You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@phoenix.apache.org by "Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/11/02 05:45:59 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2890) Extend IndexTool to allow incremental index rebuilds

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15627832#comment-15627832 ] 

Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla commented on PHOENIX-2890:
--------------------------------------------------

[~jamestaylor] Ankit on vacation. I will submit rebased patch.

> Extend IndexTool to allow incremental index rebuilds
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-2890
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2890
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ankit Singhal
>            Assignee: Ankit Singhal
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 4.10.0
>
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-2890.patch, PHOENIX-2890_wip.patch
>
>
> Currently , IndexTool is used for initial index rebuild but I think we should extend it to be used for recovering index from last disabled timestamp too. 
> In general terms if we run IndexTool on already existing/new index, then it should follow the same semantics as followed by background Index rebuilding thread.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)