You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by kk...@apache.org on 2010/03/08 11:55:28 UTC
svn commit: r920265 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Author: kkolinko
Date: Mon Mar 8 10:55:28 2010
New Revision: 920265
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=920265&view=rev
Log:
vote
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=920265&r1=920264&r2=920265&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Mon Mar 8 10:55:28 2010
@@ -121,10 +121,17 @@
+1: kkolinko
+1: markt with http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=920055&view=rev
-1:
+ kkolinko: +1 with 920055
+
+ 3)
+ http://people.apache.org/~kkolinko/patches/2010-03-07_tc7_48668_Compiler.patch
+ +1: kkolinko
+ -1:
* Follow up for https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668
Make handling of isELIgnored and isDeferredSyntaxAllowedAsLiteral consistent
This is *NOT* required for spec compliance
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=920110&view=rev
+1: markt, jfclere
- -1:
+ -1: kkolinko: JSP 2.0 spec chapter "Backwards Compatibility with JSP 1.2" (page xx (20 of 478))
+ does not mention it. So I think it is against the spec. See r920055 thread on dev@.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org