You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jira@kafka.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/05/23 03:50:58 UTC

[GitHub] [kafka] jsancio commented on a change in pull request #10593: KAFKA-10800 Validate the snapshot id when the state machine creates a snapshot

jsancio commented on a change in pull request #10593:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10593#discussion_r637470950



##########
File path: raft/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/raft/KafkaRaftClient.java
##########
@@ -2268,6 +2269,25 @@ private Long append(int epoch, List<T> records, boolean isAtomic) {
         );
     }
 
+    private void validateSnapshotId(OffsetAndEpoch snapshotId) {
+        Optional<LogOffsetMetadata> highWatermarkOpt = quorum().highWatermark();
+        if (!highWatermarkOpt.isPresent() || highWatermarkOpt.get().offset < snapshotId.offset) {
+            throw new KafkaException("Trying to creating snapshot with invalid snapshotId: " + snapshotId + " whose offset is larger than the high-watermark: " +
+                    highWatermarkOpt + ". This may necessarily mean a bug in the caller, since the there should be a minimum " +
+                    "size of records between the latest snapshot and the high-watermark when creating snapshot");

Review comment:
       I see. I would remove that last sentence because I don\t think this check enforces that and I don't think that it should.

##########
File path: raft/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/raft/RaftClientTestContext.java
##########
@@ -108,6 +108,17 @@
 
     private final List<RaftResponse.Outbound> sentResponses = new ArrayList<>();
 
+    public static void advanceHighWatermark(RaftClientTestContext context,

Review comment:
       How about making it a object/instance method by removing the static keyword so that the user can use it as follow:
   ```
   context.advanceLeaderHighWatermarkToEndOffset()
   ```
   Note that I renamed the method to include leader and removed all of the parameters. I could be wrong but `RaftClientTestContext` should have all of the information it needs to implement this. Also note, that if you want to generalize this then majority of the nodes need to send a `FETCH` request to the leader for the leader to advance the high-watermark.

##########
File path: raft/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/snapshot/SnapshotWriterReaderTest.java
##########
@@ -135,4 +141,18 @@ public static void assertSnapshot(List<List<String>> batches, SnapshotReader<Str
 
         assertEquals(expected, actual);
     }
+
+    private RaftClientTestContext initContextAsLeaderAndAdvanceHighWatermark(OffsetAndEpoch snapshotId) throws Exception {

Review comment:
       Okay but note that if the quorum is a single node quorum then the high-watermark should advance simply by `context.client.poll()`. You can simplify this if you want by making the quorum a single member quorum. See the test in `KafkaRaftClientTest.testLeaderAppendSingleMemberQuorum()`.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org