You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Jonathan Ellis (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/11/03 19:39:33 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-8241) Use javac instead of javassist
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14194868#comment-14194868 ]
Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-8241:
-------------------------------------------
This may still be a good idea, but doesn't this mean users need to deploy a JDK (which has stricter license requirements) and not just a JRE?
> Use javac instead of javassist
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-8241
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8241
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Robert Stupp
> Assignee: Robert Stupp
> Labels: udf
> Fix For: 3.0
>
> Attachments: udf-java-javac.txt
>
>
> Using JDK's built-in Java-Compiler API has some advantages over javassist.
> Although compilation feels a bit slower, Java compiler API has some advantages:
> * boxing + unboxing works
> * generics work
> * compiler error messages are better (or at least known) and have line/column numbers
> The implementation does not use any temp files. Everything's in memory.
> Patch attached to this issue.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)