You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wink.apache.org by "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com> on 2009/07/21 15:52:15 UTC
[DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
I would like to discuss Wink distribution layout.
The Incubator insists<http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases> that artifacts for {podling} are contained within www.apache.org/dist/incubator/{podling}<http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/%7bpodling%7d>. A podling is free to choose a suitable layout for its released artifacts.
My proposal for Wink distribution layout is as follows:
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/wink
- Version (e.g. '0.1-incubating')
o apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip
o apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.zip
o apache-wink-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
o apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip will be in the same layout as https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/wink/wink-dist/0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT/wink-dist-0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.zip
What do you think?
--martin
Re: [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Looks right to me.
--jason
On Jul 21, 2009, at 8:58 PM, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote:
> Clarification, version number is a root folder
>
> -0.1-incubating
> -- apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip
> -- apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.zip
> -- apache-wink-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
> -- apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Snitkovsky, Martin
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 4:52 PM
> To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
>
> I would like to discuss Wink distribution layout.
> The Incubator insists<http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
> > that artifacts for {podling} are contained within www.apache.org/dist/incubator/
> {podling}<http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/%7bpodling%7d>. A
> podling is free to choose a suitable layout for its released
> artifacts.
>
> My proposal for Wink distribution layout is as follows:
>
> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/wink
>
> - Version (e.g. '0.1-incubating')
>
> o apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip
>
> o apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.zip
>
> o apache-wink-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
>
> o apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
>
> apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip will be in the same layout as https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/wink/wink-dist/0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT/wink-dist-0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.zip
>
> What do you think?
>
> --martin
RE: [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
Posted by "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>.
Clarification, version number is a root folder
-0.1-incubating
-- apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip
-- apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.zip
-- apache-wink-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
-- apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
-----Original Message-----
From: Snitkovsky, Martin
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 4:52 PM
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
I would like to discuss Wink distribution layout.
The Incubator insists<http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases> that artifacts for {podling} are contained within www.apache.org/dist/incubator/{podling}<http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/%7bpodling%7d>. A podling is free to choose a suitable layout for its released artifacts.
My proposal for Wink distribution layout is as follows:
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/wink
- Version (e.g. '0.1-incubating')
o apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip
o apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.zip
o apache-wink-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
o apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip will be in the same layout as https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/wink/wink-dist/0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT/wink-dist-0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.zip
What do you think?
--martin
RE: [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
Posted by "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>.
I will check it
-----Original Message-----
From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 5:33 PM
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
Anyone ran the dists through "Apache RAT"? http://incubator.apache.org/rat/
thanks,
dims
On 07/27/2009 09:56 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Yes, we need to make sure the published zip/tgz + jars have the required
> incubator disclaimers.
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Jul 21, 2009, at 9:05 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
>
>> Makes sense to me... +1
>>
>> I don't know if this is the best place to talk about it, but in going
>> through the Incubator release policy stuff, I noticed that there are a
>> few items like an Incubating Disclaimer
>> (http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#notes-disclaimer)
>> that need to be included. Release Notes would fall under that category
>> as well.
>>
>> -N
>>
>> Nicholas Gallardo
>> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
>> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
>> Phone: 512-286-6258
>> Building: 903 / 5G-016
>> "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>
>>
>>
>> "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>
>> 07/21/2009 08:52 AM
>> Please respond to
>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>
>> To
>>
>> "wink-dev@incubator.apache.org" <wi...@incubator.apache.org>
>>
>> cc
>>
>>
>> Subject
>>
>> [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
>>
>>
>> I would like to discuss Wink distribution layout.
>> The Incubator
>> insists<http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases>
>> that artifacts for {podling} are contained within
>> www.apache.org/dist/incubator/{podling}<http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/%7bpodling%7d>.
>> A podling is free to choose a suitable layout for its released artifacts.
>>
>> My proposal for Wink distribution layout is as follows:
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/wink
>>
>> - Version (e.g. '0.1-incubating')
>>
>> o apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip
>>
>> o apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.zip
>>
>> o apache-wink-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
>>
>> o apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
>>
>> apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip will be in the same layout as
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/wink/wink-dist/0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT/wink-dist-0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.zip
>>
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> --martin
>>
>
>
RE: [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
Posted by "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>.
I will fix Application files and leave javax.ws.rs.ext.RuntimeDelegate as is.
I see that you have some experience with RAT - beside checking the presence of legal headers, what else it does? (could not find any descent documentation)
martin
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Dillon [mailto:jason.dillon@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jason Dillon
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 8:30 PM
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
Application files are internal to Wink or part of the JAX-RS spec? It
looked like they were properties files and can be adorned with a legal
header.
javax.ws.rs.ext.RuntimeDelegate is only to contain a single line of a
class name to load. I am not sure if the spec allows for adorning a
header here.
It would be nice to resolve the application files if we can and then
can leave the javax.ws.rs.ext.RuntimeDelegate asis. Geronimo has a
few of these spec files that contain only classes which we just ignore
when RAT complains.
--jason
On Jul 28, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote:
> I have run Wink sources/binaries dists through "Apache RAT" (see
> attached RAT reports)
> The only problem that I succeeded to identify was missing Apache
> License Headers in javax.ws.rs.ext.RuntimeDelegate & application
> files. But maybe I miss-interpreted the reports.
>
> Sources dist: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT/apache-wink-0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT-src.zip
> Binaries dist: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT/apache-wink-0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.zip
> Latest stable release of RAT: http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/
> rat/
>
> Martin.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Snitkovsky, Martin
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 7:30 AM
> To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
>
> I will check it
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 5:33 PM
> To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
>
> Anyone ran the dists through "Apache RAT"? http://incubator.apache.org/rat/
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On 07/27/2009 09:56 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>> Yes, we need to make sure the published zip/tgz + jars have the
>> required
>> incubator disclaimers.
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Jul 21, 2009, at 9:05 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
>>
>>> Makes sense to me... +1
>>>
>>> I don't know if this is the best place to talk about it, but in
>>> going
>>> through the Incubator release policy stuff, I noticed that there
>>> are a
>>> few items like an Incubating Disclaimer
>>> (http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#notes-disclaimer
>>> )
>>> that need to be included. Release Notes would fall under that
>>> category
>>> as well.
>>>
>>> -N
>>>
>>> Nicholas Gallardo
>>> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
>>> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
>>> Phone: 512-286-6258
>>> Building: 903 / 5G-016
>>> "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>
>>> 07/21/2009 08:52 AM
>>> Please respond to
>>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>> To
>>>
>>> "wink-dev@incubator.apache.org" <wi...@incubator.apache.org>
>>>
>>> cc
>>>
>>>
>>> Subject
>>>
>>> [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
>>>
>>>
>>> I would like to discuss Wink distribution layout.
>>> The Incubator
>>> insists<http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
>>> >
>>> that artifacts for {podling} are contained within
>>> www.apache.org/dist/incubator/{podling}<http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/%7bpodling%7d
>>> >.
>>> A podling is free to choose a suitable layout for its released
>>> artifacts.
>>>
>>> My proposal for Wink distribution layout is as follows:
>>>
>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/wink
>>>
>>> - Version (e.g. '0.1-incubating')
>>>
>>> o apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip
>>>
>>> o apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.zip
>>>
>>> o apache-wink-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
>>>
>>> o apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
>>>
>>> apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip will be in the same layout as
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/wink/wink-dist/0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT/wink-dist-0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.zip
>>>
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> --martin
>>>
>>
>>
> <report_src.xml><report_bin.xml>
Re: [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Application files are internal to Wink or part of the JAX-RS spec? It
looked like they were properties files and can be adorned with a legal
header.
javax.ws.rs.ext.RuntimeDelegate is only to contain a single line of a
class name to load. I am not sure if the spec allows for adorning a
header here.
It would be nice to resolve the application files if we can and then
can leave the javax.ws.rs.ext.RuntimeDelegate asis. Geronimo has a
few of these spec files that contain only classes which we just ignore
when RAT complains.
--jason
On Jul 28, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote:
> I have run Wink sources/binaries dists through "Apache RAT" (see
> attached RAT reports)
> The only problem that I succeeded to identify was missing Apache
> License Headers in javax.ws.rs.ext.RuntimeDelegate & application
> files. But maybe I miss-interpreted the reports.
>
> Sources dist: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT/apache-wink-0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT-src.zip
> Binaries dist: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT/apache-wink-0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.zip
> Latest stable release of RAT: http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/
> rat/
>
> Martin.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Snitkovsky, Martin
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 7:30 AM
> To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
>
> I will check it
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 5:33 PM
> To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
>
> Anyone ran the dists through "Apache RAT"? http://incubator.apache.org/rat/
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On 07/27/2009 09:56 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>> Yes, we need to make sure the published zip/tgz + jars have the
>> required
>> incubator disclaimers.
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Jul 21, 2009, at 9:05 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
>>
>>> Makes sense to me... +1
>>>
>>> I don't know if this is the best place to talk about it, but in
>>> going
>>> through the Incubator release policy stuff, I noticed that there
>>> are a
>>> few items like an Incubating Disclaimer
>>> (http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#notes-disclaimer
>>> )
>>> that need to be included. Release Notes would fall under that
>>> category
>>> as well.
>>>
>>> -N
>>>
>>> Nicholas Gallardo
>>> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
>>> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
>>> Phone: 512-286-6258
>>> Building: 903 / 5G-016
>>> "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>
>>> 07/21/2009 08:52 AM
>>> Please respond to
>>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>> To
>>>
>>> "wink-dev@incubator.apache.org" <wi...@incubator.apache.org>
>>>
>>> cc
>>>
>>>
>>> Subject
>>>
>>> [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
>>>
>>>
>>> I would like to discuss Wink distribution layout.
>>> The Incubator
>>> insists<http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
>>> >
>>> that artifacts for {podling} are contained within
>>> www.apache.org/dist/incubator/{podling}<http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/%7bpodling%7d
>>> >.
>>> A podling is free to choose a suitable layout for its released
>>> artifacts.
>>>
>>> My proposal for Wink distribution layout is as follows:
>>>
>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/wink
>>>
>>> - Version (e.g. '0.1-incubating')
>>>
>>> o apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip
>>>
>>> o apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.zip
>>>
>>> o apache-wink-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
>>>
>>> o apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
>>>
>>> apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip will be in the same layout as
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/wink/wink-dist/0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT/wink-dist-0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.zip
>>>
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> --martin
>>>
>>
>>
> <report_src.xml><report_bin.xml>
Re: [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Application files are internal to Wink or part of the JAX-RS spec? It
looked like they were properties files and can be adorned with a legal
header.
javax.ws.rs.ext.RuntimeDelegate is only to contain a single line of a
class name to load. I am not sure if the spec allows for adorning a
header here.
It would be nice to resolve the application files if we can and then
can leave the javax.ws.rs.ext.RuntimeDelegate asis. Geronimo has a
few of these spec files that contain only classes which we just ignore
when RAT complains.
--jason
On Jul 28, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote:
> I have run Wink sources/binaries dists through "Apache RAT" (see
> attached RAT reports)
> The only problem that I succeeded to identify was missing Apache
> License Headers in javax.ws.rs.ext.RuntimeDelegate & application
> files. But maybe I miss-interpreted the reports.
>
> Sources dist: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT/apache-wink-0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT-src.zip
> Binaries dist: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT/apache-wink-0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.zip
> Latest stable release of RAT: http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/
> rat/
>
> Martin.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Snitkovsky, Martin
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 7:30 AM
> To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
>
> I will check it
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 5:33 PM
> To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
>
> Anyone ran the dists through "Apache RAT"? http://incubator.apache.org/rat/
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On 07/27/2009 09:56 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>> Yes, we need to make sure the published zip/tgz + jars have the
>> required
>> incubator disclaimers.
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Jul 21, 2009, at 9:05 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
>>
>>> Makes sense to me... +1
>>>
>>> I don't know if this is the best place to talk about it, but in
>>> going
>>> through the Incubator release policy stuff, I noticed that there
>>> are a
>>> few items like an Incubating Disclaimer
>>> (http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#notes-disclaimer
>>> )
>>> that need to be included. Release Notes would fall under that
>>> category
>>> as well.
>>>
>>> -N
>>>
>>> Nicholas Gallardo
>>> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
>>> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
>>> Phone: 512-286-6258
>>> Building: 903 / 5G-016
>>> "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>
>>> 07/21/2009 08:52 AM
>>> Please respond to
>>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>> To
>>>
>>> "wink-dev@incubator.apache.org" <wi...@incubator.apache.org>
>>>
>>> cc
>>>
>>>
>>> Subject
>>>
>>> [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
>>>
>>>
>>> I would like to discuss Wink distribution layout.
>>> The Incubator
>>> insists<http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
>>> >
>>> that artifacts for {podling} are contained within
>>> www.apache.org/dist/incubator/{podling}<http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/%7bpodling%7d
>>> >.
>>> A podling is free to choose a suitable layout for its released
>>> artifacts.
>>>
>>> My proposal for Wink distribution layout is as follows:
>>>
>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/wink
>>>
>>> - Version (e.g. '0.1-incubating')
>>>
>>> o apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip
>>>
>>> o apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.zip
>>>
>>> o apache-wink-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
>>>
>>> o apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
>>>
>>> apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip will be in the same layout as
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/wink/wink-dist/0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT/wink-dist-0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.zip
>>>
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> --martin
>>>
>>
>>
> <report_src.xml><report_bin.xml>
RE: [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
Posted by "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>.
I have run Wink sources/binaries dists through "Apache RAT" (see attached RAT reports)
The only problem that I succeeded to identify was missing Apache License Headers in javax.ws.rs.ext.RuntimeDelegate & application files. But maybe I miss-interpreted the reports.
Sources dist: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT/apache-wink-0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT-src.zip
Binaries dist: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT/apache-wink-0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.zip
Latest stable release of RAT: http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/rat/
Martin.
-----Original Message-----
From: Snitkovsky, Martin
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 7:30 AM
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
I will check it
-----Original Message-----
From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 5:33 PM
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
Anyone ran the dists through "Apache RAT"? http://incubator.apache.org/rat/
thanks,
dims
On 07/27/2009 09:56 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Yes, we need to make sure the published zip/tgz + jars have the required
> incubator disclaimers.
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Jul 21, 2009, at 9:05 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
>
>> Makes sense to me... +1
>>
>> I don't know if this is the best place to talk about it, but in going
>> through the Incubator release policy stuff, I noticed that there are a
>> few items like an Incubating Disclaimer
>> (http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#notes-disclaimer)
>> that need to be included. Release Notes would fall under that category
>> as well.
>>
>> -N
>>
>> Nicholas Gallardo
>> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
>> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
>> Phone: 512-286-6258
>> Building: 903 / 5G-016
>> "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>
>>
>>
>> "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>
>> 07/21/2009 08:52 AM
>> Please respond to
>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>
>> To
>>
>> "wink-dev@incubator.apache.org" <wi...@incubator.apache.org>
>>
>> cc
>>
>>
>> Subject
>>
>> [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
>>
>>
>> I would like to discuss Wink distribution layout.
>> The Incubator
>> insists<http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases>
>> that artifacts for {podling} are contained within
>> www.apache.org/dist/incubator/{podling}<http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/%7bpodling%7d>.
>> A podling is free to choose a suitable layout for its released artifacts.
>>
>> My proposal for Wink distribution layout is as follows:
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/wink
>>
>> - Version (e.g. '0.1-incubating')
>>
>> o apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip
>>
>> o apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.zip
>>
>> o apache-wink-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
>>
>> o apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
>>
>> apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip will be in the same layout as
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/wink/wink-dist/0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT/wink-dist-0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.zip
>>
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> --martin
>>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
Anyone ran the dists through "Apache RAT"? http://incubator.apache.org/rat/
thanks,
dims
On 07/27/2009 09:56 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Yes, we need to make sure the published zip/tgz + jars have the required
> incubator disclaimers.
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Jul 21, 2009, at 9:05 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
>
>> Makes sense to me... +1
>>
>> I don't know if this is the best place to talk about it, but in going
>> through the Incubator release policy stuff, I noticed that there are a
>> few items like an Incubating Disclaimer
>> (http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#notes-disclaimer)
>> that need to be included. Release Notes would fall under that category
>> as well.
>>
>> -N
>>
>> Nicholas Gallardo
>> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
>> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
>> Phone: 512-286-6258
>> Building: 903 / 5G-016
>> "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>
>>
>>
>> "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>
>> 07/21/2009 08:52 AM
>> Please respond to
>> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>
>> To
>>
>> "wink-dev@incubator.apache.org" <wi...@incubator.apache.org>
>>
>> cc
>>
>>
>> Subject
>>
>> [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
>>
>>
>> I would like to discuss Wink distribution layout.
>> The Incubator
>> insists<http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases>
>> that artifacts for {podling} are contained within
>> www.apache.org/dist/incubator/{podling}<http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/%7bpodling%7d>.
>> A podling is free to choose a suitable layout for its released artifacts.
>>
>> My proposal for Wink distribution layout is as follows:
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/wink
>>
>> - Version (e.g. '0.1-incubating')
>>
>> o apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip
>>
>> o apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.zip
>>
>> o apache-wink-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
>>
>> o apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
>>
>> apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip will be in the same layout as
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/wink/wink-dist/0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT/wink-dist-0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.zip
>>
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> --martin
>>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Yes, we need to make sure the published zip/tgz + jars have the
required incubator disclaimers.
--jason
On Jul 21, 2009, at 9:05 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
> Makes sense to me... +1
>
> I don't know if this is the best place to talk about it, but in
> going through the Incubator release policy stuff, I noticed that
> there are a few items like an Incubating Disclaimer (http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#notes-disclaimer
> ) that need to be included. Release Notes would fall under that
> category as well.
>
> -N
>
> Nicholas Gallardo
> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
> Phone: 512-286-6258
> Building: 903 / 5G-016
> "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>
>
>
> "Snitkovsky, Martin" <ma...@hp.com>
> 07/21/2009 08:52 AM
> Please respond to
> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
> To
>
> "wink-dev@incubator.apache.org" <wi...@incubator.apache.org>
>
> cc
>
>
> Subject
>
> [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
>
>
> I would like to discuss Wink distribution layout.
> The Incubator insists<http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
> > that artifacts for {podling} are contained within www.apache.org/dist/incubator/
> {podling}<http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/%7bpodling%7d>. A
> podling is free to choose a suitable layout for its released
> artifacts.
>
> My proposal for Wink distribution layout is as follows:
>
> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/wink
>
> - Version (e.g. '0.1-incubating')
>
> o apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip
>
> o apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.zip
>
> o apache-wink-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
>
> o apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
>
> apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip will be in the same layout as https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/wink/wink-dist/0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT/wink-dist-0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.zip
>
> What do you think?
>
> --martin
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
Posted by Nicholas L Gallardo <nl...@us.ibm.com>.
Makes sense to me... +1
I don't know if this is the best place to talk about it, but in going
through the Incubator release policy stuff, I noticed that there are a few
items like an Incubating Disclaimer
(http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#notes-disclaimer)
that need to be included. Release Notes would fall under that category as
well.
-N
Nicholas Gallardo
WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
nlgallar@us.ibm.com
Phone: 512-286-6258
Building: 903 / 5G-016
"Snitkovsky,
Martin"
<martin.snitkovsk To
y@hp.com> "wink-dev@incubator.apache.org"
<wi...@incubator.apache.org>
07/21/2009 08:52 cc
AM
Subject
[DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
Please respond to
wink-dev@incubato
r.apache.org
I would like to discuss Wink distribution layout.
The Incubator insists<
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases>
that artifacts for {podling} are contained within
www.apache.org/dist/incubator/{podling}<
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/%7bpodling%7d>. A podling is free to
choose a suitable layout for its released artifacts.
My proposal for Wink distribution layout is as follows:
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/wink
- Version (e.g. '0.1-incubating')
o apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip
o apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.zip
o apache-wink-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
o apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip will be in the same layout as
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/wink/wink-dist/0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT/wink-dist-0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.zip
What do you think?
--martin