You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mahout.apache.org by "Jake Mannix (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/10/12 21:13:31 UTC

[jira] Updated: (MAHOUT-181) DistanceMeasure is broken: iteration is done over nonZeroElements of v1.plus(v2), not v1.minus(v2)

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Jake Mannix updated MAHOUT-181:
-------------------------------

    Attachment: MAHOUT-181-with-TanimotoFix.patch

Updated patch, which applies cleanly to trunk (r823926), and includes a fix for the TanimotoDistanceMeasure, which was broken.  Unit tests all pass.

> DistanceMeasure is broken: iteration is done over nonZeroElements of v1.plus(v2), not v1.minus(v2)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAHOUT-181
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-181
>             Project: Mahout
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Matrix
>    Affects Versions: 0.2
>         Environment: all
>            Reporter: Jake Mannix
>            Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
>             Fix For: 0.2
>
>         Attachments: MAHOUT-181-with-TanimotoFix.patch, MAHOUT-181.patch
>
>
> SquaredEuclideanDistanceMeasure iterates over v1.plus(v2), which has the right number of nonzero elements if v1.get(i) != -v2.get(i) for all i indexing nonzero elements, but for example, the simple case of looking at SquaredEuclideanDisanceMeasure.distance(v, v.assign(new NegateFunction())) yeilds zero on current trunk, instead of 4*v.lengthSquared().
> Attached is a patch with a unit test which checks that DistanceMeasure.distance always returns nonnegative results and in particular also does not return , as well as a fix for ManhattanDistanceMeasure, SquaredEuclideanDistanceMeasure, and EuclideanDistanceMeasure.
> Unfortunately, the attached unit test reveals that the TanimotoDistanceMeasure is more broken than I can fix at present.  It doesn't appear to be properly using the referenced formula in wikipedia, and in fact sometimes returns negative results.  This means that with this patch applied, TestTanimotoDistanceMeasure is failing (and rightfully so).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.