You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@apr.apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> on 2004/11/21 02:10:52 UTC
Re: svn commit: r106038 - in apr/apr/branches: 0.9.x APR_0_9_BRANCH
wrowe@apache.org wrote:
>
> Author: wrowe
> Date: Sat Nov 20 14:46:04 2004
> New Revision: 106038
>
> Added:
> apr/apr/branches/0.9.x/
> - copied from r106037, apr/apr/branches/APR_0_9_BRANCH/
> Removed:
> apr/apr/branches/APR_0_9_BRANCH/
> Log:
> Reorganize the apr project 0.9 branches
>
Quick question (I *know* I should have hit at least one SVN
preso/BOF @ Ac2004, but there it is): if I already checked-out
the APR_0_9_BRANCH, how do I change it, locally, to the 0.9.x
one? I don't have to re-checkout, do I?
Also, more a generic question, why didn't we svn move instead of
cvn copy ?
Re: svn commit: r106038 - in apr/apr/branches: 0.9.x APR_0_9_BRANCH
Posted by Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com>.
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> wrowe@apache.org wrote:
>
>>Author: wrowe
>>Date: Sat Nov 20 14:46:04 2004
>>New Revision: 106038
>>
>>Added:
>> apr/apr/branches/0.9.x/
>> - copied from r106037, apr/apr/branches/APR_0_9_BRANCH/
>>Removed:
>> apr/apr/branches/APR_0_9_BRANCH/
>>Log:
>>Reorganize the apr project 0.9 branches
>>
>
>
> Quick question (I *know* I should have hit at least one SVN
> preso/BOF @ Ac2004, but there it is): if I already checked-out
> the APR_0_9_BRANCH, how do I change it, locally, to the 0.9.x
> one? I don't have to re-checkout, do I?
Nope:
svn switch --help
(from inside your working copy)
svn switch https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/branches/0.9.x
> Also, more a generic question, why didn't we svn move instead of
> cvn copy ?
a svn 'move' currently is implemented as a copy and then rm of the old
location.
Re: svn commit: r106038 - in apr/apr/branches: 0.9.x APR_0_9_BRANCH
Posted by André Malo <nd...@perlig.de>.
* Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
> wrowe@apache.org wrote:
> >
> > Author: wrowe
> > Date: Sat Nov 20 14:46:04 2004
> > New Revision: 106038
> >
> > Added:
> > apr/apr/branches/0.9.x/
> > - copied from r106037, apr/apr/branches/APR_0_9_BRANCH/
> > Removed:
> > apr/apr/branches/APR_0_9_BRANCH/
> > Log:
> > Reorganize the apr project 0.9 branches
> >
>
> Quick question (I *know* I should have hit at least one SVN
> preso/BOF @ Ac2004, but there it is): if I already checked-out
> the APR_0_9_BRANCH, how do I change it, locally, to the 0.9.x
> one? I don't have to re-checkout, do I?
See OtherBill's posting on dev@httpd. You just need to svn switch.
> Also, more a generic question, why didn't we svn move instead of
> cvn copy ?
move := copy && delete (but atomic)
nd
--
Winnetous Erbe: <http://pub.perlig.de/books.html#apache2>
Re: svn commit: r106038 - in apr/apr/branches: 0.9.x
APR_0_9_BRANCH
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
At 07:10 PM 11/20/2004, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>wrowe@apache.org wrote:
>>
>> Author: wrowe
>> Date: Sat Nov 20 14:46:04 2004
>> New Revision: 106038
>>
>> Added:
>> apr/apr/branches/0.9.x/
>> - copied from r106037, apr/apr/branches/APR_0_9_BRANCH/
>> Removed:
>> apr/apr/branches/APR_0_9_BRANCH/
>> Log:
>> Reorganize the apr project 0.9 branches
>>
>
>Quick question (I *know* I should have hit at least one SVN
>preso/BOF @ Ac2004, but there it is): if I already checked-out
>the APR_0_9_BRANCH, how do I change it, locally, to the 0.9.x
>one? I don't have to re-checkout, do I?
Nope - that's one happy detail svn considered; see the post
Subject: [SVN] Branches for apr[-util|-iconv] 0.9.x moved
for details of how to switch.
>Also, more a generic question, why didn't we svn move instead of
>cvn copy ?
We did, that's how the commit message appears (copy foo from bar,
removed bar.)
Bill