You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@lucenenet.apache.org by George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net> on 2009/10/08 04:02:17 UTC
RE: Port of Java Lucene 2.9 is under way
I'm working on it. It will be another week or so before I have an alpha or
beta release. This is talking me longer than previous ports due to 1)
considerable new files are added, 2) a good deal of refactoring was
introduced in 2.9.
I wish I can divide the work of the initial port, and ask the community for
help, but that's just not possible due to the way initial ports are done.
-- George
-----Original Message-----
From: Artem Chereisky [mailto:a.chereisky@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 8:57 AM
To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Port of Java Lucene 2.9 is under way
Hi guys,
where can I find the early release of 2.9 port? Is it going to be under
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/?
Regards,
Art
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:32 PM, George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
>
> This is to let you know that I have begun the porting process of Java
> Lucene
> 2.9 to Lucene.Net. I hope in few weeks (maybe even next week) to have an
> early release checked-into SVN.
>
>
>
> If you are following Java Lucene mailing list, you will know that 2.9 is
> currently undergoing release as Release Candidate 4 and RC5 is expected (a
> bug was found in RC4). My port is based on RC3, but changes between Java
> Lucene 2.9 RC3 and soon to come RC5 aren't major to side track my port.
>
>
>
> With 2.9 release, we should be able to keep Java Lucene and Lucene.Net
> releases very close; my hope is, any further ports should be an
> accumulation
> of Java Lucene SVN commits ports vs. waiting for a new release to do a
> chunk
> release. I'm not sure if this goal can be achieved, but we will see.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> -- George
>
>
Re: Port of Java Lucene 2.9 is under way
Posted by Shashi Kant <sh...@gmail.com>.
This too has come up previously - we really need more contributors
(committers) to Lucene.net.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Matt Honeycutt <mb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> the point where we can stay on top of the porting manually.
>
RE: Port of Java Lucene 2.9 is under way
Posted by George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net>.
That's the goal. After this port, we should be able to grab SVN commits
into Java Lucene and port only those commits over. Then, the port will be
open to everyone.
-- George
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Honeycutt [mailto:mbhoneycutt@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 10:36 PM
To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Port of Java Lucene 2.9 is under way
Ouch, that still sounds pretty un-fun. Maybe one day this project will hit
the point where we can stay on top of the porting manually.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:24 PM, George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net> wrote:
> This question has came up in the past. You can search the mailing list
for
> my answers. Here is one,
>
>
http://markmail.org/search/?q=jlca#query:jlca%20from%3A%22George%20Aroush%22
>
+page:1+mid:3wylgpsujl2eyic7+state:results<http://markmail.org/search/?q=jlc
a#query:jlca%20from%3A%22George%20Aroush%22%0A+page:1+mid:3wylgpsujl2eyic7+s
tate:results> and another,
> http://markmail.org/message/i2efusv256ay5oxr.
>
> No, I will never do copy / past / build / test / etc. JLCA, scripts that
I
> wrote, and deltas are my best friends for porting (free time is not).
>
> -- George
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Honeycutt [mailto:mbhoneycutt@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 10:09 PM
> To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Port of Java Lucene 2.9 is under way
>
> This may be an ignorant question, but what does the porting process
> involve? My limited experience with porting Java to .NET was porting the
> Weka COBWEB clustering algorithm. My approach there was very brute-force,
> copy-paste, fix errors, build-and-test, and repeat. I hope there's a
> better way of doing things when dealing with a large port like this. :)
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:02 PM, George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net> wrote:
>
> > I'm working on it. It will be another week or so before I have an alpha
> or
> > beta release. This is talking me longer than previous ports due to 1)
> > considerable new files are added, 2) a good deal of refactoring was
> > introduced in 2.9.
> >
> > I wish I can divide the work of the initial port, and ask the community
> for
> > help, but that's just not possible due to the way initial ports are
done.
> >
> > -- George
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Artem Chereisky [mailto:a.chereisky@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 8:57 AM
> > To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Port of Java Lucene 2.9 is under way
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > where can I find the early release of 2.9 port? Is it going to be under
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Art
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:32 PM, George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This is to let you know that I have begun the porting process of Java
> > > Lucene
> > > 2.9 to Lucene.Net. I hope in few weeks (maybe even next week) to have
> an
> > > early release checked-into SVN.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > If you are following Java Lucene mailing list, you will know that 2.9
> is
> > > currently undergoing release as Release Candidate 4 and RC5 is
expected
> > (a
> > > bug was found in RC4). My port is based on RC3, but changes between
> Java
> > > Lucene 2.9 RC3 and soon to come RC5 aren't major to side track my
port.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > With 2.9 release, we should be able to keep Java Lucene and Lucene.Net
> > > releases very close; my hope is, any further ports should be an
> > > accumulation
> > > of Java Lucene SVN commits ports vs. waiting for a new release to do a
> > > chunk
> > > release. I'm not sure if this goal can be achieved, but we will see.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -- George
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: Port of Java Lucene 2.9 is under way
Posted by Matt Honeycutt <mb...@gmail.com>.
Ouch, that still sounds pretty un-fun. Maybe one day this project will hit
the point where we can stay on top of the porting manually.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:24 PM, George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net> wrote:
> This question has came up in the past. You can search the mailing list for
> my answers. Here is one,
>
> http://markmail.org/search/?q=jlca#query:jlca%20from%3A%22George%20Aroush%22
> +page:1+mid:3wylgpsujl2eyic7+state:results<http://markmail.org/search/?q=jlca#query:jlca%20from%3A%22George%20Aroush%22%0A+page:1+mid:3wylgpsujl2eyic7+state:results> and another,
> http://markmail.org/message/i2efusv256ay5oxr.
>
> No, I will never do copy / past / build / test / etc. JLCA, scripts that I
> wrote, and deltas are my best friends for porting (free time is not).
>
> -- George
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Honeycutt [mailto:mbhoneycutt@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 10:09 PM
> To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Port of Java Lucene 2.9 is under way
>
> This may be an ignorant question, but what does the porting process
> involve? My limited experience with porting Java to .NET was porting the
> Weka COBWEB clustering algorithm. My approach there was very brute-force,
> copy-paste, fix errors, build-and-test, and repeat. I hope there's a
> better way of doing things when dealing with a large port like this. :)
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:02 PM, George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net> wrote:
>
> > I'm working on it. It will be another week or so before I have an alpha
> or
> > beta release. This is talking me longer than previous ports due to 1)
> > considerable new files are added, 2) a good deal of refactoring was
> > introduced in 2.9.
> >
> > I wish I can divide the work of the initial port, and ask the community
> for
> > help, but that's just not possible due to the way initial ports are done.
> >
> > -- George
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Artem Chereisky [mailto:a.chereisky@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 8:57 AM
> > To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Port of Java Lucene 2.9 is under way
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > where can I find the early release of 2.9 port? Is it going to be under
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Art
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:32 PM, George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This is to let you know that I have begun the porting process of Java
> > > Lucene
> > > 2.9 to Lucene.Net. I hope in few weeks (maybe even next week) to have
> an
> > > early release checked-into SVN.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > If you are following Java Lucene mailing list, you will know that 2.9
> is
> > > currently undergoing release as Release Candidate 4 and RC5 is expected
> > (a
> > > bug was found in RC4). My port is based on RC3, but changes between
> Java
> > > Lucene 2.9 RC3 and soon to come RC5 aren't major to side track my port.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > With 2.9 release, we should be able to keep Java Lucene and Lucene.Net
> > > releases very close; my hope is, any further ports should be an
> > > accumulation
> > > of Java Lucene SVN commits ports vs. waiting for a new release to do a
> > > chunk
> > > release. I'm not sure if this goal can be achieved, but we will see.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -- George
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
RE: Port of Java Lucene 2.9 is under way
Posted by George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net>.
This question has came up in the past. You can search the mailing list for
my answers. Here is one,
http://markmail.org/search/?q=jlca#query:jlca%20from%3A%22George%20Aroush%22
+page:1+mid:3wylgpsujl2eyic7+state:results and another,
http://markmail.org/message/i2efusv256ay5oxr.
No, I will never do copy / past / build / test / etc. JLCA, scripts that I
wrote, and deltas are my best friends for porting (free time is not).
-- George
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Honeycutt [mailto:mbhoneycutt@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 10:09 PM
To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Port of Java Lucene 2.9 is under way
This may be an ignorant question, but what does the porting process
involve? My limited experience with porting Java to .NET was porting the
Weka COBWEB clustering algorithm. My approach there was very brute-force,
copy-paste, fix errors, build-and-test, and repeat. I hope there's a
better way of doing things when dealing with a large port like this. :)
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:02 PM, George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net> wrote:
> I'm working on it. It will be another week or so before I have an alpha
or
> beta release. This is talking me longer than previous ports due to 1)
> considerable new files are added, 2) a good deal of refactoring was
> introduced in 2.9.
>
> I wish I can divide the work of the initial port, and ask the community
for
> help, but that's just not possible due to the way initial ports are done.
>
> -- George
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Artem Chereisky [mailto:a.chereisky@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 8:57 AM
> To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Port of Java Lucene 2.9 is under way
>
> Hi guys,
>
> where can I find the early release of 2.9 port? Is it going to be under
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/?
>
> Regards,
> Art
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:32 PM, George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> >
> >
> > This is to let you know that I have begun the porting process of Java
> > Lucene
> > 2.9 to Lucene.Net. I hope in few weeks (maybe even next week) to have
an
> > early release checked-into SVN.
> >
> >
> >
> > If you are following Java Lucene mailing list, you will know that 2.9 is
> > currently undergoing release as Release Candidate 4 and RC5 is expected
> (a
> > bug was found in RC4). My port is based on RC3, but changes between
Java
> > Lucene 2.9 RC3 and soon to come RC5 aren't major to side track my port.
> >
> >
> >
> > With 2.9 release, we should be able to keep Java Lucene and Lucene.Net
> > releases very close; my hope is, any further ports should be an
> > accumulation
> > of Java Lucene SVN commits ports vs. waiting for a new release to do a
> > chunk
> > release. I'm not sure if this goal can be achieved, but we will see.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > -- George
> >
> >
>
>
Re: Port of Java Lucene 2.9 is under way
Posted by Matt Honeycutt <mb...@gmail.com>.
This may be an ignorant question, but what does the porting process
involve? My limited experience with porting Java to .NET was porting the
Weka COBWEB clustering algorithm. My approach there was very brute-force,
copy-paste, fix errors, build-and-test, and repeat. I hope there's a
better way of doing things when dealing with a large port like this. :)
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:02 PM, George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net> wrote:
> I'm working on it. It will be another week or so before I have an alpha or
> beta release. This is talking me longer than previous ports due to 1)
> considerable new files are added, 2) a good deal of refactoring was
> introduced in 2.9.
>
> I wish I can divide the work of the initial port, and ask the community for
> help, but that's just not possible due to the way initial ports are done.
>
> -- George
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Artem Chereisky [mailto:a.chereisky@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 8:57 AM
> To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Port of Java Lucene 2.9 is under way
>
> Hi guys,
>
> where can I find the early release of 2.9 port? Is it going to be under
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/?
>
> Regards,
> Art
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:32 PM, George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> >
> >
> > This is to let you know that I have begun the porting process of Java
> > Lucene
> > 2.9 to Lucene.Net. I hope in few weeks (maybe even next week) to have an
> > early release checked-into SVN.
> >
> >
> >
> > If you are following Java Lucene mailing list, you will know that 2.9 is
> > currently undergoing release as Release Candidate 4 and RC5 is expected
> (a
> > bug was found in RC4). My port is based on RC3, but changes between Java
> > Lucene 2.9 RC3 and soon to come RC5 aren't major to side track my port.
> >
> >
> >
> > With 2.9 release, we should be able to keep Java Lucene and Lucene.Net
> > releases very close; my hope is, any further ports should be an
> > accumulation
> > of Java Lucene SVN commits ports vs. waiting for a new release to do a
> > chunk
> > release. I'm not sure if this goal can be achieved, but we will see.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > -- George
> >
> >
>
>