You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jdo-dev@db.apache.org by karan malhi <ka...@gmail.com> on 2005/09/11 23:53:50 UTC

JDO-131--updated maven.xml patch file

hi,

Here is the updated maven.xml.patch file. I have added the sysproperty 
to the doRuntck.iut goal also.

Michael Bouschen wrote:

> Hi Karan Singh,,
>
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> Do you think we would need the same property for the iut tests?  The 
>> patch which i submitted earlier does not add the sysproperty for iut 
>> tests in maven.xml.
>
>
> yes, I think we need the same property for the iut tests, so the goal 
> doRuntck.iut should add the sysproperty, too.
>
> Good catch!
>
> Regards Michael
>
>>
>> Michael Bouschen wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Karan Singh,
>>>
>>> nice work!
>>>
>>> I would like to propose three small changes:
>>> - All tck property names start with jdo.tck, so how about renaming 
>>> cleanup.data to jdo.tck.cleanupdata?
>>> - I propose to specify a default (true) for the new property in 
>>> JDO_Test. We could also call equalsIgnoreCase in the variable 
>>> initialization, then it is tested only once:
>>>    protected static boolean cleanupData =
>>>        System.getProperty("jdo.tck.cleanupdata", 
>>> "true").equalsIgnoreCase("true");
>>> - It looks like your IDE uses tabs for indentation (see the line 
>>> calling equlasIgnoreCase). Using blanks would have the advantage 
>>> that it looks the same in all the editors and IDEs.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Regards Michael
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I am submitting the patch files for review for JIRA issue 131.
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Index: 
>>>> C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/test/java/org/apache/jdo/tck/JDO_Test.java
>>>> ===================================================================
>>>> --- 
>>>> C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/test/java/org/apache/jdo/tck/JDO_Test.java    
>>>> (revision 279926)
>>>> +++ 
>>>> C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/test/java/org/apache/jdo/tck/JDO_Test.java    
>>>> (working copy)
>>>> @@ -137,6 +137,11 @@
>>>>     /** Name of the file contaninig the properties for the PMF. */
>>>>     protected static String PMFProperties = 
>>>> System.getProperty("PMFProperties");
>>>>
>>>> +    /** String indicating whether to clean up data after tests or 
>>>> not. The value can be either
>>>> +     * "true" or "false". If "false" then test will not clean up 
>>>> data from database
>>>> +     */
>>>> +    protected static String cleanupData = 
>>>> System.getProperty("cleanup.data");
>>>> +        /** The Properties object for the 
>>>> PersistenceManagerFactory. */
>>>>     protected static Properties PMFPropertiesObject;
>>>>
>>>> @@ -260,7 +265,9 @@
>>>>             pmf = null;
>>>>                 try {
>>>> -            localTearDown();
>>>> +            if (cleanupData.equalsIgnoreCase("true")) {
>>>> +                localTearDown();
>>>> +            }
>>>>         }         catch (Throwable t) {
>>>>             setTearDownThrowable("localTearDown", t);
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Index: C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/maven.xml
>>>> ===================================================================
>>>> --- C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/maven.xml    (revision 279926)
>>>> +++ C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/maven.xml    (working copy)
>>>> @@ -361,6 +361,8 @@
>>>>                          value="${jdo.tck.exclude}"/>
>>>>             <sysproperty key="jdo.tck.log.directory"
>>>>                          
>>>> value="${jdo.tck.log.directory}/${timestamp}"/>
>>>> +            <sysproperty key="cleanup.data"
>>>> +                         value="${cleanup.data}"/>               
>>>> <jvmarg line="${database.runtck.sysproperties}"/>
>>>>             <jvmarg line="${jdo.runtck.sysproperties}"/>
>>>>             <arg line="${jdo.tck.classes}"/>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Index: C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/project.properties
>>>> ===================================================================
>>>> --- C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/project.properties    (revision 279926)
>>>> +++ C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/project.properties    (working copy)
>>>> @@ -42,7 +42,8 @@
>>>> maven.junit.dir = ${jdo.tck.testdir}
>>>> maven.junit.sysproperties = PMFProperties
>>>> PMFProperties = jdori.properties
>>>> -
>>>> +# Setting this property to false will turn off cleanup of data 
>>>> from database to inspect database contents after test run
>>>> +cleanup.data = true
>>>> # JDO TCK settings
>>>> jdo.tck.dblist=derby
>>>> jdo.tck.identitytypes=applicationidentity datastoreidentity
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

-- 
Karan Singh


Re: JDO-131--updated maven.xml patch file

Posted by Karan Malhi <ka...@gmail.com>.
Hi Craig ,

I will rename the property and resubmit the patch. 

Regards

On 9/12/05, Craig Russell <Cr...@sun.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Karan,
> Just a few comments. The patch is in the right area and solves the 
> problem. I'd suggest
> 
> 1. Use a static protected final boolean variable, as Michael proposed.
> 
> 2. Change the name to jdo.tck.cleanupaftertest (with Michael's default of 
> true).
> 
> If you send a patch with these changes, Michael can check it in.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Craig
> 
> On Sep 11, 2005, at 2:53 PM, karan malhi wrote:
> 
> hi,
> 
> Here is the updated maven.xml.patch file. I have added the sysproperty to 
> the doRuntck.iut goal also.
> 
> Michael Bouschen wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Karan Singh,,
> 
> 
> Hi Michael,
> 
> Do you think we would need the same property for the iut tests? The patch 
> which i submitted earlier does not add the sysproperty for iut tests in 
> maven.xml.
> 
> 
> 
> yes, I think we need the same property for the iut tests, so the goal 
> doRuntck.iut should add the sysproperty, too.
> 
> Good catch!
> 
> Regards Michael
> 
> 
> 
> Michael Bouschen wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Karan Singh,
> 
> nice work!
> 
> I would like to propose three small changes:
> - All tck property names start with jdo.tck, so how about renaming 
> cleanup.data to jdo.tck.cleanupdata?
> - I propose to specify a default (true) for the new property in JDO_Test. 
> We could also call equalsIgnoreCase in the variable initialization, then it 
> is tested only once:
> protected static boolean cleanupData =
> System.getProperty("jdo.tck.cleanupdata", 
> "true").equalsIgnoreCase("true");
> - It looks like your IDE uses tabs for indentation (see the line calling 
> equlasIgnoreCase). Using blanks would have the advantage that it looks the 
> same in all the editors and IDEs.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Regards Michael
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am submitting the patch files for review for JIRA issue 131.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
> 
> Index: C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/test/java/org/apache/jdo/tck/JDO_Test.java
> ===================================================================
> --- C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/test/java/org/apache/jdo/tck/JDO_Test.java (revision 
> 279926)
> +++ C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/test/java/org/apache/jdo/tck/JDO_Test.java (working 
> copy)
> @@ -137,6 +137,11 @@
> /** Name of the file contaninig the properties for the PMF. */
> protected static String PMFProperties = System.getProperty
> ("PMFProperties");
> 
> + /** String indicating whether to clean up data after tests or not. The 
> value can be either
> + * "true" or "false". If "false" then test will not clean up data from 
> database
> + */
> + protected static String cleanupData = System.getProperty("cleanup.data
> ");
> + /** The Properties object for the PersistenceManagerFactory. */
> protected static Properties PMFPropertiesObject;
> 
> @@ -260,7 +265,9 @@
> pmf = null;
> try {
> - localTearDown();
> + if (cleanupData.equalsIgnoreCase("true")) {
> + localTearDown();
> + }
> } catch (Throwable t) {
> setTearDownThrowable("localTearDown", t);
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
> 
> Index: C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/maven.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/maven.xml (revision 279926)
> +++ C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/maven.xml (working copy)
> @@ -361,6 +361,8 @@
> value="${jdo.tck.exclude}"/>
> <sysproperty key="jdo.tck.log.directory"
> value="${jdo.tck.log.directory}/${timestamp}"/>
> + <sysproperty key="cleanup.data"
> + value="${cleanup.data}"/> <jvmarg line="${database.runtck.sysproperties
> }"/>
> <jvmarg line="${jdo.runtck.sysproperties}"/>
> <arg line="${jdo.tck.classes}"/>
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
> 
> Index: C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/project.properties
> ===================================================================
> --- C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/project.properties (revision 279926)
> +++ C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/project.properties (working copy)
> @@ -42,7 +42,8 @@
> maven.junit.dir = ${jdo.tck.testdir}
> maven.junit.sysproperties = PMFProperties
> PMFProperties = jdori.properties
> -
> +# Setting this property to false will turn off cleanup of data from 
> database to inspect database contents after test run
> +cleanup.data = true
> # JDO TCK settings
> jdo.tck.dblist=derby
> jdo.tck.identitytypes=applicationidentity datastoreidentity
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Karan Singh
> 
> Index: C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/maven.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/maven.xml (revision 279926)
> +++ C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/maven.xml (working copy)
> @@ -314,6 +314,8 @@
> value="${jdo.tck.exclude}"/>
> <sysproperty key="jdo.tck.log.directory"
> value="${jdo.tck.log.directory}/${timestamp}"/>
> + <sysproperty key="jdo.tck.cleanupData"
> + value="${jdo.tck.cleanupData}"/> 
> <jvmarg line="${database.runtck.sysproperties}"/>
> <jvmarg line="${iut.runtck.sysproperties}"/>
> <arg line="${jdo.tck.classes}"/>
> @@ -361,6 +363,8 @@
> value="${jdo.tck.exclude}"/>
> <sysproperty key="jdo.tck.log.directory"
> value="${jdo.tck.log.directory}/${timestamp}"/>
> + <sysproperty key="jdo.tck.cleanupData"
> + value="${jdo.tck.cleanupData}"/> 
> <jvmarg line="${database.runtck.sysproperties}"/>
> <jvmarg line="${jdo.runtck.sysproperties}"/>
> <arg line="${jdo.tck.classes}"/>
> 
> 
> Craig Russell
> 
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com <Cr...@sun.com>
> 
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Karan Malhi

Re: JDO-131--updated maven.xml patch file

Posted by Craig Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Karan,

Just a few comments. The patch is in the right area and solves the  
problem. I'd suggest

1. Use a static protected final boolean variable, as Michael proposed.

2. Change the name to jdo.tck.cleanupaftertest (with Michael's  
default of true).

If you send a patch with these changes, Michael can check it in.

Thanks,

Craig

On Sep 11, 2005, at 2:53 PM, karan malhi wrote:

> hi,
>
> Here is the updated maven.xml.patch file. I have added the  
> sysproperty to the doRuntck.iut goal also.
>
> Michael Bouschen wrote:
>
>
>> Hi Karan Singh,,
>>
>>
>>> Hi Michael,
>>>
>>> Do you think we would need the same property for the iut tests?   
>>> The patch which i submitted earlier does not add the sysproperty  
>>> for iut tests in maven.xml.
>>>
>>
>>
>> yes, I think we need the same property for the iut tests, so the  
>> goal doRuntck.iut should add the sysproperty, too.
>>
>> Good catch!
>>
>> Regards Michael
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Michael Bouschen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi Karan Singh,
>>>>
>>>> nice work!
>>>>
>>>> I would like to propose three small changes:
>>>> - All tck property names start with jdo.tck, so how about  
>>>> renaming cleanup.data to jdo.tck.cleanupdata?
>>>> - I propose to specify a default (true) for the new property in  
>>>> JDO_Test. We could also call equalsIgnoreCase in the variable  
>>>> initialization, then it is tested only once:
>>>>    protected static boolean cleanupData =
>>>>        System.getProperty("jdo.tck.cleanupdata",  
>>>> "true").equalsIgnoreCase("true");
>>>> - It looks like your IDE uses tabs for indentation (see the line  
>>>> calling equlasIgnoreCase). Using blanks would have the advantage  
>>>> that it looks the same in all the editors and IDEs.
>>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> Regards Michael
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am submitting the patch files for review for JIRA issue 131.
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>>>> ------
>>>>>
>>>>> Index: C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/test/java/org/apache/jdo/tck/ 
>>>>> JDO_Test.java
>>>>> ================================================================== 
>>>>> =
>>>>> --- C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/test/java/org/apache/jdo/tck/ 
>>>>> JDO_Test.java    (revision 279926)
>>>>> +++ C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/test/java/org/apache/jdo/tck/ 
>>>>> JDO_Test.java    (working copy)
>>>>> @@ -137,6 +137,11 @@
>>>>>     /** Name of the file contaninig the properties for the PMF. */
>>>>>     protected static String PMFProperties = System.getProperty 
>>>>> ("PMFProperties");
>>>>>
>>>>> +    /** String indicating whether to clean up data after tests  
>>>>> or not. The value can be either
>>>>> +     * "true" or "false". If "false" then test will not clean  
>>>>> up data from database
>>>>> +     */
>>>>> +    protected static String cleanupData = System.getProperty 
>>>>> ("cleanup.data");
>>>>> +        /** The Properties object for the  
>>>>> PersistenceManagerFactory. */
>>>>>     protected static Properties PMFPropertiesObject;
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -260,7 +265,9 @@
>>>>>             pmf = null;
>>>>>                 try {
>>>>> -            localTearDown();
>>>>> +            if (cleanupData.equalsIgnoreCase("true")) {
>>>>> +                localTearDown();
>>>>> +            }
>>>>>         }         catch (Throwable t) {
>>>>>             setTearDownThrowable("localTearDown", t);
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>>>> ------
>>>>>
>>>>> Index: C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/maven.xml
>>>>> ================================================================== 
>>>>> =
>>>>> --- C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/maven.xml    (revision 279926)
>>>>> +++ C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/maven.xml    (working copy)
>>>>> @@ -361,6 +361,8 @@
>>>>>                          value="${jdo.tck.exclude}"/>
>>>>>             <sysproperty key="jdo.tck.log.directory"
>>>>>                          value="${jdo.tck.log.directory}/$ 
>>>>> {timestamp}"/>
>>>>> +            <sysproperty key="cleanup.data"
>>>>> +                         value="${cleanup.data}"/ 
>>>>> >               <jvmarg line="${database.runtck.sysproperties}"/>
>>>>>             <jvmarg line="${jdo.runtck.sysproperties}"/>
>>>>>             <arg line="${jdo.tck.classes}"/>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>>>> ------
>>>>>
>>>>> Index: C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/project.properties
>>>>> ================================================================== 
>>>>> =
>>>>> --- C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/project.properties    (revision  
>>>>> 279926)
>>>>> +++ C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/project.properties    (working copy)
>>>>> @@ -42,7 +42,8 @@
>>>>> maven.junit.dir = ${jdo.tck.testdir}
>>>>> maven.junit.sysproperties = PMFProperties
>>>>> PMFProperties = jdori.properties
>>>>> -
>>>>> +# Setting this property to false will turn off cleanup of data  
>>>>> from database to inspect database contents after test run
>>>>> +cleanup.data = true
>>>>> # JDO TCK settings
>>>>> jdo.tck.dblist=derby
>>>>> jdo.tck.identitytypes=applicationidentity datastoreidentity
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> Karan Singh
>
> Index: C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/maven.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/maven.xml    (revision 279926)
> +++ C:/ApacheJDO/trunk/tck20/maven.xml    (working copy)
> @@ -314,6 +314,8 @@
>                           value="${jdo.tck.exclude}"/>
>              <sysproperty key="jdo.tck.log.directory"
>                           value="${jdo.tck.log.directory}/$ 
> {timestamp}"/>
> +             <sysproperty key="jdo.tck.cleanupData"
> +                         value="${jdo.tck.cleanupData}"/>
>              <jvmarg line="${database.runtck.sysproperties}"/>
>              <jvmarg line="${iut.runtck.sysproperties}"/>
>              <arg line="${jdo.tck.classes}"/>
> @@ -361,6 +363,8 @@
>                           value="${jdo.tck.exclude}"/>
>              <sysproperty key="jdo.tck.log.directory"
>                           value="${jdo.tck.log.directory}/$ 
> {timestamp}"/>
> +            <sysproperty key="jdo.tck.cleanupData"
> +                         value="${jdo.tck.cleanupData}"/>
>              <jvmarg line="${database.runtck.sysproperties}"/>
>              <jvmarg line="${jdo.runtck.sysproperties}"/>
>              <arg line="${jdo.tck.classes}"/>
>

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!