Roadmap for official Apache Hama 1.0

["Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>]

Hi all,

I think we've now reached a level of 1.0 version. After fixing some
known bugs, I propose that we prepare the official Apache Hama 1.0
next release.

What do you think?

-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon

Re: Roadmap for official Apache Hama 1.0

["Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>]

Hi,

I generally agree with you. I can working on test stability and
scalability on mesos, yarn, and classic distributed cluster for a
while so it's not big issue but I’m not sure about APIs, especially
programming and job configuration APIs. These are.. maybe we need to
have some logical discussions. The pluggable interface, such as sync
service and messenger service are looks good to me.


On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Tommaso Teofili
<to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm generally +1 but I'd like to get some numbers on how much stable both
> platform and APIs really are.
>
> For the APIs I think we should expose package-info information and package
> level versioning (e.g. semantic versioning) in order to avoid backward
> compatibility issues. That implies that we want to significantly change an
> API it'd be good to do it before 1.0, afterwards it'd be a bit annoying.
> For the platform it'd be good if we could have a more strong testing also
> of distributed and pseudo distributed modes... not sure if we can achieve
> it via recent work on deploying Hama in containers and the likes...
>
> Just my 2 cents,
> Tommaso
>
> 2015-09-11 4:57 GMT+02:00 JongYoon Lim <se...@gmail.com>:
>
>> +1
>>
>> 2015년 9월 11일 금요일, Edward J. Yoon<ed...@apache.org>님이 작성한 메시지:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I think we've now reached a level of 1.0 version. After fixing some
>> > known bugs, I propose that we prepare the official Apache Hama 1.0
>> > next release.
>> >
>> > What do you think?
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> >
>>



-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon

Re: Roadmap for official Apache Hama 1.0

[Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>]

I'm generally +1 but I'd like to get some numbers on how much stable both
platform and APIs really are.

For the APIs I think we should expose package-info information and package
level versioning (e.g. semantic versioning) in order to avoid backward
compatibility issues. That implies that we want to significantly change an
API it'd be good to do it before 1.0, afterwards it'd be a bit annoying.
For the platform it'd be good if we could have a more strong testing also
of distributed and pseudo distributed modes... not sure if we can achieve
it via recent work on deploying Hama in containers and the likes...

Just my 2 cents,
Tommaso

2015-09-11 4:57 GMT+02:00 JongYoon Lim <se...@gmail.com>:

> +1
>
> 2015년 9월 11일 금요일, Edward J. Yoon<ed...@apache.org>님이 작성한 메시지:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I think we've now reached a level of 1.0 version. After fixing some
> > known bugs, I propose that we prepare the official Apache Hama 1.0
> > next release.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> >
>

Re: Roadmap for official Apache Hama 1.0

[JongYoon Lim <se...@gmail.com>]

+1

2015년 9월 11일 금요일, Edward J. Yoon<ed...@apache.org>님이 작성한 메시지:

> Hi all,
>
> I think we've now reached a level of 1.0 version. After fixing some
> known bugs, I propose that we prepare the official Apache Hama 1.0
> next release.
>
> What do you think?
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>