You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Sergey Shelukhin (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/02/24 02:58:12 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7920) Move isFamilyEssential(byte[] name) out of Filter interface in 0.94

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13585251#comment-13585251 ] 

Sergey Shelukhin commented on HBASE-7920:
-----------------------------------------

Is it possible to hide the type check somehow? Maybe a static isFamilyEssential method on FilterBase.
Otherwise looks reasonable.
                
> Move isFamilyEssential(byte[] name) out of Filter interface in 0.94
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-7920
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7920
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.5
>            Reporter: Ted Yu
>            Assignee: Ted Yu
>             Fix For: 0.94.6
>
>         Attachments: 7920-94.txt
>
>
> As Dave Latham pointed out here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5416?focusedCommentId=13584553&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13584553
> The addition of isFamilyEssential(byte[] name) in Filter interface in 0.94.5 broke backward compatibility.
> Agreement in subsequent discussions on HBASE-5416 was reached: isFamilyEssential(byte[] name) should be lifted from Filter interface into FilterBase class.
> This would allow 0.94.6 to be compatible with 0.94.1 to 0.94.4 releases.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira