You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to ivy-user@ant.apache.org by Anders Søe <an...@soee.org> on 2009/01/23 17:27:51 UTC
New feature request : RetrieveReport
Just like the resolve process returns a ResolveReport, i would be nice
if the retrieve process returned a RetrieveReport with details about the
actual retrieved artifacts and their locations.
This would make it possible for 3rd party applications, like IDE addons,
to work with the retrieved files.
Furthermore it would be possible to expand the Ant tasks with a
"retrievePath" target, just like the current "cachePath", but with the
retrieved locations. I have seen several questions on the mailing list
recently related to this.
- Anders Soee
Re: AW: New feature request : RetrieveReport
Posted by Maarten Coene <ma...@yahoo.com>.
Seems a good idea to me. Please create the JIRA ticket.
If someone has some more relevant input, it can be added directly in there..
Maarten
----- Original Message ----
From: Anders Søe <an...@soee.org>
To: ivy-user@ant.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 10:03:01 AM
Subject: Re: AW: New feature request : RetrieveReport
Well, lets call it a "Feature suggestion", and a request for comments then.
Maybe someone else had some relevant input before i post a Jira on it.
/Anders
Jan.Materne@rzf.fin-nrw.de wrote:
> Best place for a feature request is the Jira I think.
>
> Jan
>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Anders Søe [mailto:anders@soee.org] Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Januar 2009 17:28
>> An: ivy-user@ant.apache.org
>> Betreff: New feature request : RetrieveReport
>>
>> Just like the resolve process returns a ResolveReport, i would be nice if the retrieve process returned a RetrieveReport with details about the actual retrieved artifacts and their locations.
>>
>> This would make it possible for 3rd party applications, like IDE addons, to work with the retrieved files.
>>
>> Furthermore it would be possible to expand the Ant tasks with a "retrievePath" target, just like the current "cachePath", but with the retrieved locations. I have seen several questions on the mailing list recently related to this.
>>
>> - Anders Soee
>>
>>
>>
Re: AW: New feature request : RetrieveReport
Posted by Anders Søe <an...@soee.org>.
Well, lets call it a "Feature suggestion", and a request for comments then.
Maybe someone else had some relevant input before i post a Jira on it.
/Anders
Jan.Materne@rzf.fin-nrw.de wrote:
> Best place for a feature request is the Jira I think.
>
> Jan
>
>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Anders Søe [mailto:anders@soee.org]
>> Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Januar 2009 17:28
>> An: ivy-user@ant.apache.org
>> Betreff: New feature request : RetrieveReport
>>
>> Just like the resolve process returns a ResolveReport, i would be nice
>> if the retrieve process returned a RetrieveReport with details
>> about the
>> actual retrieved artifacts and their locations.
>>
>> This would make it possible for 3rd party applications, like
>> IDE addons,
>> to work with the retrieved files.
>>
>> Furthermore it would be possible to expand the Ant tasks with a
>> "retrievePath" target, just like the current "cachePath", but with the
>> retrieved locations. I have seen several questions on the mailing list
>> recently related to this.
>>
>> - Anders Soee
>>
>>
>>
AW: New feature request : RetrieveReport
Posted by Ja...@rzf.fin-nrw.de.
Best place for a feature request is the Jira I think.
Jan
>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: Anders Søe [mailto:anders@soee.org]
>Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Januar 2009 17:28
>An: ivy-user@ant.apache.org
>Betreff: New feature request : RetrieveReport
>
>Just like the resolve process returns a ResolveReport, i would be nice
>if the retrieve process returned a RetrieveReport with details
>about the
>actual retrieved artifacts and their locations.
>
>This would make it possible for 3rd party applications, like
>IDE addons,
>to work with the retrieved files.
>
>Furthermore it would be possible to expand the Ant tasks with a
>"retrievePath" target, just like the current "cachePath", but with the
>retrieved locations. I have seen several questions on the mailing list
>recently related to this.
>
>- Anders Soee
>
>