You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to reviews@spark.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/06/13 07:23:35 UTC

[GitHub] [spark] iRakson edited a comment on pull request #28752: [SPARK-31642][FOLLOWUP] Fix Sorting for duration column and make Status column sortable

iRakson edited a comment on pull request #28752:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28752#issuecomment-643583639


   > LGTM. Do you all have an opinion on back porting to branch-3.0? I think I would.
   > Yeah, it would be better. What do you think @iRakson ?
   
   Just to be clear, We are talking about back porting pagination support or fixing this sorting issue ?
   
   If we are only fixing this sorting issue then implementation will be slightly different as we are using `listingTable` for generating table.
   Either way it would be good to fix this.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org