You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sling.apache.org by "Bertrand Delacretaz (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/02/06 16:35:00 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (SLING-8110) Take "extensions" service
property into account for path-mounted servlets
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17031736#comment-17031736 ]
Bertrand Delacretaz edited comment on SLING-8110 at 2/6/20 4:34 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
At [commit cab578f13|https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-servlets-resolver/commit/cab578f13c9c7c2e9479baf7d4bac691e10ace70] the core of this is implemented.
To finalize this feature I need to also implement the SLING-9055 {{SlingServletPathsStrict}} annotation along with the corresponding OSGi capabilities changes so that code that uses that annotation requires the appropriate version of the {{o.a.s.servlets.resolver}} bundle.
was (Author: bdelacretaz):
At [commit cab578f13|https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-servlets-resolver/commit/cab578f13c9c7c2e9479baf7d4bac691e10ace70] the core of this is implemented.
To finalize this feature I need to also implement the SLING-9055 {{SlingServletPathsStrict}} along with the corresponding OSGi capabilities changes so that code that uses that annotation requires the appropriate version of the {{o.a.s.servlets.resolver}} bundle.
> Take "extensions" service property into account for path-mounted servlets
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-8110
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8110
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Servlets
> Reporter: Bertrand Delacretaz
> Assignee: Bertrand Delacretaz
> Priority: Minor
>
> If a Sling Servlet has both _paths_ and _extensions_ service properties, currently the _paths_ take over and the _extensions_ are ignored.
> This has caused confusion with users who have set both properties on a servlet - my initial thought was to reject such illegal combinations, but a colleague rightly notes that it would make sense to honor the _extensions_ property as well, and only route requests to that servlet if there's a match on the extension.
> This requires more analysis, for now I'm just creating this ticket to remind us to have another look.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)