You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@maven.apache.org by Mick Knutson <mi...@gmail.com> on 2008/04/16 05:59:20 UTC
Re: [m2] cobertura code coverage for dbunit test classes with testNG and OpenJPA?
I am still having an issue with this...
Can someone please help me track down the issue here? I do not get any
errors, but I just get no test coverage (everything is at zero).
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Mick Knutson <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So I am still having this intermittant issue.
> I looked at http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/usage.html and
> have a small question about the
>
> <goal>clean</goal>
>
> So does this mean that cobertura instruments the code during the clean?
>
> I am suspecting that there is an issue with my openJPA plugin trying to
> run some instrumentation (or something) on my code. Is this conflicting with
> Cobertura?
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Mick Knutson <mi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > So I need to mention again, I am using the openJPA plugin to enhance the
> > byte code in this project.
> >
> > But it seems strange. I uncommented <goal>check</goal> then got an error
> > as I am under 25% coverage (as expected), then commented it out again so the
> > site:site would complete. Then BAM! I got my coverage report.
> >
> > Then I ran another clean install, and the report stopped again. So I
> > uncommented <goal>check</goal>, ran the build again that failed, commented
> > <goal>check</goal> again, and BAM it worked again.
> >
> > I am not fully sure whate the trick is, but it seems I need to not clean
> > the build, and run the plugin with <goal>check</goal> in order to make this
> > work.
> >
> > Has anyone run into this as well?
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 4:20 AM, Erez Nahir <er...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Mick,
> > >
> > > We have surefire 2.4.2 + testng + cobertura 2.2 works.
> > > Your cofiguration looks fine to me, but, I'm missing the cobertura
> > > definition in the <reporting> section.
> > > The only difference I see from out build (other then the need to add
> > > cobertuar to reporting section) is usage of ${basedir} as value. Try
> > > to
> > > remove it, I know surefire has some issues passing values of
> > > ${properties}.
> > >
> > > Here is what we have:
> > > In surefire plugin:
> > > <property>
> > > <name>net.sourceforge.cobertura.datafile</name>
> > > <value>target/cobertura/cobertura.ser</value>
> > > </property>
> > > </systemProperties>
> > > In the reporting section:
> > > <reporting>
> > > <plugins>
> > > ...
> > > ...
> > > <plugin>
> > > <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>cobertura-maven-plugin</artifactId>
> > > <version>2.2</version>
> > > </plugin>
> > > </plugins>
> > > </reporting>
> > > HTH,
> > > Erez.
> > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Mick Knutson <mi...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Anyone have any ideas?
> > > > I have tried cobertura 2.0 and 2.2 maven plugin and still the same
> > > result.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Mick Knutson <mickknutson@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I have a Spring, OpenJPA, DBUnit, TestNG, HSQL build with Maven
> > > 2.0.8and
> > > > > there are 20 DAO tests that now pass. I am trying to now add
> > > cobertura
> > > > to
> > > > > this. I have used Cobertura extensively in the past, but never
> > > with
> > > > DBUnit.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, I am getting the report to generate, but everything is zero.
> > > So it
> > > > > appears that nothing was instrumented.
> > > > > Here is my surefire and cobertura plugins:
> > > > >
> > > > > <reporting>....
> > > > > <plugin>
> > > > >
> > > <artifactId>maven-surefire-report-plugin</artifactId>
> > > > > <version>2.4.2</version>
> > > > > <configuration>
> > > > > <includes>
> > > > > <include implementation="java.lang.String
> > > > > ">**/*.java</include>
> > > > > </includes>
> > > > > <excludes>
> > > > > <exclude implementation="java.lang.String
> > > > > ">**/*Point*.java</exclude>
> > > > > </excludes>
> > > > > <systemProperties>
> > > > > <property>
> > > > >
> > > <name>net.sourceforge.cobertura.datafile
> > > > > </name>
> > > > >
> > > > > <value>${basedir}/target/cobertura/cobertura.ser</value>
> > > > > </property>
> > > > > </systemProperties>
> > > > > <argLine>-Xmx256m</argLine>
> > > > > <testFailureIgnore>true</testFailureIgnore>
> > > > > </configuration>
> > > > > </plugin>
> > > > >
> > > > > <plugins>...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > <plugin>
> > > > > <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
> > > > > <artifactId>dbunit-maven-plugin</artifactId>
> > > > > <version>1.0-beta-1</version>
> > > > > <configuration>
> > > > >
> > > <dataTypeFactoryName>${dbunit.dataTypeFactoryName
> > > > > }</dataTypeFactoryName>
> > > > > <driver>${jdbc.driverClassName}</driver>
> > > > > <username>${jdbc.username}</username>
> > > > > <password>${jdbc.password}</password>
> > > > > <url>${jdbc.url}</url>
> > > > > <src>src/test/resources/test-data.xml</src>
> > > > > <type>${dbunit.operation.type}</type>
> > > > > <schema>${dbunit.schema}</schema>
> > > > > <skip>${maven.test.skip}</skip>
> > > > > </configuration>
> > > > > <executions>
> > > > > <execution>
> > > > > <phase>test-compile</phase>
> > > > > <goals>
> > > > > <goal>operation</goal>
> > > > > </goals>
> > > > > </execution>
> > > > > </executions>
> > > > > <dependencies>
> > > > > <dependency>
> > > > > <groupId>${jdbc.groupId}</groupId>
> > > > >
> > > <artifactId>${jdbc.artifactId}</artifactId>
> > > > > <version>${jdbc.version}</version>
> > > > > </dependency>
> > > > > </dependencies>
> > > > > </plugin>
> > > > > <plugin>
> > > > > <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
> > > > > <artifactId>cobertura-maven-plugin</artifactId>
> > > > > <version>2.2</version>
> > > > >
> > > > > <configuration>
> > > > > <formats>
> > > > > <format>xml</format>
> > > > > <format>html</format>
> > > > > </formats>
> > > > >
> > > > > <instrumentation>
> > > > > <ignores>
> > > > > <ignore>org.apache.commons.logging.*
> > > > </ignore>
> > > > > </ignores>
> > > > > <excludes>
> > > > > <exclude>com/**/*Test.class</exclude>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > <exclude>org/apache/log4j/**/*.class</exclude>
> > > > >
> > > > > </excludes>
> > > > > </instrumentation>
> > > > > </configuration>
> > > > > <executions>
> > > > > <execution>
> > > > > <goals>
> > > > > <goal>clean</goal>
> > > > > </goals>
> > > > > </execution>
> > > > > </executions>
> > > > > </plugin>
> > > > >
> > > > > <plugin>
> > > > > <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
> > > > > <artifactId>openjpa-maven-plugin</artifactId>
> > > > > <executions>
> > > > > <execution>
> > > > > <id>JPA Enhance</id>
> > > > > <phase>process-classes</phase>
> > > > > <goals>
> > > > > <goal>enhance</goal>
> > > > > </goals>
> > > > > </execution>
> > > > > </executions>
> > > > > <configuration>
> > > > > <toolProperties>
> > > > > <property>
> > > > > <name>addDefaultConstructor</name>
> > > > > <value>true</value>
> > > > > </property>
> > > > > <property>
> > > > >
> > > <name>enforcePropertyRestrictions</name>
> > > > > <value>true</value>
> > > > > </property>
> > > > > </toolProperties>
> > > > > </configuration>
> > > > > </plugin>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > When I run mvn site:site to a txt file, I started looking through
> > > the
> > > > > trace and noticed:
> > > > >
> > > > > *[INFO] [cobertura:instrument]
> > > > > [INFO] Cobertura 1.9 - GNU GPL License (NO WARRANTY) - See
> > > COPYRIGHT
> > > > file
> > > > > Cobertura: Loaded information on 13 classes.
> > > > > Instrumenting 13 files to
> > > > > C:\opt\temp\myproject\core\target\generated-classes\cobertura
> > > > > Cobertura: Saved information on 13 classes.
> > > > > Instrument time: 266ms
> > > > >
> > > > > [INFO] Instrumentation was successful.
> > > > > *
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > So am I missing something with DBUnit plugin, or openJPA plugin as
> > > to
> > > > > point to *target\generated-classes\cobertura instead of
> > > **target\classes
> > > > > ???
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > *--
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Mick Knutson
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.baselogic.com
> > > > > http://www.blincmagazine.com
> > > > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/mickknutson
> > > > > http://www.djmick.com
> > > > > http://www.myspace.com/mickknutson
> > > > > http://www.myspace.com/BLiNCMagazine
> > > > > http://tahoe.baselogic.com
> > > > > ---
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Mick Knutson
> > > >
> > > > http://www.baselogic.com
> > > > http://www.blincmagazine.com
> > > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/mickknutson
> > > > http://www.djmick.com
> > > > http://www.myspace.com/mickknutson
> > > > http://www.myspace.com/BLiNCMagazine
> > > > http://tahoe.baselogic.com
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Mick Knutson
> >
> > http://www.baselogic.com
> > http://www.blincmagazine.com
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/mickknutson
> > http://www.djmick.com
> > http://www.myspace.com/mickknutson
> > http://www.myspace.com/BLiNCMagazine
> > http://tahoe.baselogic.com
> > ---
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Mick Knutson
>
> http://www.baselogic.com
> http://www.blincmagazine.com
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/mickknutson
> http://www.djmick.com
> http://www.myspace.com/mickknutson
> http://www.myspace.com/BLiNCMagazine
> http://tahoe.baselogic.com
> ---
>
--
Thanks,
Mick Knutson
http://www.baselogic.com
http://www.blincmagazine.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/mickknutson
http://www.djmick.com
http://www.myspace.com/mickknutson
http://www.myspace.com/BLiNCMagazine
http://tahoe.baselogic.com
---