You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@felix.apache.org by sr...@apache.org on 2009/10/01 00:26:19 UTC
svn commit: r820480 - /felix/trunk/http/pom.xml
Author: srs
Date: Wed Sep 30 22:26:18 2009
New Revision: 820480
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=820480&view=rev
Log:
FELIX-1668: Uses OSGi 1.0.0 libs instead of 1.2.0.
Modified:
felix/trunk/http/pom.xml
Modified: felix/trunk/http/pom.xml
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/felix/trunk/http/pom.xml?rev=820480&r1=820479&r2=820480&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- felix/trunk/http/pom.xml (original)
+++ felix/trunk/http/pom.xml Wed Sep 30 22:26:18 2009
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
<prerequisites>
<maven>2.0.7</maven>
</prerequisites>
-ï
+�
<properties>
<project.build.sourceEncoding>UTF-8</project.build.sourceEncoding>
</properties>
@@ -116,17 +116,17 @@
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId>
<artifactId>org.osgi.core</artifactId>
- <version>1.2.0</version>
+ <version>1.0.0</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId>
<artifactId>org.osgi.foundation</artifactId>
- <version>1.2.0</version>
+ <version>1.0.0</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId>
<artifactId>org.osgi.compendium</artifactId>
- <version>1.2.0</version>
+ <version>1.0.0</version>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId>
Re: svn commit: r820480 - /felix/trunk/http/pom.xml
Posted by Sten Roger Sandvik <sr...@x3m.com>.
Thanks. I was actually going to ask about that. Nice to be able to use
official OSGi modules rather than the felix ones.
BR,
Sten Roger Sandvik
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org>wrote:
> Sten,
>
> I modified the pom files to use the official OSGi JAR files from the maven
> repo...we don't want to use our OSGi JAR files at all any more.
>
> I also had to add core API dependencies to many of the pom files since the
> official compendium JAR does not have a dependency on core. Regardless, all
> explicit dependencies should be listed in the pom file of a given...Maven is
> not very modular in this regard, since it allows projects to inherit
> visibility to all transitive dependencies.
>
> So, I think the dependencies are ok now, but please check my changes.
>
> -> richard
>
> On 10/1/09 0:26, srs@apache.org wrote:
>
>> Author: srs
>> Date: Wed Sep 30 22:26:18 2009
>> New Revision: 820480
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=820480&view=rev
>> Log:
>> FELIX-1668: Uses OSGi 1.0.0 libs instead of 1.2.0.
>>
>> Modified:
>> felix/trunk/http/pom.xml
>>
>> Modified: felix/trunk/http/pom.xml
>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/felix/trunk/http/pom.xml?rev=820480&r1=820479&r2=820480&view=diff
>>
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- felix/trunk/http/pom.xml (original)
>> +++ felix/trunk/http/pom.xml Wed Sep 30 22:26:18 2009
>> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
>> <prerequisites>
>> <maven>2.0.7</maven>
>> </prerequisites>
>> -ï
>> +�
>> <properties>
>>
>> <project.build.sourceEncoding>UTF-8</project.build.sourceEncoding>
>> </properties>
>> @@ -116,17 +116,17 @@
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId>
>> <artifactId>org.osgi.core</artifactId>
>> -<version>1.2.0</version>
>> +<version>1.0.0</version>
>> </dependency>
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId>
>> <artifactId>org.osgi.foundation</artifactId>
>> -<version>1.2.0</version>
>> +<version>1.0.0</version>
>> </dependency>
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId>
>> <artifactId>org.osgi.compendium</artifactId>
>> -<version>1.2.0</version>
>> +<version>1.0.0</version>
>> <exclusions>
>> <exclusion>
>> <groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: svn commit: r820480 - /felix/trunk/http/pom.xml
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
Sten,
I modified the pom files to use the official OSGi JAR files from the
maven repo...we don't want to use our OSGi JAR files at all any more.
I also had to add core API dependencies to many of the pom files since
the official compendium JAR does not have a dependency on core.
Regardless, all explicit dependencies should be listed in the pom file
of a given...Maven is not very modular in this regard, since it allows
projects to inherit visibility to all transitive dependencies.
So, I think the dependencies are ok now, but please check my changes.
-> richard
On 10/1/09 0:26, srs@apache.org wrote:
> Author: srs
> Date: Wed Sep 30 22:26:18 2009
> New Revision: 820480
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=820480&view=rev
> Log:
> FELIX-1668: Uses OSGi 1.0.0 libs instead of 1.2.0.
>
> Modified:
> felix/trunk/http/pom.xml
>
> Modified: felix/trunk/http/pom.xml
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/felix/trunk/http/pom.xml?rev=820480&r1=820479&r2=820480&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- felix/trunk/http/pom.xml (original)
> +++ felix/trunk/http/pom.xml Wed Sep 30 22:26:18 2009
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
> <prerequisites>
> <maven>2.0.7</maven>
> </prerequisites>
> -ï
> +�
> <properties>
> <project.build.sourceEncoding>UTF-8</project.build.sourceEncoding>
> </properties>
> @@ -116,17 +116,17 @@
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId>
> <artifactId>org.osgi.core</artifactId>
> -<version>1.2.0</version>
> +<version>1.0.0</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId>
> <artifactId>org.osgi.foundation</artifactId>
> -<version>1.2.0</version>
> +<version>1.0.0</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId>
> <artifactId>org.osgi.compendium</artifactId>
> -<version>1.2.0</version>
> +<version>1.0.0</version>
> <exclusions>
> <exclusion>
> <groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId>
>
>
>