You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Francois Meillet <fr...@gmail.com> on 2016/04/05 18:33:49 UTC
Java Framework Comparison Matrix
Have you seen the https://vaadin.com/comparison ?
François
Re: Java Framework Comparison Matrix
Posted by Tobias Soloschenko <to...@googlemail.com>.
LOL - the "Ready made extensions" link is directing to a sourceforge location mentioning Wicket 1.2 ...... why not Wicketstuff?
kind regards
Tobias
> Am 06.04.2016 um 12:07 schrieb Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Alejandro Duarte was so kind and updated the matrix with some facts based on my comments.
> Some star ratings ('web technology abstractions', '#widgets') are still way off, but alas, these are opinions.
>
> Have fun
> Sven
>
>
>> On 05.04.2016 21:11, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
>> not to mention the missing mark in the "Built for dynamic web pages" row....to me this comparison is just (bad) marketing.
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I do not like such comparisons.
>>>
>>> Beside that:
>>>
>>> Wicket has Websocket Support
>>> Wicket has Spring Integration
>>>
>>> kind regards
>>>
>>> Tobias
>>>
>>>> Am 05.04.2016 um 18:33 schrieb Francois Meillet <fr...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> Have you seen the https://vaadin.com/comparison ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> François
>
Re: Java Framework Comparison Matrix
Posted by Tobias Soloschenko <to...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Sven,
thanks for the effort! There is another topic which is wrong - Wicket also supports Portlets. There was a fix @ Wicketstuff to make the portlet bridge running on WPS 8.5 / Liferay.
If you count wicket-bootstrap as Wicket you also can say that there are default themes.
A lot of components are in wicketstuff mentioned not being included in Wicket in that matrix.
A lot of checks - the browsers at the end of this matrix can be considered to be supported....
Oohhhhh dear....
kind regards
Tobias
> Am 06.04.2016 um 12:07 schrieb Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Alejandro Duarte was so kind and updated the matrix with some facts based on my comments.
> Some star ratings ('web technology abstractions', '#widgets') are still way off, but alas, these are opinions.
>
> Have fun
> Sven
>
>
>> On 05.04.2016 21:11, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
>> not to mention the missing mark in the "Built for dynamic web pages" row....to me this comparison is just (bad) marketing.
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I do not like such comparisons.
>>>
>>> Beside that:
>>>
>>> Wicket has Websocket Support
>>> Wicket has Spring Integration
>>>
>>> kind regards
>>>
>>> Tobias
>>>
>>>> Am 05.04.2016 um 18:33 schrieb Francois Meillet <fr...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> Have you seen the https://vaadin.com/comparison ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> François
>
Re: Java Framework Comparison Matrix
Posted by Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>.
Hi all,
Alejandro Duarte was so kind and updated the matrix with some facts
based on my comments.
Some star ratings ('web technology abstractions', '#widgets') are still
way off, but alas, these are opinions.
Have fun
Sven
On 05.04.2016 21:11, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
> not to mention the missing mark in the "Built for dynamic web pages"
> row....to me this comparison is just (bad) marketing.
>> Hi,
>>
>> I do not like such comparisons.
>>
>> Beside that:
>>
>> Wicket has Websocket Support
>> Wicket has Spring Integration
>>
>> kind regards
>>
>> Tobias
>>
>>> Am 05.04.2016 um 18:33 schrieb Francois Meillet
>>> <fr...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Have you seen the https://vaadin.com/comparison ?
>>>
>>>
>>> François
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Re: Java Framework Comparison Matrix
Posted by Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>.
not to mention the missing mark in the "Built for dynamic web pages"
row....to me this comparison is just (bad) marketing.
> Hi,
>
> I do not like such comparisons.
>
> Beside that:
>
> Wicket has Websocket Support
> Wicket has Spring Integration
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
>> Am 05.04.2016 um 18:33 schrieb Francois Meillet <fr...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Have you seen the https://vaadin.com/comparison ?
>>
>>
>> François
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: Java Framework Comparison Matrix
Posted by Tobias Soloschenko <to...@googlemail.com>.
Hi,
I do not like such comparisons.
Beside that:
Wicket has Websocket Support
Wicket has Spring Integration
kind regards
Tobias
> Am 05.04.2016 um 18:33 schrieb Francois Meillet <fr...@gmail.com>:
>
> Have you seen the https://vaadin.com/comparison ?
>
>
> François
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: Java Framework Comparison Matrix
Posted by Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>.
Yes of course! it's printed on my toilet paper :).
On 5 Apr 2016 18:34, "Francois Meillet" <fr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Have you seen the https://vaadin.com/comparison ?
>
>
> François
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>