You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to bugs@httpd.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2003/03/02 02:48:36 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17568] New: -
virtual host documentation
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17568>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17568
virtual host documentation
Summary: virtual host documentation
Product: Apache httpd-2.0
Version: 2.0.44
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: Blocker
Priority: Other
Component: Core
AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org
ReportedBy: mnhenein@hotmail.com
I spent 2 days trying to set up a virtual host. I followed the documentation
and set up the first container to represent the main site in section 2 of the
configuration file. I then set up a new one in a container following the first.
It did not work. I finally changed the orderof the containers and it worked.
This is directly opposite to what the documentation tells us to do. In case
you did not understand my newbie explaination more details will follow.
I originally set up my site palmplanet.net. This is the first and "main" site.
I then registered another site colonsurgeon.com. I tried to set this up as a
virtual host. I created a container for palmplanet.net followed by a container
for colonsurgeon.com. As a last ditch I changed the order of the two containers
and it worked. Is this a server bug or a documentation glitch? Thank you for
your time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org