You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tomcat.apache.org by Rilak Kun <ku...@gmail.com> on 2015/07/15 04:20:51 UTC
Mark async-supported=true for non-asynchronous servlets
Hello,
I have only one servlet definition in my web.xml. This servlet acts as
a bridge servlet for delegating requests to the actual 50 servlets in
my application. I would like to make one of the 50 servlets
async-supported. I can think of two ways to do it:
1. Create another bridge servlet for handling asynchronous servlets,
and specify async-supported=true only for this servlet.
2. Just add async-supported=true to the existing servlet definition,
even though only 1 out of my 50 servlets supports asynchronous mode.
Are there any bad implications for going with option #2? I did a quick
test with #2 and my application seems to run fine, but I am not sure
if it will create performance or scalability issues.
I try to look for similar question in the forum and from the web, but
I am not able to find an assertive answer to it.
I am running Tomcat 7.0.
Thank you!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Mark async-supported=true for non-asynchronous servlets
Posted by Rilak Kun <ku...@gmail.com>.
This is great news. Thank you Mark!
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 16 July 2015 21:49:33 CEST, Rilak Kun <ku...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Getting back to my original question... is there any harm if I make
>>the front servlet async-supported all the time, even though not all my
>>application servlets support asynchronous mode?
>
> No. Assuming that your front servlet isn't doing anything that will break under async (from your description of it I think you'll be ok).
>
> Mark
>
>
>>
>>Thank you!
>>
>>On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Rilak Kun <ku...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks Chris for the suggestion, but since our application runs in
>>> OSGi, we need a different mechanism for loading classes/plugins
>>lazily
>>> (and our servlet classes need to be loaded using OSGi class loader).
>>> We are using Equinox servletbridge library, which defines a bridge
>>> servlet I mentioned earlier, for delegating requests to our
>>> application servlets, and doing the tedious job of setting the right
>>> class loader and loading application plugins at the right time.
>>>
>>> In the long run, we should look into a different way of registering
>>> our OSGi servlets which will allow us to control the async mode of
>>> each servlet independently, but this is not a trivial task, so I am
>>> trying to see if there are any possible workarounds meanwhile.
>>>
>>> Any additional feedback or pointers are welcome!
>>>
>>> Rilak
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
>>> <ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA256
>>>>
>>>> Rilak,
>>>>
>>>> On 7/14/15 11:06 PM, Rilak Kun wrote:
>>>>> Our application is running in OSGi. Servlets are contributed via
>>>>> Eclipse extension point, so they can be registered in different
>>>>> plugins without changing the web.xml.
>>>>
>>>> When a servlet is registered, you can map it to a URL at the same
>>time
>>>> programmatically. Modifying web.xml is not necessary.
>>>>
>>>> - -chris
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>>>>
>>>> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVptEoAAoJEBzwKT+lPKRYln4P/R/Z9dD8RqNo+HXVoNfoRwXe
>>>> NU/XROl0gYsIvioGqfJvPrVQiS4gBWKD81/O2LGNeHBYGNqC5kUdYhtEKS52V1He
>>>> 03H80TIkTB17b2Xv6zknoKjnsxUIBDYe3jn5DIfQvh20jVDr75jWTHKSYh4hGMqc
>>>> LiQpxCotijltA0BDtHFgixH0FVaXQQumh9ylMN7LOMwLDul+8NPrbRrqAobWTs+t
>>>> eS999tK4Uu++qQdXCUXysF9bESWtpkzXeAPuEPEgSQaFaxhVHZwSr74pgD2playt
>>>> /ZKO0u397sMwSyI4uE96B5DlGu5cPNhHknTw7/VKuo4VfYcd4FmSzo9hCV4YRx0n
>>>> qKUi/vnWOAXCvoy1/VCmyrIRttVYSuq29q/8sIRjapDNnszxRJsxy5i5jvHR7xgV
>>>> /HdsPLKw7QbBxMd3jERpc2TWOaAwBq5/XqOXdc9zk6I936gQWZU+ayW49oYg9RL/
>>>> Ea+jZQsDdLypTCinry3p+5On9FPc9AUblUDhwSYyWrlGpHAyASNgjOiAJIxxEDej
>>>> 2UcOWpfeO9ueJFQba9fyzBVfG+8p+qv8DhBMiBhSE9S8hYK47eVLtACea6aAv0Sb
>>>> APbIg9K5z4LtIu/7M7xaDNHmOxkiqyzJLcBa5wIe461Dfstm20TXUhlHGmamABdk
>>>> 0I5q6RuKTAc9FJa48EvX
>>>> =Kap9
>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>
>>>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>>>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Mark async-supported=true for non-asynchronous servlets
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 16 July 2015 21:49:33 CEST, Rilak Kun <ku...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Getting back to my original question... is there any harm if I make
>the front servlet async-supported all the time, even though not all my
>application servlets support asynchronous mode?
No. Assuming that your front servlet isn't doing anything that will break under async (from your description of it I think you'll be ok).
Mark
>
>Thank you!
>
>On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Rilak Kun <ku...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks Chris for the suggestion, but since our application runs in
>> OSGi, we need a different mechanism for loading classes/plugins
>lazily
>> (and our servlet classes need to be loaded using OSGi class loader).
>> We are using Equinox servletbridge library, which defines a bridge
>> servlet I mentioned earlier, for delegating requests to our
>> application servlets, and doing the tedious job of setting the right
>> class loader and loading application plugins at the right time.
>>
>> In the long run, we should look into a different way of registering
>> our OSGi servlets which will allow us to control the async mode of
>> each servlet independently, but this is not a trivial task, so I am
>> trying to see if there are any possible workarounds meanwhile.
>>
>> Any additional feedback or pointers are welcome!
>>
>> Rilak
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
>> <ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA256
>>>
>>> Rilak,
>>>
>>> On 7/14/15 11:06 PM, Rilak Kun wrote:
>>>> Our application is running in OSGi. Servlets are contributed via
>>>> Eclipse extension point, so they can be registered in different
>>>> plugins without changing the web.xml.
>>>
>>> When a servlet is registered, you can map it to a URL at the same
>time
>>> programmatically. Modifying web.xml is not necessary.
>>>
>>> - -chris
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>>>
>>> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVptEoAAoJEBzwKT+lPKRYln4P/R/Z9dD8RqNo+HXVoNfoRwXe
>>> NU/XROl0gYsIvioGqfJvPrVQiS4gBWKD81/O2LGNeHBYGNqC5kUdYhtEKS52V1He
>>> 03H80TIkTB17b2Xv6zknoKjnsxUIBDYe3jn5DIfQvh20jVDr75jWTHKSYh4hGMqc
>>> LiQpxCotijltA0BDtHFgixH0FVaXQQumh9ylMN7LOMwLDul+8NPrbRrqAobWTs+t
>>> eS999tK4Uu++qQdXCUXysF9bESWtpkzXeAPuEPEgSQaFaxhVHZwSr74pgD2playt
>>> /ZKO0u397sMwSyI4uE96B5DlGu5cPNhHknTw7/VKuo4VfYcd4FmSzo9hCV4YRx0n
>>> qKUi/vnWOAXCvoy1/VCmyrIRttVYSuq29q/8sIRjapDNnszxRJsxy5i5jvHR7xgV
>>> /HdsPLKw7QbBxMd3jERpc2TWOaAwBq5/XqOXdc9zk6I936gQWZU+ayW49oYg9RL/
>>> Ea+jZQsDdLypTCinry3p+5On9FPc9AUblUDhwSYyWrlGpHAyASNgjOiAJIxxEDej
>>> 2UcOWpfeO9ueJFQba9fyzBVfG+8p+qv8DhBMiBhSE9S8hYK47eVLtACea6aAv0Sb
>>> APbIg9K5z4LtIu/7M7xaDNHmOxkiqyzJLcBa5wIe461Dfstm20TXUhlHGmamABdk
>>> 0I5q6RuKTAc9FJa48EvX
>>> =Kap9
>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>
>>>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>>>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Mark async-supported=true for non-asynchronous servlets
Posted by Rilak Kun <ku...@gmail.com>.
Getting back to my original question... is there any harm if I make
the front servlet async-supported all the time, even though not all my
application servlets support asynchronous mode?
Thank you!
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Rilak Kun <ku...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Chris for the suggestion, but since our application runs in
> OSGi, we need a different mechanism for loading classes/plugins lazily
> (and our servlet classes need to be loaded using OSGi class loader).
> We are using Equinox servletbridge library, which defines a bridge
> servlet I mentioned earlier, for delegating requests to our
> application servlets, and doing the tedious job of setting the right
> class loader and loading application plugins at the right time.
>
> In the long run, we should look into a different way of registering
> our OSGi servlets which will allow us to control the async mode of
> each servlet independently, but this is not a trivial task, so I am
> trying to see if there are any possible workarounds meanwhile.
>
> Any additional feedback or pointers are welcome!
>
> Rilak
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
> <ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Rilak,
>>
>> On 7/14/15 11:06 PM, Rilak Kun wrote:
>>> Our application is running in OSGi. Servlets are contributed via
>>> Eclipse extension point, so they can be registered in different
>>> plugins without changing the web.xml.
>>
>> When a servlet is registered, you can map it to a URL at the same time
>> programmatically. Modifying web.xml is not necessary.
>>
>> - -chris
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>>
>> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVptEoAAoJEBzwKT+lPKRYln4P/R/Z9dD8RqNo+HXVoNfoRwXe
>> NU/XROl0gYsIvioGqfJvPrVQiS4gBWKD81/O2LGNeHBYGNqC5kUdYhtEKS52V1He
>> 03H80TIkTB17b2Xv6zknoKjnsxUIBDYe3jn5DIfQvh20jVDr75jWTHKSYh4hGMqc
>> LiQpxCotijltA0BDtHFgixH0FVaXQQumh9ylMN7LOMwLDul+8NPrbRrqAobWTs+t
>> eS999tK4Uu++qQdXCUXysF9bESWtpkzXeAPuEPEgSQaFaxhVHZwSr74pgD2playt
>> /ZKO0u397sMwSyI4uE96B5DlGu5cPNhHknTw7/VKuo4VfYcd4FmSzo9hCV4YRx0n
>> qKUi/vnWOAXCvoy1/VCmyrIRttVYSuq29q/8sIRjapDNnszxRJsxy5i5jvHR7xgV
>> /HdsPLKw7QbBxMd3jERpc2TWOaAwBq5/XqOXdc9zk6I936gQWZU+ayW49oYg9RL/
>> Ea+jZQsDdLypTCinry3p+5On9FPc9AUblUDhwSYyWrlGpHAyASNgjOiAJIxxEDej
>> 2UcOWpfeO9ueJFQba9fyzBVfG+8p+qv8DhBMiBhSE9S8hYK47eVLtACea6aAv0Sb
>> APbIg9K5z4LtIu/7M7xaDNHmOxkiqyzJLcBa5wIe461Dfstm20TXUhlHGmamABdk
>> 0I5q6RuKTAc9FJa48EvX
>> =Kap9
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Mark async-supported=true for non-asynchronous servlets
Posted by Rilak Kun <ku...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Chris for the suggestion, but since our application runs in
OSGi, we need a different mechanism for loading classes/plugins lazily
(and our servlet classes need to be loaded using OSGi class loader).
We are using Equinox servletbridge library, which defines a bridge
servlet I mentioned earlier, for delegating requests to our
application servlets, and doing the tedious job of setting the right
class loader and loading application plugins at the right time.
In the long run, we should look into a different way of registering
our OSGi servlets which will allow us to control the async mode of
each servlet independently, but this is not a trivial task, so I am
trying to see if there are any possible workarounds meanwhile.
Any additional feedback or pointers are welcome!
Rilak
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
<ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Rilak,
>
> On 7/14/15 11:06 PM, Rilak Kun wrote:
>> Our application is running in OSGi. Servlets are contributed via
>> Eclipse extension point, so they can be registered in different
>> plugins without changing the web.xml.
>
> When a servlet is registered, you can map it to a URL at the same time
> programmatically. Modifying web.xml is not necessary.
>
> - -chris
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>
> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVptEoAAoJEBzwKT+lPKRYln4P/R/Z9dD8RqNo+HXVoNfoRwXe
> NU/XROl0gYsIvioGqfJvPrVQiS4gBWKD81/O2LGNeHBYGNqC5kUdYhtEKS52V1He
> 03H80TIkTB17b2Xv6zknoKjnsxUIBDYe3jn5DIfQvh20jVDr75jWTHKSYh4hGMqc
> LiQpxCotijltA0BDtHFgixH0FVaXQQumh9ylMN7LOMwLDul+8NPrbRrqAobWTs+t
> eS999tK4Uu++qQdXCUXysF9bESWtpkzXeAPuEPEgSQaFaxhVHZwSr74pgD2playt
> /ZKO0u397sMwSyI4uE96B5DlGu5cPNhHknTw7/VKuo4VfYcd4FmSzo9hCV4YRx0n
> qKUi/vnWOAXCvoy1/VCmyrIRttVYSuq29q/8sIRjapDNnszxRJsxy5i5jvHR7xgV
> /HdsPLKw7QbBxMd3jERpc2TWOaAwBq5/XqOXdc9zk6I936gQWZU+ayW49oYg9RL/
> Ea+jZQsDdLypTCinry3p+5On9FPc9AUblUDhwSYyWrlGpHAyASNgjOiAJIxxEDej
> 2UcOWpfeO9ueJFQba9fyzBVfG+8p+qv8DhBMiBhSE9S8hYK47eVLtACea6aAv0Sb
> APbIg9K5z4LtIu/7M7xaDNHmOxkiqyzJLcBa5wIe461Dfstm20TXUhlHGmamABdk
> 0I5q6RuKTAc9FJa48EvX
> =Kap9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Mark async-supported=true for non-asynchronous servlets
Posted by Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Rilak,
On 7/14/15 11:06 PM, Rilak Kun wrote:
> Our application is running in OSGi. Servlets are contributed via
> Eclipse extension point, so they can be registered in different
> plugins without changing the web.xml.
When a servlet is registered, you can map it to a URL at the same time
programmatically. Modifying web.xml is not necessary.
- -chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org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=Kap9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Mark async-supported=true for non-asynchronous servlets
Posted by Rilak Kun <ku...@gmail.com>.
Hello Chris,
Our application is running in OSGi. Servlets are contributed via
Eclipse extension point, so they can be registered in different
plugins without changing the web.xml.
Thank you!
Rilak
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Christopher Schultz
<ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Rilak,
>
> On 7/14/15 9:20 PM, Rilak Kun wrote:
>> I have only one servlet definition in my web.xml. This servlet acts
>> as a bridge servlet for delegating requests to the actual 50
>> servlets in my application. I would like to make one of the 50
>> servlets async-supported.
>
> I'm curious: why not use those servlets directly instead of through a
> front-servlet?
>
> - -chris
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>
> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVpdJ9AAoJEBzwKT+lPKRYK4AQAKsSXvmytsE/LHwA8v2oEJA5
> G7kY2ojAZEGE89J280oKqoe8u4LipkYo52t2nO24wekhtK6taZ1Ez8tmrb96F7/M
> /H6knth7FOLWaqbPyCi8Bu7Wxk54UJG12QmfGYmI/cXGMgGkJTGufD3FZK+rdVo2
> zKZQ3/AsbWyH8F6lKsJH5jfzY40d0HgPYwAQhoPN91aeeqJZYGhaY6+gcnmm8Cku
> 1lyu1xau+TuftC+NtA9Tl6oIE+4HkBbsknr4+AvRQtYUmvQnMeEvSb2InxwPbayt
> KBE36F4R+79X3L12fBJ1tI5zYFfqpUvVPWcawHnitNlubfv2A1oIsNPBDbwBBKql
> B/kaWJiXvNK7o/yhB//HS49wlvyH+/F0+IF3aSQD519tRlfU27NeYrl2JaSw1KlY
> DsjDxWoQZ2+o8P0ca2wmryWw+cDRyALY1cegKLDJGGx6RQmxIiI4VYPAFP5kB7tn
> 16PkD4ILcLQH4DOuwpSXeMXD00bkQtTZn2p7tGMTlQTzRWxuYfb5OZwOU2TLr87R
> 38eChXCJdFIY5ZE7uh1m9ma07L6OK2CpWuZDXv6cy6bALEZCUO9/GiZqz8f4acif
> +XqNqcwfXNwpMLmh6dgObJswGw60C1VEfGznS+xB8Dzb5oq2f9iHNC1a8iG+DH2o
> TlzSsGarFNk3oSA4T/56
> =HwO2
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Mark async-supported=true for non-asynchronous servlets
Posted by Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Rilak,
On 7/14/15 9:20 PM, Rilak Kun wrote:
> I have only one servlet definition in my web.xml. This servlet acts
> as a bridge servlet for delegating requests to the actual 50
> servlets in my application. I would like to make one of the 50
> servlets async-supported.
I'm curious: why not use those servlets directly instead of through a
front-servlet?
- -chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org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=HwO2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org