You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> on 2015/11/14 01:39:31 UTC

[VOTE] The 1st HBase 1.0.3 release candidate (RC0) is available

The 1st HBase 1.0.3 release candidate (RC0) is available for download at
http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/1.0.3RC0/ and Maven artifacts are also
available in the temporary repository
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1119/ .

The API compatibility report with respect to the previous release can be
found at
http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/1.0.2_1.0.3RC0_compat_report.html .
There are no reported source compatibility issues with user facing public
or LimitedPrivate interfaces. There are no reported binary compatibility
issues with user facing public interfaces. A constant was changed in
RegionServerSnapshotManager, classified as LimitedPrivate. This change was
made in commit 25b4427 by Enis, the branch RM for 1.0.

Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.

The 76 issues resolved in this release can be found at
http://s.apache.org/0Cc .

Please try out the candidate and vote +1/0/-1. This vote will be open for
at least 72 hours. Unless objection I will try to close it Monday October
23, 2015 if we have sufficient votes. Three +1 votes from PMC will be
required to release.

-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 1.0.3 release candidate (RC0) is available

Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
s/October/November/ . Sorry about the paste-o.


On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:

> The 1st HBase 1.0.3 release candidate (RC0) is available for download at
> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/1.0.3RC0/ and Maven artifacts are also
> available in the temporary repository
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1119/ .
>
> The API compatibility report with respect to the previous release can be
> found at
> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/1.0.2_1.0.3RC0_compat_report.html .
> There are no reported source compatibility issues with user facing public
> or LimitedPrivate interfaces. There are no reported binary compatibility
> issues with user facing public interfaces. A constant was changed in
> RegionServerSnapshotManager, classified as LimitedPrivate. This change was
> made in commit 25b4427 by Enis, the branch RM for 1.0.
>
> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>
> The 76 issues resolved in this release can be found at
> http://s.apache.org/0Cc .
>
> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/0/-1. This vote will be open for
> at least 72 hours. Unless objection I will try to close it Monday October
> 23, 2015 if we have sufficient votes. Three +1 votes from PMC will be
> required to release.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 1.0.3 release candidate (RC0) is available

Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Ok, let's sink this RC.


On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@apache.org> wrote:

> Likely this patch broke something:
>
> commit 4c4a4353898aef35016c342f997eba6e439cc039
>
> Author: Enis Soztutar <en...@apache.org>
>
> Date:   Wed Oct 28 18:16:32 2015 -0700
>
>
>     HBASE-14689 Addendum and unit test for HBASE-13471
>
>
> It was supposed to bring the logic around that to be on par with
> branch-1.1+. Looking into it.
>
> Enis
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I have run PE on the 1.0.3 RC, and most of the handlers were blocked at
> > the getRegionLockInternal() call. Also noticed these in the logs:
> >
> > 015-11-17 18:29:39,717 WARN
> [B.defaultRpcServer.handler=18,queue=0,port=58215] regionserver.HRegion:
> Failed getting lock in batch put, row=00000000000000000000132949
> > java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row:
> 00000000000000000000132949
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:3995)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2661)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2519)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2473)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2477)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:654)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:618)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:1864)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:31451)
> >       at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2049)
> >       at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:111)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108)
> >       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> > 2015-11-17 18:29:39,717 WARN
> [B.defaultRpcServer.handler=14,queue=2,port=58215] regionserver.HRegion:
> Failed getting lock in batch put, row=00000000000000000000178256
> > java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row:
> 00000000000000000000178256
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:3995)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2661)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2519)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2473)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2477)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:654)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:618)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:1864)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:31451)
> >       at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2049)
> >       at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:111)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108)
> >       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> > 2015-11-17 18:29:39,717 WARN
> [B.defaultRpcServer.handler=6,queue=0,port=58215] regionserver.HRegion:
> Failed getting lock in batch put, row=00000000000000000000198294
> > java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row:
> 00000000000000000000198294
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:3995)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2661)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2519)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2473)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2477)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:654)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:618)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:1864)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:31451)
> >       at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2049)
> >       at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:111)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108)
> >       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> > 2015-11-17 18:29:39,717 WARN
> [B.defaultRpcServer.handler=17,queue=2,port=58215] regionserver.HRegion:
> Failed getting lock in batch put, row=00000000000000000000173891
> > java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row:
> 00000000000000000000173891
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:3995)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2661)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2519)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2473)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2477)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:654)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:618)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:1864)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:31451)
> >       at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2049)
> >       at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:111)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108)
> >       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> > 2015-11-17 18:29:39,718 WARN
> [B.defaultRpcServer.handler=3,queue=0,port=58215] regionserver.HRegion:
> Failed getting lock in batch put, row=00000000000000000000202900
> > java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row:
> 00000000000000000000202900
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:3995)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2661)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2519)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2473)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2477)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:654)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:618)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:1864)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:31451)
> >       at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2049)
> >       at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:111)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133)
> >       at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108)
> >       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Indeed. I'll see about finishing my evaluation of both RCs and
> >> investigating this behavior this evening.
> >>
> >> On Monday, November 16, 2015, Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Standalone.
> >> >
> >> > Perhaps if you attach a profiler to the JVM running the test something
> >> > interesting will turn up.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > On Nov 16, 2015, at 10:34 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@apache.org
> >> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Your LTT ran vs a cluster, or in standalone mode? My run in
> >> standalone is
> >> > > failing consistently due to GC pause. I suppose it's possible my HDD
> >> is
> >> > > failing, but the same test ran without incident with the the 1.1 RC,
> >> and
> >> > > also with the.0.98 RC. Perhaps there's a perf degradation on 1.0
> >> that's
> >> > > been resolved on 1.1, exhibited by the conditions of my single
> >> machine?
> >> > As
> >> > > this is the terminal release of the 1.0 line and no one else has
> >> observed
> >> > > issues, I'm inclined to proceed despite the test failure.
> >> > >
> >> > >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> apurtell@apache.org
> >> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> +1
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Built from source
> >> > >> RAT check passes
> >> > >> Loaded 1M rows with LoadTestTool, no unexpected log messages,
> >> reported
> >> > >> latencies in line with expectations
> >> > >> Ran IntegrationTestBigLinkedList, no errors
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> apurtell@apache.org
> >> > <javascript:;>>
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> The 1st HBase 1.0.3 release candidate (RC0) is available for
> >> download
> >> > at
> >> > >>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/1.0.3RC0/ and Maven artifacts
> >> are
> >> > >> also
> >> > >>> available in the temporary repository
> >> > >>>
> >> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1119/
> >> > >> .
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> The API compatibility report with respect to the previous release
> >> can
> >> > be
> >> > >>> found at
> >> > >>>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/1.0.2_1.0.3RC0_compat_report.html .
> >> > >>> There are no reported source compatibility issues with user facing
> >> > public
> >> > >>> or LimitedPrivate interfaces. There are no reported binary
> >> > compatibility
> >> > >>> issues with user facing public interfaces. A constant was changed
> in
> >> > >>> RegionServerSnapshotManager, classified as LimitedPrivate. This
> >> change
> >> > >> was
> >> > >>> made in commit 25b4427 by Enis, the branch RM for 1.0.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> The 76 issues resolved in this release can be found at
> >> > >>> http://s.apache.org/0Cc .
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/0/-1. This vote will be
> >> open
> >> > for
> >> > >>> at least 72 hours. Unless objection I will try to close it Monday
> >> > October
> >> > >>> 23, 2015 if we have sufficient votes. Three +1 votes from PMC will
> >> be
> >> > >>> required to release.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> --
> >> > >>> Best regards,
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>   - Andy
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. -
> Piet
> >> > Hein
> >> > >>> (via Tom White)
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> --
> >> > >> Best regards,
> >> > >>
> >> > >>   - Andy
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> >> Hein
> >> > >> (via Tom White)
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 1.0.3 release candidate (RC0) is available

Posted by Enis Söztutar <en...@apache.org>.
Likely this patch broke something:

commit 4c4a4353898aef35016c342f997eba6e439cc039

Author: Enis Soztutar <en...@apache.org>

Date:   Wed Oct 28 18:16:32 2015 -0700


    HBASE-14689 Addendum and unit test for HBASE-13471


It was supposed to bring the logic around that to be on par with
branch-1.1+. Looking into it.

Enis

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@apache.org> wrote:

> I have run PE on the 1.0.3 RC, and most of the handlers were blocked at
> the getRegionLockInternal() call. Also noticed these in the logs:
>
> 015-11-17 18:29:39,717 WARN  [B.defaultRpcServer.handler=18,queue=0,port=58215] regionserver.HRegion: Failed getting lock in batch put, row=00000000000000000000132949
> java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row: 00000000000000000000132949
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:3995)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2661)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2519)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2473)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2477)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:654)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:618)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:1864)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:31451)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2049)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:111)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108)
> 	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> 2015-11-17 18:29:39,717 WARN  [B.defaultRpcServer.handler=14,queue=2,port=58215] regionserver.HRegion: Failed getting lock in batch put, row=00000000000000000000178256
> java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row: 00000000000000000000178256
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:3995)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2661)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2519)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2473)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2477)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:654)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:618)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:1864)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:31451)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2049)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:111)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108)
> 	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> 2015-11-17 18:29:39,717 WARN  [B.defaultRpcServer.handler=6,queue=0,port=58215] regionserver.HRegion: Failed getting lock in batch put, row=00000000000000000000198294
> java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row: 00000000000000000000198294
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:3995)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2661)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2519)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2473)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2477)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:654)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:618)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:1864)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:31451)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2049)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:111)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108)
> 	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> 2015-11-17 18:29:39,717 WARN  [B.defaultRpcServer.handler=17,queue=2,port=58215] regionserver.HRegion: Failed getting lock in batch put, row=00000000000000000000173891
> java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row: 00000000000000000000173891
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:3995)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2661)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2519)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2473)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2477)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:654)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:618)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:1864)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:31451)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2049)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:111)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108)
> 	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> 2015-11-17 18:29:39,718 WARN  [B.defaultRpcServer.handler=3,queue=0,port=58215] regionserver.HRegion: Failed getting lock in batch put, row=00000000000000000000202900
> java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row: 00000000000000000000202900
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:3995)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2661)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2519)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2473)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2477)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:654)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:618)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:1864)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:31451)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2049)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:111)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108)
> 	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Indeed. I'll see about finishing my evaluation of both RCs and
>> investigating this behavior this evening.
>>
>> On Monday, November 16, 2015, Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Standalone.
>> >
>> > Perhaps if you attach a profiler to the JVM running the test something
>> > interesting will turn up.
>> >
>> >
>> > > On Nov 16, 2015, at 10:34 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@apache.org
>> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Your LTT ran vs a cluster, or in standalone mode? My run in
>> standalone is
>> > > failing consistently due to GC pause. I suppose it's possible my HDD
>> is
>> > > failing, but the same test ran without incident with the the 1.1 RC,
>> and
>> > > also with the.0.98 RC. Perhaps there's a perf degradation on 1.0
>> that's
>> > > been resolved on 1.1, exhibited by the conditions of my single
>> machine?
>> > As
>> > > this is the terminal release of the 1.0 line and no one else has
>> observed
>> > > issues, I'm inclined to proceed despite the test failure.
>> > >
>> > >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
>> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> +1
>> > >>
>> > >> Built from source
>> > >> RAT check passes
>> > >> Loaded 1M rows with LoadTestTool, no unexpected log messages,
>> reported
>> > >> latencies in line with expectations
>> > >> Ran IntegrationTestBigLinkedList, no errors
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
>> > <javascript:;>>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> The 1st HBase 1.0.3 release candidate (RC0) is available for
>> download
>> > at
>> > >>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/1.0.3RC0/ and Maven artifacts
>> are
>> > >> also
>> > >>> available in the temporary repository
>> > >>>
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1119/
>> > >> .
>> > >>>
>> > >>> The API compatibility report with respect to the previous release
>> can
>> > be
>> > >>> found at
>> > >>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/1.0.2_1.0.3RC0_compat_report.html .
>> > >>> There are no reported source compatibility issues with user facing
>> > public
>> > >>> or LimitedPrivate interfaces. There are no reported binary
>> > compatibility
>> > >>> issues with user facing public interfaces. A constant was changed in
>> > >>> RegionServerSnapshotManager, classified as LimitedPrivate. This
>> change
>> > >> was
>> > >>> made in commit 25b4427 by Enis, the branch RM for 1.0.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> The 76 issues resolved in this release can be found at
>> > >>> http://s.apache.org/0Cc .
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/0/-1. This vote will be
>> open
>> > for
>> > >>> at least 72 hours. Unless objection I will try to close it Monday
>> > October
>> > >>> 23, 2015 if we have sufficient votes. Three +1 votes from PMC will
>> be
>> > >>> required to release.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> --
>> > >>> Best regards,
>> > >>>
>> > >>>   - Andy
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
>> > Hein
>> > >>> (via Tom White)
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Best regards,
>> > >>
>> > >>   - Andy
>> > >>
>> > >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
>> Hein
>> > >> (via Tom White)
>> > >>
>> >
>>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 1.0.3 release candidate (RC0) is available

Posted by Enis Söztutar <en...@apache.org>.
I have run PE on the 1.0.3 RC, and most of the handlers were blocked at the
getRegionLockInternal() call. Also noticed these in the logs:

015-11-17 18:29:39,717 WARN
[B.defaultRpcServer.handler=18,queue=0,port=58215]
regionserver.HRegion: Failed getting lock in batch put,
row=00000000000000000000132949
java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row:
00000000000000000000132949
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:3995)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2661)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2519)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2473)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2477)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:654)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:618)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:1864)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:31451)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2049)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:111)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
2015-11-17 18:29:39,717 WARN
[B.defaultRpcServer.handler=14,queue=2,port=58215]
regionserver.HRegion: Failed getting lock in batch put,
row=00000000000000000000178256
java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row:
00000000000000000000178256
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:3995)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2661)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2519)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2473)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2477)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:654)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:618)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:1864)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:31451)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2049)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:111)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
2015-11-17 18:29:39,717 WARN
[B.defaultRpcServer.handler=6,queue=0,port=58215]
regionserver.HRegion: Failed getting lock in batch put,
row=00000000000000000000198294
java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row:
00000000000000000000198294
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:3995)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2661)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2519)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2473)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2477)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:654)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:618)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:1864)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:31451)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2049)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:111)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
2015-11-17 18:29:39,717 WARN
[B.defaultRpcServer.handler=17,queue=2,port=58215]
regionserver.HRegion: Failed getting lock in batch put,
row=00000000000000000000173891
java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row:
00000000000000000000173891
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:3995)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2661)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2519)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2473)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2477)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:654)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:618)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:1864)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:31451)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2049)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:111)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
2015-11-17 18:29:39,718 WARN
[B.defaultRpcServer.handler=3,queue=0,port=58215]
regionserver.HRegion: Failed getting lock in batch put,
row=00000000000000000000202900
java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for lock for row:
00000000000000000000202900
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.getRowLockInternal(HRegion.java:3995)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:2661)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2519)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2473)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:2477)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:654)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:618)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:1864)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:31451)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2049)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:111)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:133)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:108)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)


On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Indeed. I'll see about finishing my evaluation of both RCs and
> investigating this behavior this evening.
>
> On Monday, November 16, 2015, Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Standalone.
> >
> > Perhaps if you attach a profiler to the JVM running the test something
> > interesting will turn up.
> >
> >
> > > On Nov 16, 2015, at 10:34 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Your LTT ran vs a cluster, or in standalone mode? My run in standalone
> is
> > > failing consistently due to GC pause. I suppose it's possible my HDD is
> > > failing, but the same test ran without incident with the the 1.1 RC,
> and
> > > also with the.0.98 RC. Perhaps there's a perf degradation on 1.0 that's
> > > been resolved on 1.1, exhibited by the conditions of my single machine?
> > As
> > > this is the terminal release of the 1.0 line and no one else has
> observed
> > > issues, I'm inclined to proceed despite the test failure.
> > >
> > >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> Built from source
> > >> RAT check passes
> > >> Loaded 1M rows with LoadTestTool, no unexpected log messages, reported
> > >> latencies in line with expectations
> > >> Ran IntegrationTestBigLinkedList, no errors
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> The 1st HBase 1.0.3 release candidate (RC0) is available for download
> > at
> > >>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/1.0.3RC0/ and Maven artifacts are
> > >> also
> > >>> available in the temporary repository
> > >>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1119/
> > >> .
> > >>>
> > >>> The API compatibility report with respect to the previous release can
> > be
> > >>> found at
> > >>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/1.0.2_1.0.3RC0_compat_report.html
> .
> > >>> There are no reported source compatibility issues with user facing
> > public
> > >>> or LimitedPrivate interfaces. There are no reported binary
> > compatibility
> > >>> issues with user facing public interfaces. A constant was changed in
> > >>> RegionServerSnapshotManager, classified as LimitedPrivate. This
> change
> > >> was
> > >>> made in commit 25b4427 by Enis, the branch RM for 1.0.
> > >>>
> > >>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> > >>>
> > >>> The 76 issues resolved in this release can be found at
> > >>> http://s.apache.org/0Cc .
> > >>>
> > >>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/0/-1. This vote will be open
> > for
> > >>> at least 72 hours. Unless objection I will try to close it Monday
> > October
> > >>> 23, 2015 if we have sufficient votes. Three +1 votes from PMC will be
> > >>> required to release.
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Best regards,
> > >>>
> > >>>   - Andy
> > >>>
> > >>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein
> > >>> (via Tom White)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Best regards,
> > >>
> > >>   - Andy
> > >>
> > >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > >> (via Tom White)
> > >>
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 1.0.3 release candidate (RC0) is available

Posted by Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com>.
Indeed. I'll see about finishing my evaluation of both RCs and
investigating this behavior this evening.

On Monday, November 16, 2015, Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Standalone.
>
> Perhaps if you attach a profiler to the JVM running the test something
> interesting will turn up.
>
>
> > On Nov 16, 2015, at 10:34 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@apache.org
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > Your LTT ran vs a cluster, or in standalone mode? My run in standalone is
> > failing consistently due to GC pause. I suppose it's possible my HDD is
> > failing, but the same test ran without incident with the the 1.1 RC, and
> > also with the.0.98 RC. Perhaps there's a perf degradation on 1.0 that's
> > been resolved on 1.1, exhibited by the conditions of my single machine?
> As
> > this is the terminal release of the 1.0 line and no one else has observed
> > issues, I'm inclined to proceed despite the test failure.
> >
> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Built from source
> >> RAT check passes
> >> Loaded 1M rows with LoadTestTool, no unexpected log messages, reported
> >> latencies in line with expectations
> >> Ran IntegrationTestBigLinkedList, no errors
> >>
> >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The 1st HBase 1.0.3 release candidate (RC0) is available for download
> at
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/1.0.3RC0/ and Maven artifacts are
> >> also
> >>> available in the temporary repository
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1119/
> >> .
> >>>
> >>> The API compatibility report with respect to the previous release can
> be
> >>> found at
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/1.0.2_1.0.3RC0_compat_report.html .
> >>> There are no reported source compatibility issues with user facing
> public
> >>> or LimitedPrivate interfaces. There are no reported binary
> compatibility
> >>> issues with user facing public interfaces. A constant was changed in
> >>> RegionServerSnapshotManager, classified as LimitedPrivate. This change
> >> was
> >>> made in commit 25b4427 by Enis, the branch RM for 1.0.
> >>>
> >>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> >>>
> >>> The 76 issues resolved in this release can be found at
> >>> http://s.apache.org/0Cc .
> >>>
> >>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/0/-1. This vote will be open
> for
> >>> at least 72 hours. Unless objection I will try to close it Monday
> October
> >>> 23, 2015 if we have sufficient votes. Three +1 votes from PMC will be
> >>> required to release.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Best regards,
> >>>
> >>>   - Andy
> >>>
> >>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> >>> (via Tom White)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >>   - Andy
> >>
> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> >> (via Tom White)
> >>
>

Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 1.0.3 release candidate (RC0) is available

Posted by Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>.
Standalone.

Perhaps if you attach a profiler to the JVM running the test something interesting will turn up. 


> On Nov 16, 2015, at 10:34 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Your LTT ran vs a cluster, or in standalone mode? My run in standalone is
> failing consistently due to GC pause. I suppose it's possible my HDD is
> failing, but the same test ran without incident with the the 1.1 RC, and
> also with the.0.98 RC. Perhaps there's a perf degradation on 1.0 that's
> been resolved on 1.1, exhibited by the conditions of my single machine? As
> this is the terminal release of the 1.0 line and no one else has observed
> issues, I'm inclined to proceed despite the test failure.
> 
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> Built from source
>> RAT check passes
>> Loaded 1M rows with LoadTestTool, no unexpected log messages, reported
>> latencies in line with expectations
>> Ran IntegrationTestBigLinkedList, no errors
>> 
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> The 1st HBase 1.0.3 release candidate (RC0) is available for download at
>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/1.0.3RC0/ and Maven artifacts are
>> also
>>> available in the temporary repository
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1119/
>> .
>>> 
>>> The API compatibility report with respect to the previous release can be
>>> found at
>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/1.0.2_1.0.3RC0_compat_report.html .
>>> There are no reported source compatibility issues with user facing public
>>> or LimitedPrivate interfaces. There are no reported binary compatibility
>>> issues with user facing public interfaces. A constant was changed in
>>> RegionServerSnapshotManager, classified as LimitedPrivate. This change
>> was
>>> made in commit 25b4427 by Enis, the branch RM for 1.0.
>>> 
>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>>> 
>>> The 76 issues resolved in this release can be found at
>>> http://s.apache.org/0Cc .
>>> 
>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/0/-1. This vote will be open for
>>> at least 72 hours. Unless objection I will try to close it Monday October
>>> 23, 2015 if we have sufficient votes. Three +1 votes from PMC will be
>>> required to release.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>> 
>>>   - Andy
>>> 
>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>>> (via Tom White)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> 
>>   - Andy
>> 
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)
>> 

Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 1.0.3 release candidate (RC0) is available

Posted by Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org>.
Your LTT ran vs a cluster, or in standalone mode? My run in standalone is
failing consistently due to GC pause. I suppose it's possible my HDD is
failing, but the same test ran without incident with the the 1.1 RC, and
also with the.0.98 RC. Perhaps there's a perf degradation on 1.0 that's
been resolved on 1.1, exhibited by the conditions of my single machine? As
this is the terminal release of the 1.0 line and no one else has observed
issues, I'm inclined to proceed despite the test failure.

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> Built from source
> RAT check passes
> Loaded 1M rows with LoadTestTool, no unexpected log messages, reported
> latencies in line with expectations
> Ran IntegrationTestBigLinkedList, no errors
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > The 1st HBase 1.0.3 release candidate (RC0) is available for download at
> > http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/1.0.3RC0/ and Maven artifacts are
> also
> > available in the temporary repository
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1119/
> .
> >
> > The API compatibility report with respect to the previous release can be
> > found at
> > http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/1.0.2_1.0.3RC0_compat_report.html .
> > There are no reported source compatibility issues with user facing public
> > or LimitedPrivate interfaces. There are no reported binary compatibility
> > issues with user facing public interfaces. A constant was changed in
> > RegionServerSnapshotManager, classified as LimitedPrivate. This change
> was
> > made in commit 25b4427 by Enis, the branch RM for 1.0.
> >
> > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> >
> > The 76 issues resolved in this release can be found at
> > http://s.apache.org/0Cc .
> >
> > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/0/-1. This vote will be open for
> > at least 72 hours. Unless objection I will try to close it Monday October
> > 23, 2015 if we have sufficient votes. Three +1 votes from PMC will be
> > required to release.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>

Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 1.0.3 release candidate (RC0) is available

Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
+1

Built from source
RAT check passes
Loaded 1M rows with LoadTestTool, no unexpected log messages, reported
latencies in line with expectations
Ran IntegrationTestBigLinkedList, no errors

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:

> The 1st HBase 1.0.3 release candidate (RC0) is available for download at
> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/1.0.3RC0/ and Maven artifacts are also
> available in the temporary repository
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1119/ .
>
> The API compatibility report with respect to the previous release can be
> found at
> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/1.0.2_1.0.3RC0_compat_report.html .
> There are no reported source compatibility issues with user facing public
> or LimitedPrivate interfaces. There are no reported binary compatibility
> issues with user facing public interfaces. A constant was changed in
> RegionServerSnapshotManager, classified as LimitedPrivate. This change was
> made in commit 25b4427 by Enis, the branch RM for 1.0.
>
> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>
> The 76 issues resolved in this release can be found at
> http://s.apache.org/0Cc .
>
> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/0/-1. This vote will be open for
> at least 72 hours. Unless objection I will try to close it Monday October
> 23, 2015 if we have sufficient votes. Three +1 votes from PMC will be
> required to release.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)