You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cloudstack.apache.org by "IgaoWolf (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/11/10 15:04:29 UTC
[I] Doubt - Assigning resource pools in different VPC offerings. [cloudstack]
IgaoWolf opened a new issue, #8219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8219
Hello community, how are you?
I have a project that I would like to implement, but I am having trouble designing it within CloudStack. I imagine there are ways to work around this situation, so let's get straight to the point:
I created 3 different offerings for VPC, in which I would like to limit the site-to-site VPNs to a significant quantity among them. For example, VPC 1 - enabled for 2 site-to-site VPNs, and the others would have different limited quantities.
<img width="451" alt="Screenshot 2023-11-10 at 11 51 25" src="https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/assets/81160709/af4ad379-6071-4c3b-b207-6d2614e18dbf">
So, I would like to check if it is possible to not use the global settings for this format.
Site2site.vpn.vpngateway.connection.limit
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Doubt - Assigning resource pools in different VPC offerings. [cloudstack]
Posted by "DaanHoogland (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
DaanHoogland commented on issue #8219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8219#issuecomment-1805955182
@IgaoWolf , the config key `site2site.vpn.vpngateway.connection.limit` is now only global. It would have to be overridable in one of the details tables and the usage of it (in the code) would have to take that into account.
This sounds like an improvement request.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Doubt - Assigning resource pools in different VPC offerings. [cloudstack]
Posted by "weizhouapache (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
weizhouapache commented on issue #8219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8219#issuecomment-2085591911
> No @rohityadavcloud , I would say this is a design discussion cc @weizhouapache
agree @DaanHoogland
looks like a new feature request - VPC settings
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Doubt - Assigning resource pools in different VPC offerings. [cloudstack]
Posted by "rohityadavcloud (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
rohityadavcloud commented on issue #8219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8219#issuecomment-2085213758
Is this resolved, can we close the ticket?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Doubt - Assigning resource pools in different VPC offerings. [cloudstack]
Posted by "DaanHoogland (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
DaanHoogland commented on issue #8219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8219#issuecomment-1812674921
> @IgaoWolf @DaanHoogland PR #6918 adds the support for network-scope settings. After it gets merged, we could also consider adding VPC-scope settings to allow overriding settings such as `site2site.vpn.vpngateway.connection.limit`, `site2site.vpn.service.provider.exclude` and `site2site.vpn.customergateway.subnets.limit`.
@winterhazel I would agree, but #6918 is not getting much attention at the moment.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Doubt - Assigning resource pools in different VPC offerings. [cloudstack]
Posted by "phsm (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
phsm commented on issue #8219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8219#issuecomment-5268476244
We have decided in the past to not use this feature, so we can't dedicate time to develop it.
Perhaps someone can adopt it and port to the current codebase.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Doubt - Assigning resource pools in different VPC offerings. [cloudstack]
Posted by "nvazquez (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
nvazquez commented on issue #8219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8219#issuecomment-5268600157
Thanks for the update @phsm! Will check the current state of the PR and try porting it to the main branch
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Doubt - Assigning resource pools in different VPC offerings. [cloudstack]
Posted by "winterhazel (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
winterhazel commented on issue #8219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8219#issuecomment-1808616601
@IgaoWolf @DaanHoogland PR #6918 adds the support for network-scope settings. After it gets merged, we could also consider adding VPC-scope settings to allow overriding settings such as `site2site.vpn.vpngateway.connection.limit`, `site2site.vpn.service.provider.exclude` and `site2site.vpn.customergateway.subnets.limit`.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Doubt - Assigning resource pools in different VPC offerings. [cloudstack]
Posted by "nvazquez (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
nvazquez commented on issue #8219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8219#issuecomment-5266628386
Hi @soreana I have checked the PR https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/6918 was closed and may need to be reopened by some ex colleagues from your former company. @benj-n @phsm any updates on the submission of this PR?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Doubt - Assigning resource pools in different VPC offerings. [cloudstack]
Posted by "soreana (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
soreana commented on issue #8219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8219#issuecomment-2087683806
> > @IgaoWolf @DaanHoogland PR #6918 adds the support for network-scope settings. After it gets merged, we could also consider adding VPC-scope settings to allow overriding settings such as `site2site.vpn.vpngateway.connection.limit`, `site2site.vpn.service.provider.exclude` and `site2site.vpn.customergateway.subnets.limit`.
>
> As I remember, the leaseweb fork has vpc-scope settings, right? @soreana
Hey @weizhouapache,
Sorry for the delayed response. As far as I can remember, the Leaseweb fork has network scope settings. I have already created a pull request for it in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/6918, which is still pending. I'm not sure about the current status of the pull request since I have left the company and no longer have access to the Leaseweb repo.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Doubt - Assigning resource pools in different VPC offerings. [cloudstack]
Posted by "DaanHoogland (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
DaanHoogland commented on issue #8219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8219#issuecomment-2085489218
No @rohityadavcloud , I would say this is a design discussion cc @weizhouapache
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Doubt - Assigning resource pools in different VPC offerings. [cloudstack]
Posted by "weizhouapache (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
weizhouapache commented on issue #8219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8219#issuecomment-1812988675
> @IgaoWolf @DaanHoogland PR #6918 adds the support for network-scope settings. After it gets merged, we could also consider adding VPC-scope settings to allow overriding settings such as `site2site.vpn.vpngateway.connection.limit`, `site2site.vpn.service.provider.exclude` and `site2site.vpn.customergateway.subnets.limit`.
As I remember, the leaseweb fork has vpc-scope settings, right? @soreana
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Doubt - Assigning resource pools in different VPC offerings. [cloudstack]
Posted by "IgaoWolf (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
IgaoWolf commented on issue #8219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8219#issuecomment-1806072424
@DaanHoogland I also find this interesting; I think it's a good implementation for the community. It will provide more freedom to create different types of offerings or "plans" and also the ability to serve different types of users/clients. It opens up a significant advantage for those who can build an architecture around different VPC plans, separating them into tiers and adding a differential value.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org