You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Da...@ChaosReigns.com on 2010/02/28 19:13:46 UTC
Rule QA: Completeness / Preflight?
I believe I checked "916929: 2010-02-27 08:50:01" twice today, and got
different numbers each time. Is that because it wasn't complete? Is there
a way to tell if it's complete?
Also, Is there no preflight check data, only nightlies and weekly
network checks?
I'm probably going to end up graphing the stats for the DNSWL tests from
the weekly network mass-checks from when they started in December 2006, so
if there's better data (preflight / sa-update) I'd like to know about it.
I noticed the statistics files that come with SA releases are only
updated every major release.
I'll be sure to hit non-detail URLs.
--
"Blades don't need reloading." - The Zombie Survival Guide by Max Brooks
http://www.ChaosReigns.com
Re: Rule QA: Completeness / Preflight?
Posted by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>.
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 17:09, <Da...@chaosreigns.com> wrote:
> On 03/01, Justin Mason wrote:
>> that's the ruleqa.spamassassin.org UI.
>
> Which data is used for the sa-updates? Just the latest random weekly
> network mass-check?
Yep, exactly. (with additional checks to ensure the data is "good enough"
beforehand.)
--
--j.
Re: Rule QA: Completeness / Preflight?
Posted by Da...@ChaosReigns.com.
On 03/01, Justin Mason wrote:
> that's the ruleqa.spamassassin.org UI.
Which data is used for the sa-updates? Just the latest random weekly
network mass-check?
--
"Life is but a walking shadow, a poor player that struts and frets his
hour upon the stage--and then is heard no more. It is a tale told by an
idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing." - William Shakespeare
http://www.ChaosReigns.com
Re: Rule QA: Completeness / Preflight?
Posted by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>.
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 15:01, <Da...@chaosreigns.com> wrote:
> On 03/01, Justin Mason wrote:
>> it's based on who's reported their logs -- give it time to complete.
>
> Thanks.
>
>> nope -- preflights have been stopped, as they're quite CPU-intensive and
>> we don't have the hardware.
>
> How about hit-frequencies output from the corpora used for sa-update
> updates?
that's the ruleqa.spamassassin.org UI.
Re: Rule QA: Completeness / Preflight?
Posted by Da...@ChaosReigns.com.
On 03/01, Justin Mason wrote:
> it's based on who's reported their logs -- give it time to complete.
Thanks.
> nope -- preflights have been stopped, as they're quite CPU-intensive and
> we don't have the hardware.
How about hit-frequencies output from the corpora used for sa-update
updates?
--
"Dance, dance, wherever you may be" - Lord of the Dance
http://www.ChaosReigns.com
Re: Rule QA: Completeness / Preflight?
Posted by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>.
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 18:13, <Da...@chaosreigns.com> wrote:
> I believe I checked "916929: 2010-02-27 08:50:01" twice today, and got
> different numbers each time. Is that because it wasn't complete? Is there
> a way to tell if it's complete?
it's based on who's reported their logs -- give it time to complete.
> Also, Is there no preflight check data, only nightlies and weekly
> network checks?
nope -- preflights have been stopped, as they're quite CPU-intensive and
we don't have the hardware.
--j.
> I'm probably going to end up graphing the stats for the DNSWL tests from
> the weekly network mass-checks from when they started in December 2006, so
> if there's better data (preflight / sa-update) I'd like to know about it.
> I noticed the statistics files that come with SA releases are only
> updated every major release.
>
> I'll be sure to hit non-detail URLs.
>
> --
> "Blades don't need reloading." - The Zombie Survival Guide by Max Brooks
> http://www.ChaosReigns.com
>
>
--
--j.