You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@beam.apache.org by Udi Meiri <ud...@apache.org> on 2021/09/27 20:29:02 UTC
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release 2.33.0, release candidate #1
I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release.
There are 8 approving votes, 4 of which are binding:
* Ahmet Altay
* Alexey Romanenko
* Robert Bradshaw
* Chamikara Jayalath
There are no disapproving votes.
Thanks everyone!
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release 2.33.0, release candidate #1
Posted by Claire McGinty <cl...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Udi! I just tagged you in a cherrypick PR.
- Claire
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 3:39 PM Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com> wrote:
> Yes, we can include this fix in RC2. I haven't started preparing it yet.
> Could someone prepare a cherrypick?
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:10 AM Ryan Skraba <ry...@skraba.com> wrote:
>
>> Just to follow up -- the cherry-pick of
>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15616 changes the default value of
>> a configuration option that appears for the first time in 2.33.0.
>>
>> I think it's a strong argument for making the change now, before
>> unwary developers start using the wrong default. I understand that
>> it's *extremely* late in the release cycle!
>>
>> All my best, Ryan
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 6:50 PM Alexey Romanenko
>> <ar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Is it still possible to cherry-pick this fix [1][2] since it’s a recent
>> regression that touches pipelines in production?
>> >
>> > [1] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15616
>> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12628
>> >
>> > On 28 Sep 2021, at 03:31, Udi Meiri <ud...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > I spoke too soon. We will be doing an rc2
>> >
>> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 1:29 PM Udi Meiri <ud...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release.
>> >>
>> >> There are 8 approving votes, 4 of which are binding:
>> >> * Ahmet Altay
>> >> * Alexey Romanenko
>> >> * Robert Bradshaw
>> >> * Chamikara Jayalath
>> >>
>> >> There are no disapproving votes.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks everyone!
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release 2.33.0, release candidate #1
Posted by Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com>.
Yes, we can include this fix in RC2. I haven't started preparing it yet.
Could someone prepare a cherrypick?
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:10 AM Ryan Skraba <ry...@skraba.com> wrote:
> Just to follow up -- the cherry-pick of
> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15616 changes the default value of
> a configuration option that appears for the first time in 2.33.0.
>
> I think it's a strong argument for making the change now, before
> unwary developers start using the wrong default. I understand that
> it's *extremely* late in the release cycle!
>
> All my best, Ryan
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 6:50 PM Alexey Romanenko
> <ar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Is it still possible to cherry-pick this fix [1][2] since it’s a recent
> regression that touches pipelines in production?
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15616
> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12628
> >
> > On 28 Sep 2021, at 03:31, Udi Meiri <ud...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > I spoke too soon. We will be doing an rc2
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 1:29 PM Udi Meiri <ud...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release.
> >>
> >> There are 8 approving votes, 4 of which are binding:
> >> * Ahmet Altay
> >> * Alexey Romanenko
> >> * Robert Bradshaw
> >> * Chamikara Jayalath
> >>
> >> There are no disapproving votes.
> >>
> >> Thanks everyone!
> >>
> >
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release 2.33.0, release candidate #1
Posted by Ryan Skraba <ry...@skraba.com>.
Just to follow up -- the cherry-pick of
https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15616 changes the default value of
a configuration option that appears for the first time in 2.33.0.
I think it's a strong argument for making the change now, before
unwary developers start using the wrong default. I understand that
it's *extremely* late in the release cycle!
All my best, Ryan
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 6:50 PM Alexey Romanenko
<ar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Is it still possible to cherry-pick this fix [1][2] since it’s a recent regression that touches pipelines in production?
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15616
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12628
>
> On 28 Sep 2021, at 03:31, Udi Meiri <ud...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I spoke too soon. We will be doing an rc2
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 1:29 PM Udi Meiri <ud...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release.
>>
>> There are 8 approving votes, 4 of which are binding:
>> * Ahmet Altay
>> * Alexey Romanenko
>> * Robert Bradshaw
>> * Chamikara Jayalath
>>
>> There are no disapproving votes.
>>
>> Thanks everyone!
>>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release 2.33.0, release candidate #1
Posted by Alexey Romanenko <ar...@gmail.com>.
Is it still possible to cherry-pick this fix [1][2] since it’s a recent regression that touches pipelines in production?
[1] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15616
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12628
> On 28 Sep 2021, at 03:31, Udi Meiri <ud...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I spoke too soon. We will be doing an rc2
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 1:29 PM Udi Meiri <udim@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release.
>
> There are 8 approving votes, 4 of which are binding:
> * Ahmet Altay
> * Alexey Romanenko
> * Robert Bradshaw
> * Chamikara Jayalath
>
> There are no disapproving votes.
>
> Thanks everyone!
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release 2.33.0, release candidate #1
Posted by Udi Meiri <ud...@apache.org>.
I spoke too soon. We will be doing an rc2
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 1:29 PM Udi Meiri <ud...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release.
>
> There are 8 approving votes, 4 of which are binding:
> * Ahmet Altay
> * Alexey Romanenko
> * Robert Bradshaw
> * Chamikara Jayalath
>
> There are no disapproving votes.
>
> Thanks everyone!
>
>