You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Henri Yandell <ba...@generationjava.com> on 2002/11/22 21:19:53 UTC
[lang] Release 1.0.1 Was: [Lang] proposed maintenance release 1.0.1
I agree[cf below list]. All four are now in the LANG_1_0_BRANCH. I was
able to deal with them by copying the HEAD files over.
This took two extra buggettes:
1) Enum.java was 1.3 dependant [EMPTY_MAP]. This is dealt with.
2) ExceptionUtils now uses SystemUtils to get a property.
There was one other thing I had trouble building under 1.2, the
ToStringStyle class. Has anyone had a chance to look at this and check if
they can build under 1.2?
There is one other serious bug in Bugzilla,
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14062
in which the StringUtils.split method has trouble when the separator is
'null' and the max is less than the actual token count.
I'll work with HEAD atm to see if I can integrate Mark McDowell's
demonstration into the Unit Test to get good proof, then look at his
solution.
Hen
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Sean C. Sullivan wrote:
>
> These are minimum fixes that I see as required for
> a Commons Lang 1.0.1 maintenance release:
>
> 1) NestableException/Delegate is not serializable
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14334
>
> 2) NumberRange.getMaximum returns minimum
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14566
>
> 3) Enum constructor validations
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13568
>
> 4) ExceptionUtils cannot handle J2EE-Exception in a default way
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13527
>
> -Sean
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Henri Yandell"
>
>
>
> Okay, with the Range code suggestions today and Robert getting into
> MethodUtils I think there's still a lot of good development work ongoing
> and that a 1.0.1 should be done.
>
> This would include the following bugfixes:
>
> 14566 - NumberRange.getMaximum
> 13527 - ExceptionUtils lacks common J2EE method names
>
> I don't think the other fixes are major enough to be splicing by hand.
>
> Does anyone care to volunteer? Else I'll just go ahead and follow Steve's
> instructions on this and get it happy.
>
> Hen
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: [lang] Release 1.0.1 Was: [Lang] proposed maintenance release
1.0.1
Posted by Henri Yandell <ba...@generationjava.com>.
C'mon Jeff, find the cvs commit where I made the real joke :)
**************
Put Stephen's privates back. He hadn't needed to take them out.
[Okay, the humour is killing me].
Added this.'s in front of the methods in each constructor.-
**************
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Jeff Varszegi wrote:
> If you need someone to handle problems with your naughty bits, bayard's clearly your man.
> Stephen pulls out your privates, he puts 'em back in. :O)
>
> --- Henri Yandell <ba...@generationjava.com> wrote:
> >
> > Okay. THe actual problem was solved by putting 'this.' in front of the
> > bits. Swore I tried that before, but seems not.
> >
> > I put the privates back in.
> >
> > Protected the NumberUtils test failure from JDK 1.2. And discovered a
> > SystemUtils bug in the process :) Wonder if we can get PMD to complain of
> > instance methods on Utils classes....
> >
> > Anyways, still that split method one to go.
> >
> > Hen
> >
> > On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Henri Yandell wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I will endeavour to test the current branch in a 1.2 compile [it will
> > > fail], then I'll try with your fix to see if that works. If so I'll roll
> > > it in and it'll be in the 1.0.1RC1
> > >
> > > [unless anyone else leaps in and does it]
> > >
> > > Hen
> > >
> > > On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: "Henri Yandell" <ba...@generationjava.com>
> > > > > There was one other thing I had trouble building under 1.2, the
> > > > > ToStringStyle class. Has anyone had a chance to look at this and check if
> > > > > they can build under 1.2?
> > > >
> > > > I've made the inner classes package scoped. This might fix it (I don't have
> > > > a JDK 1.2 to hand)
> > > >
> > > > Stephen
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus � Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> http://mailplus.yahoo.com
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: [lang] Release 1.0.1 Was: [Lang] proposed maintenance release 1.0.1
Posted by Jeff Varszegi <jv...@yahoo.com>.
If you need someone to handle problems with your naughty bits, bayard's clearly your man.
Stephen pulls out your privates, he puts 'em back in. :O)
--- Henri Yandell <ba...@generationjava.com> wrote:
>
> Okay. THe actual problem was solved by putting 'this.' in front of the
> bits. Swore I tried that before, but seems not.
>
> I put the privates back in.
>
> Protected the NumberUtils test failure from JDK 1.2. And discovered a
> SystemUtils bug in the process :) Wonder if we can get PMD to complain of
> instance methods on Utils classes....
>
> Anyways, still that split method one to go.
>
> Hen
>
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> >
> > I will endeavour to test the current branch in a 1.2 compile [it will
> > fail], then I'll try with your fix to see if that works. If so I'll roll
> > it in and it'll be in the 1.0.1RC1
> >
> > [unless anyone else leaps in and does it]
> >
> > Hen
> >
> > On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> >
> > > From: "Henri Yandell" <ba...@generationjava.com>
> > > > There was one other thing I had trouble building under 1.2, the
> > > > ToStringStyle class. Has anyone had a chance to look at this and check if
> > > > they can build under 1.2?
> > >
> > > I've made the inner classes package scoped. This might fix it (I don't have
> > > a JDK 1.2 to hand)
> > >
> > > Stephen
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus � Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: [lang] Release 1.0.1 Was: [Lang] proposed maintenance release
1.0.1
Posted by Henri Yandell <ba...@generationjava.com>.
Okay. THe actual problem was solved by putting 'this.' in front of the
bits. Swore I tried that before, but seems not.
I put the privates back in.
Protected the NumberUtils test failure from JDK 1.2. And discovered a
SystemUtils bug in the process :) Wonder if we can get PMD to complain of
instance methods on Utils classes....
Anyways, still that split method one to go.
Hen
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> I will endeavour to test the current branch in a 1.2 compile [it will
> fail], then I'll try with your fix to see if that works. If so I'll roll
> it in and it'll be in the 1.0.1RC1
>
> [unless anyone else leaps in and does it]
>
> Hen
>
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>
> > From: "Henri Yandell" <ba...@generationjava.com>
> > > There was one other thing I had trouble building under 1.2, the
> > > ToStringStyle class. Has anyone had a chance to look at this and check if
> > > they can build under 1.2?
> >
> > I've made the inner classes package scoped. This might fix it (I don't have
> > a JDK 1.2 to hand)
> >
> > Stephen
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: [lang] Release 1.0.1 Was: [Lang] proposed maintenance release
1.0.1
Posted by Henri Yandell <ba...@generationjava.com>.
I will endeavour to test the current branch in a 1.2 compile [it will
fail], then I'll try with your fix to see if that works. If so I'll roll
it in and it'll be in the 1.0.1RC1
[unless anyone else leaps in and does it]
Hen
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> From: "Henri Yandell" <ba...@generationjava.com>
> > There was one other thing I had trouble building under 1.2, the
> > ToStringStyle class. Has anyone had a chance to look at this and check if
> > they can build under 1.2?
>
> I've made the inner classes package scoped. This might fix it (I don't have
> a JDK 1.2 to hand)
>
> Stephen
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: [lang] Release 1.0.1 Was: [Lang] proposed maintenance release 1.0.1
Posted by Stephen Colebourne <sc...@btopenworld.com>.
From: "Henri Yandell" <ba...@generationjava.com>
> There was one other thing I had trouble building under 1.2, the
> ToStringStyle class. Has anyone had a chance to look at this and check if
> they can build under 1.2?
I've made the inner classes package scoped. This might fix it (I don't have
a JDK 1.2 to hand)
Stephen
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>