You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> on 2009/08/19 20:00:23 UTC
possibly including the BSFAnnotator in the sandbox release 2.3.0
While working on including the BSFAnnotator in the sandbox release, I
noticed it has 6 jar files in its "lib" directory. The NOTICE file says
that the project includes some components under MPL and SPL; however,
the information needed to associate each of this included 3rd-party jar
files with the proper license is missing.
Can someone who knows identify the source of the following jars:
bsf.jar
bsh-bsf.jar
bsh.jar
commons-logging-api-1.1.jar
js.jar
log4j-1.2.15.jar
I typed bsf.jar into google and got to the Apache Jakarta site. I
downloaded and unzipped their release, and found the jars are different
- I suspect, due to version / level changes.
Do we need to update/upgrade any of these Jars?
Is there a better way to package / distribute this in binary form?
Also, I noticed that the POM section for building the documentation is
commented out - because there is no docbook style documentation. The
documentation seems limited to a README and some examples. Is there
additional documentation available for this?
-Marshall
Re: possibly including the BSFAnnotator in the sandbox release 2.3.0
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Olivier Terrier wrote:
> Hi Marshall
>
> When I donated the BSFAnnotator about two years ago I was not very
> familiar with the maven-based Apache UIMA build process... And I'm
> afraid I'm still not be.
>
>
>> While working on including the BSFAnnotator in the sandbox release, I
>> noticed it has 6 jar files in its "lib" directory. The NOTICE file
>> says
>> that the project includes some components under MPL and SPL; however,
>> the information needed to associate each of this included 3rd-party
>>
> jar
>
>> files with the proper license is missing.
>>
>> Can someone who knows identify the source of the following jars:
>>
>> bsf.jar
>>
> Apache 2 license
> Comes from
> http://apache.crihan.fr/dist/jakarta/bsf/binaries/bsf-bin-2.4.0.zip
>
>
>> bsh-bsf.jar
>>
> No longer needed: can be removed
>
>
>> bsh.jar
>>
> Dual licensed under both the SPL and LGPL => SPL is in the list of
> acceptable licenses available here:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
> Can be replaced by http://www.beanshell.org/bsh-1.3.0.jar (which now
> contains the bsh-bsf.jar classes)
>
>
>
>> commons-logging-api-1.1.jar
>>
> Apache 2 license
> Comes from
> http://archive.apache.org/dist/commons/logging/binaries/commons-logging-
> 1.1.zip
>
>
>> js.jar
>>
> Dual licensed under both the MPL 1.1 and GPL => MPL is in the list of
> acceptable licenses available here:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
> Comes from ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/js/rhino1_6R7.zip
>
>
>> log4j-1.2.15.jar
>>
> Apache 2 license
> Comes from
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/logging/log4j/1.2.15/apache-log4j-1
> .2.15.zip
>
>
>> Is there a better way to package / distribute this in binary form?
>>
> Probably using maven dependencies but I don't have enough maven-skills
> to do it myself
>
>
>> Also, I noticed that the POM section for building the documentation is
>> commented out - because there is no docbook style documentation. The
>> documentation seems limited to a README and some examples. Is there
>> additional documentation available for this?
>>
> No: just the README sorry
>
> I guess that a real revamping should use the JSR-223 (javax.script)
> which is included in Java 1.6 and add support to new popular scripting
> languages like groovy, beanshell 2.0 etc...
>
>
>
Thanks for responding! I'll update the project with this information.
-Marshall
>> -Marshall
>>
>
>
>
RE: possibly including the BSFAnnotator in the sandbox release 2.3.0
Posted by Olivier Terrier <ol...@temis.com>.
OK I have a look
Cheers
Olivier
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Marshall Schor [mailto:msa@schor.com]
> Envoyé : jeudi 20 août 2009 16:52
> À : uima-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Objet : Re: possibly including the BSFAnnotator in the sandbox release
> 2.3.0
>
> Hi Olivier -
>
> I updated the project:
> removed the bsf-bsh.jar
> updated the bsh.jar to bsh-1.3.0.jar
>
> I changed the POM so it didn't depend on the bsf-bsh.jar and changed
> the
> dependency of the bsh.jar to bsh-1.3.0.jar.
>
> When I tried to build it, it failed when running the
> testAnnotatorAggregated. (The tests ran before I did these updates)
>
> The error was: caused by org.apache.bsf.BSFException: the application
> script threw an exception:
> java.lang.NullPointerException: Null Pointer in Method Invocation
>
> at bsh.util.BeanShellBSFEngine.call(Unknown Source)
> at
> org.apache.uima.annotator.bsf.BSFAnnotator.initialize(BSFAnnotator.java
> :161)
>
> Can you take a look?
>
> I've check in the updated project - you should be able to just check it
> out.
>
> Thanks. -Marshall
>
> Olivier Terrier wrote:
> > Hi Marshall
> >
> > When I donated the BSFAnnotator about two years ago I was not very
> > familiar with the maven-based Apache UIMA build process... And I'm
> > afraid I'm still not be.
> >
> >
> >> While working on including the BSFAnnotator in the sandbox release,
> I
> >> noticed it has 6 jar files in its "lib" directory. The NOTICE file
> >> says
> >> that the project includes some components under MPL and SPL;
> however,
> >> the information needed to associate each of this included 3rd-party
> >>
> > jar
> >
> >> files with the proper license is missing.
> >>
> >> Can someone who knows identify the source of the following jars:
> >>
> >> bsf.jar
> >>
> > Apache 2 license
> > Comes from
> > http://apache.crihan.fr/dist/jakarta/bsf/binaries/bsf-bin-2.4.0.zip
> >
> >
> >> bsh-bsf.jar
> >>
> > No longer needed: can be removed
> >
> >
> >> bsh.jar
> >>
> > Dual licensed under both the SPL and LGPL => SPL is in the list of
> > acceptable licenses available here:
> > http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
> > Can be replaced by http://www.beanshell.org/bsh-1.3.0.jar (which now
> > contains the bsh-bsf.jar classes)
> >
> >
> >
> >> commons-logging-api-1.1.jar
> >>
> > Apache 2 license
> > Comes from
> > http://archive.apache.org/dist/commons/logging/binaries/commons-
> logging-
> > 1.1.zip
> >
> >
> >> js.jar
> >>
> > Dual licensed under both the MPL 1.1 and GPL => MPL is in the list of
> > acceptable licenses available here:
> > http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
> > Comes from ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/js/rhino1_6R7.zip
> >
> >
> >> log4j-1.2.15.jar
> >>
> > Apache 2 license
> > Comes from
> > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/logging/log4j/1.2.15/apache-
> log4j-1
> > .2.15.zip
> >
> >
> >> Is there a better way to package / distribute this in binary form?
> >>
> > Probably using maven dependencies but I don't have enough maven-
> skills
> > to do it myself
> >
> >
> >> Also, I noticed that the POM section for building the documentation
> is
> >> commented out - because there is no docbook style documentation.
> The
> >> documentation seems limited to a README and some examples. Is there
> >> additional documentation available for this?
> >>
> > No: just the README sorry
> >
> > I guess that a real revamping should use the JSR-223 (javax.script)
> > which is included in Java 1.6 and add support to new popular
> scripting
> > languages like groovy, beanshell 2.0 etc...
> >
> >
> >
> >> -Marshall
> >>
> >
> >
> >
Re: possibly including the BSFAnnotator in the sandbox release 2.3.0
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Hi Olivier -
I updated the project:
removed the bsf-bsh.jar
updated the bsh.jar to bsh-1.3.0.jar
I changed the POM so it didn't depend on the bsf-bsh.jar and changed the
dependency of the bsh.jar to bsh-1.3.0.jar.
When I tried to build it, it failed when running the
testAnnotatorAggregated. (The tests ran before I did these updates)
The error was: caused by org.apache.bsf.BSFException: the application
script threw an exception:
java.lang.NullPointerException: Null Pointer in Method Invocation
at bsh.util.BeanShellBSFEngine.call(Unknown Source)
at
org.apache.uima.annotator.bsf.BSFAnnotator.initialize(BSFAnnotator.java:161)
Can you take a look?
I've check in the updated project - you should be able to just check it out.
Thanks. -Marshall
Olivier Terrier wrote:
> Hi Marshall
>
> When I donated the BSFAnnotator about two years ago I was not very
> familiar with the maven-based Apache UIMA build process... And I'm
> afraid I'm still not be.
>
>
>> While working on including the BSFAnnotator in the sandbox release, I
>> noticed it has 6 jar files in its "lib" directory. The NOTICE file
>> says
>> that the project includes some components under MPL and SPL; however,
>> the information needed to associate each of this included 3rd-party
>>
> jar
>
>> files with the proper license is missing.
>>
>> Can someone who knows identify the source of the following jars:
>>
>> bsf.jar
>>
> Apache 2 license
> Comes from
> http://apache.crihan.fr/dist/jakarta/bsf/binaries/bsf-bin-2.4.0.zip
>
>
>> bsh-bsf.jar
>>
> No longer needed: can be removed
>
>
>> bsh.jar
>>
> Dual licensed under both the SPL and LGPL => SPL is in the list of
> acceptable licenses available here:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
> Can be replaced by http://www.beanshell.org/bsh-1.3.0.jar (which now
> contains the bsh-bsf.jar classes)
>
>
>
>> commons-logging-api-1.1.jar
>>
> Apache 2 license
> Comes from
> http://archive.apache.org/dist/commons/logging/binaries/commons-logging-
> 1.1.zip
>
>
>> js.jar
>>
> Dual licensed under both the MPL 1.1 and GPL => MPL is in the list of
> acceptable licenses available here:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
> Comes from ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/js/rhino1_6R7.zip
>
>
>> log4j-1.2.15.jar
>>
> Apache 2 license
> Comes from
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/logging/log4j/1.2.15/apache-log4j-1
> .2.15.zip
>
>
>> Is there a better way to package / distribute this in binary form?
>>
> Probably using maven dependencies but I don't have enough maven-skills
> to do it myself
>
>
>> Also, I noticed that the POM section for building the documentation is
>> commented out - because there is no docbook style documentation. The
>> documentation seems limited to a README and some examples. Is there
>> additional documentation available for this?
>>
> No: just the README sorry
>
> I guess that a real revamping should use the JSR-223 (javax.script)
> which is included in Java 1.6 and add support to new popular scripting
> languages like groovy, beanshell 2.0 etc...
>
>
>
>> -Marshall
>>
>
>
>
RE: possibly including the BSFAnnotator in the sandbox release 2.3.0
Posted by Olivier Terrier <ol...@temis.com>.
Hi Marshall
When I donated the BSFAnnotator about two years ago I was not very
familiar with the maven-based Apache UIMA build process... And I'm
afraid I'm still not be.
> While working on including the BSFAnnotator in the sandbox release, I
> noticed it has 6 jar files in its "lib" directory. The NOTICE file
> says
> that the project includes some components under MPL and SPL; however,
> the information needed to associate each of this included 3rd-party
jar
> files with the proper license is missing.
>
> Can someone who knows identify the source of the following jars:
>
> bsf.jar
Apache 2 license
Comes from
http://apache.crihan.fr/dist/jakarta/bsf/binaries/bsf-bin-2.4.0.zip
> bsh-bsf.jar
No longer needed: can be removed
> bsh.jar
Dual licensed under both the SPL and LGPL => SPL is in the list of
acceptable licenses available here:
http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
Can be replaced by http://www.beanshell.org/bsh-1.3.0.jar (which now
contains the bsh-bsf.jar classes)
> commons-logging-api-1.1.jar
Apache 2 license
Comes from
http://archive.apache.org/dist/commons/logging/binaries/commons-logging-
1.1.zip
> js.jar
Dual licensed under both the MPL 1.1 and GPL => MPL is in the list of
acceptable licenses available here:
http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
Comes from ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/js/rhino1_6R7.zip
> log4j-1.2.15.jar
Apache 2 license
Comes from
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/logging/log4j/1.2.15/apache-log4j-1
.2.15.zip
> Is there a better way to package / distribute this in binary form?
Probably using maven dependencies but I don't have enough maven-skills
to do it myself
>
> Also, I noticed that the POM section for building the documentation is
> commented out - because there is no docbook style documentation. The
> documentation seems limited to a README and some examples. Is there
> additional documentation available for this?
No: just the README sorry
I guess that a real revamping should use the JSR-223 (javax.script)
which is included in Java 1.6 and add support to new popular scripting
languages like groovy, beanshell 2.0 etc...
>
> -Marshall