You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Ben Collins-Sussman <su...@collab.net> on 2003/12/10 17:15:14 UTC
Re: stabilize means STABILIZE (was: svn commit: rev 7961
- trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc)
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 10:16, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> Exactly my understanding of the situation. No, there was no *need* to have
> it in Subversion 1.0. On the other hand do I feel that we can save a lot of
> time spent on support and make a generally good impression if the program look
> good. That is what I'm trying to go for.
I just wanted to say how happy I am with all the commits coming from
Julian and Erik, in general. You guys have become the supreme "code
scrubbers", cleaning up stuff left and right. It's really great!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: stabilize means STABILIZE (was: svn commit: rev 7961 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc)
Posted by Julian Foad <ju...@btopenworld.com>.
Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>
> I just wanted to say how happy I am with all the commits coming from
> Julian and Erik, in general. You guys have become the supreme "code
> scrubbers", cleaning up stuff left and right. It's really great!
Thanks, everyone, for comments like this and for keeping up such a high standard of coding which makes it a pleasure to work with you all.
- Julian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: stabilize means STABILIZE (was: svn commit: rev 7961 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc)
Posted by John Szakmeister <jo...@szakmeister.net>.
On Wednesday 10 December 2003 12:15, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 10:16, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> > Exactly my understanding of the situation. No, there was no *need* to
> > have it in Subversion 1.0. On the other hand do I feel that we can save a
> > lot of time spent on support and make a generally good impression if the
> > program look good. That is what I'm trying to go for.
>
> I just wanted to say how happy I am with all the commits coming from
> Julian and Erik, in general. You guys have become the supreme "code
> scrubbers", cleaning up stuff left and right. It's really great!
I agree. I wish I could've contributed half as much as Julian.
-John
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: stabilize means STABILIZE (was: svn commit: rev 7961 -
trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc)
Posted by Philip Martin <ph...@codematters.co.uk>.
Ben Collins-Sussman <su...@collab.net> writes:
> I just wanted to say how happy I am with all the commits coming from
> Julian and Erik, in general. You guys have become the supreme "code
> scrubbers", cleaning up stuff left and right. It's really great!
I agree. I objected to this particular change, but I have no problem
with the cleanups in general.
--
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org