6b@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E
>>>
>>> [RESULT][VOTE] Thread:
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6487e8afc7a71cbdf9848d1270997e
>>> c55ffe6cb9e7a2ddfce2bedb35@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E
>>>
>>> The RC3 artifacts:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/rocketmq/4.
>>> 0.0-incubating-rc3/
>>>
>>> Git tag for the release:
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/tree/
>>> rocketmq-4.0.0-incubating
>>>
>>> Hash for the release tag:
>>> dddc3daa2cbec4c7240d6525d2ce198826d29967
>>>
>>> Release Notes:
>>> http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-4.0.0-
>>> incubating/
>>>
>>> The artifacts have been signed with Key : E9BDDB0E, which can be found in
>>> the keys file:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/rocketmq/KEYS
>>>
>>> The maven release artifacts:
>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1003
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
>>> votes are reached.
>>>
>>> Please vote accordingly:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>>
>>> Here is my +1
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> perl -e 'print
>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
>>
>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
>> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating) (RC3)
Posted by Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>.
I also want to know the correct distribution about NOTICE and LICENSE. also including the LICENSE and LICENSE-BIN(why we must list the 2 different license files when in source and bundle. it seems to different in many apache projects .we are confused when refering these projects )
IMO, if have some clear guide for this problem. may be a good help for our incubator project :-)
> 在 2017年2月17日，08:27，John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> 写道：
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:32 PM Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> No showstopper issues found, only minor issues that will be ironed out in
>> subsequent releases (e.g., README needs some cleanup, need consistency in
>> artifact naming).
>>
>
> Do you have a full list of those issues? Here's problems I see
> (non-exhaustive):
>
> - README points to "rocketmq community" as a github page
> - LICENSE/NOTICE are not consistent for the bin files. (there should be
> more apache licensed stuff in the bin than actually present)
> - fastjson (missing NOTICE)
> - commons-cli (missing NOTICE)
> - NOTICE points to non-existent file LICENSE.<component>.txt
> - LICENSE-BIN mentions "ASL2"
>
> Assuming this is your list, I'm OK with a +1.
>
> John
>
>
>
>>
>> Bruce
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:46 PM, yukon <yu...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Incubator PMC,
>>>
>>> The Apache RocketMQ community has voted and approved the proposal to
>>> release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0 (incubating). We now kindly request the
>> IPMC
>>> review and vote on this incubator release.
>>>
>>> [VOTE] Thread:
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/349e3268cf5ae7ec65d1cd584362c7
>>> 6bd11f86afb935b2bfb8ee6b6b@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E
>>>
>>> [RESULT][VOTE] Thread:
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6487e8afc7a71cbdf9848d1270997e
>>> c55ffe6cb9e7a2ddfce2bedb35@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E
>>>
>>> The RC3 artifacts:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/rocketmq/4.
>>> 0.0-incubating-rc3/
>>>
>>> Git tag for the release:
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/tree/
>>> rocketmq-4.0.0-incubating
>>>
>>> Hash for the release tag:
>>> dddc3daa2cbec4c7240d6525d2ce198826d29967
>>>
>>> Release Notes:
>>> http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-4.0.0-
>>> incubating/
>>>
>>> The artifacts have been signed with Key : E9BDDB0E, which can be found in
>>> the keys file:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/rocketmq/KEYS
>>>
>>> The maven release artifacts:
>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1003
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
>>> votes are reached.
>>>
>>> Please vote accordingly:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>>
>>> Here is my +1
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> perl -e 'print
>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
>>
>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
>> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>>
Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating) (RC3)
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:32 PM Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> No showstopper issues found, only minor issues that will be ironed out in
> subsequent releases (e.g., README needs some cleanup, need consistency in
> artifact naming).
>
Do you have a full list of those issues? Here's problems I see
(non-exhaustive):
- README points to "rocketmq community" as a github page
- LICENSE/NOTICE are not consistent for the bin files. (there should be
more apache licensed stuff in the bin than actually present)
- fastjson (missing NOTICE)
- commons-cli (missing NOTICE)
- NOTICE points to non-existent file LICENSE.<component>.txt
- LICENSE-BIN mentions "ASL2"
Assuming this is your list, I'm OK with a +1.
John
>
> Bruce
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:46 PM, yukon <yu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello Incubator PMC,
> >
> > The Apache RocketMQ community has voted and approved the proposal to
> > release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0 (incubating). We now kindly request the
> IPMC
> > review and vote on this incubator release.
> >
> > [VOTE] Thread:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/349e3268cf5ae7ec65d1cd584362c7
> > 6bd11f86afb935b2bfb8ee6b6b@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E
> >
> > [RESULT][VOTE] Thread:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6487e8afc7a71cbdf9848d1270997e
> > c55ffe6cb9e7a2ddfce2bedb35@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E
> >
> > The RC3 artifacts:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/rocketmq/4.
> > 0.0-incubating-rc3/
> >
> > Git tag for the release:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/tree/
> > rocketmq-4.0.0-incubating
> >
> > Hash for the release tag:
> > dddc3daa2cbec4c7240d6525d2ce198826d29967
> >
> > Release Notes:
> > http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-4.0.0-
> > incubating/
> >
> > The artifacts have been signed with Key : E9BDDB0E, which can be found in
> > the keys file:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/rocketmq/KEYS
> >
> > The maven release artifacts:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1003
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> > votes are reached.
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > Here is my +1
> >
> > Thanks,
> > The Apache RocketMQ Team
> >
>
>
>
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
>
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>
Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating) (RC3)
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:32 PM Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> No showstopper issues found, only minor issues that will be ironed out in
> subsequent releases (e.g., README needs some cleanup, need consistency in
> artifact naming).
>
Do you have a full list of those issues? Here's problems I see
(non-exhaustive):
- README points to "rocketmq community" as a github page
- LICENSE/NOTICE are not consistent for the bin files. (there should be
more apache licensed stuff in the bin than actually present)
- fastjson (missing NOTICE)
- commons-cli (missing NOTICE)
- NOTICE points to non-existent file LICENSE.<component>.txt
- LICENSE-BIN mentions "ASL2"
Assuming this is your list, I'm OK with a +1.
John
>
> Bruce
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:46 PM, yukon <yu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello Incubator PMC,
> >
> > The Apache RocketMQ community has voted and approved the proposal to
> > release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0 (incubating). We now kindly request the
> IPMC
> > review and vote on this incubator release.
> >
> > [VOTE] Thread:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/349e3268cf5ae7ec65d1cd584362c7
> > 6bd11f86afb935b2bfb8ee6b6b@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E
> >
> > [RESULT][VOTE] Thread:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6487e8afc7a71cbdf9848d1270997e
> > c55ffe6cb9e7a2ddfce2bedb35@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E
> >
> > The RC3 artifacts:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/rocketmq/4.
> > 0.0-incubating-rc3/
> >
> > Git tag for the release:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/tree/
> > rocketmq-4.0.0-incubating
> >
> > Hash for the release tag:
> > dddc3daa2cbec4c7240d6525d2ce198826d29967
> >
> > Release Notes:
> > http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-4.0.0-
> > incubating/
> >
> > The artifacts have been signed with Key : E9BDDB0E, which can be found in
> > the keys file:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/rocketmq/KEYS
> >
> > The maven release artifacts:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1003
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> > votes are reached.
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > Here is my +1
> >
> > Thanks,
> > The Apache RocketMQ Team
> >
>
>
>
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
>
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>
Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating) (RC3)
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
No showstopper issues found, only minor issues that will be ironed out in
subsequent releases (e.g., README needs some cleanup, need consistency in
artifact naming).
Bruce
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:46 PM, yukon <yu...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache RocketMQ community has voted and approved the proposal to
> release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0 (incubating). We now kindly request the IPMC
> review and vote on this incubator release.
>
> [VOTE] Thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/349e3268cf5ae7ec65d1cd584362c7
> 6bd11f86afb935b2bfb8ee6b6b@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E
>
> [RESULT][VOTE] Thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6487e8afc7a71cbdf9848d1270997e
> c55ffe6cb9e7a2ddfce2bedb35@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E
>
> The RC3 artifacts:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/rocketmq/4.
> 0.0-incubating-rc3/
>
> Git tag for the release:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/tree/
> rocketmq-4.0.0-incubating
>
> Hash for the release tag:
> dddc3daa2cbec4c7240d6525d2ce198826d29967
>
> Release Notes:
> http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-4.0.0-
> incubating/
>
> The artifacts have been signed with Key : E9BDDB0E, which can be found in
> the keys file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/rocketmq/KEYS
>
> The maven release artifacts:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1003
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Here is my +1
>
> Thanks,
> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>
--
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating) (RC3)
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> On 16 Feb 2017, at 6:05 pm, vintagewang <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1 binding
Not a binding vote as only incubator PMC members votes are binding here as explained on the Apache RocketMQ dev list.
While I appreciate the enthusiasm can Apache RocketMQ PPMC members please not vote here, especially if you have already voted on the dev list.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating) (RC3)
Posted by vintagewang <vi...@apache.org>.
+1 binding
Windows users is a very large user groups, especially in the trial product
user groups, it is necessary to increase the windows boot mode[1]
We can finish it next release.
1.https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ROCKETMQ-102
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding (carried over from dev list)
>
> All the usual things checked for only a couple of minor issue found the
> convenience binary is missing an EPL license and IMO the README needs some
> work.
>
> The RocketMQ website [1]also needs some incubator branding (missing
> disclaimer for instance) but the PPMC are are of that.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1.http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating) (RC3)
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
+1 binding (carried over from dev list)
All the usual things checked for only a couple of minor issue found the convenience binary is missing an EPL license and IMO the README needs some work.
The RocketMQ website [1]also needs some incubator branding (missing disclaimer for instance) but the PPMC are are of that.
Thanks,
Justin
1.http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating) (RC3)
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
No showstopper issues found, only minor issues that will be ironed out in
subsequent releases (e.g., README needs some cleanup, need consistency in
artifact naming).
Bruce
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:46 PM, yukon <yu...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache RocketMQ community has voted and approved the proposal to
> release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0 (incubating). We now kindly request the IPMC
> review and vote on this incubator release.
>
> [VOTE] Thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/349e3268cf5ae7ec65d1cd584362c7
> 6bd11f86afb935b2bfb8ee6b6b@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E
>
> [RESULT][VOTE] Thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6487e8afc7a71cbdf9848d1270997e
> c55ffe6cb9e7a2ddfce2bedb35@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E
>
> The RC3 artifacts:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/rocketmq/4.
> 0.0-incubating-rc3/
>
> Git tag for the release:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/tree/
> rocketmq-4.0.0-incubating
>
> Hash for the release tag:
> dddc3daa2cbec4c7240d6525d2ce198826d29967
>
> Release Notes:
> http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-4.0.0-
> incubating/
>
> The artifacts have been signed with Key : E9BDDB0E, which can be found in
> the keys file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/rocketmq/KEYS
>
> The maven release artifacts:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1003
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Here is my +1
>
> Thanks,
> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>
--
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder