You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Michael Dürig (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/10/30 14:48:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6883) The compaction estimator should take
the compaction type (tail vs. full) into consideration
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Michael Dürig updated OAK-6883:
-------------------------------
Description:
Currently the compaction estimator unconditionally looks at the growth of the repository since the last compaction run. This turn out to be not optimal when interleaving tail and full compaction. It would be better to have the estimator look at the growth of the repository since last full compaction when running full compaction.
cc [~frm]
was:Currently the compaction estimator unconditionally looks at the growth of the repository since the last compaction run. This turn out to be not optimal when interleaving tail and full compaction. It would be better to have the estimator look at the growth of the repository since last full compaction when running full compaction.
> The compaction estimator should take the compaction type (tail vs. full) into consideration
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-6883
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6883
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: segment-tar
> Reporter: Michael Dürig
> Assignee: Francesco Mari
> Labels: compaction, gc
> Fix For: 1.8, 1.7.11
>
>
> Currently the compaction estimator unconditionally looks at the growth of the repository since the last compaction run. This turn out to be not optimal when interleaving tail and full compaction. It would be better to have the estimator look at the growth of the repository since last full compaction when running full compaction.
> cc [~frm]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)