You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geode.apache.org by Alberto Bustamante Reyes <al...@est.tech> on 2020/07/07 09:21:53 UTC
about Liberica JDK
Hi devs,
I have seen in develop branch this commit that changes openjdk by Liberica JDK ( https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/5312 ), although it was reverted later so I suppose there are still issues to be solved.
I didn't know Liberica and I'm curious about the change. Why is this change being implemented?
BR/
Alberto B.
Re: about Liberica JDK
Posted by Jacob Barrett <ja...@vmware.com>.
> On Jul 8, 2020, at 10:25 AM, Robert Houghton <rh...@vmware.com> wrote:
>
> Only partially tongue-in-cheek, but isn’t the promise of the JDK, that it is the same everywhere, on all versions, builds, and platforms?
No, only the JRE.
-Jake
Re: about Liberica JDK
Posted by Robert Houghton <rh...@vmware.com>.
Only partially tongue-in-cheek, but isn’t the promise of the JDK, that it is the same everywhere, on all versions, builds, and platforms?
From: Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>
Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 10:23 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org <de...@geode.apache.org>
Subject: Re: about Liberica JDK
In the future, I think we should discuss and propose changing the JDK on
this dev-list before making the changes.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 9:01 AM Anthony Baker <ba...@vmware.com> wrote:
> Liberica is an OpenJDK distribution like AdoptOpenJDK, Oracle, RedHat,
> Amazon, Azul, etc. I have yet to find a behavioral difference between the
> distributions—it’s mostly about ease of acquiring binaries and LTS support.
> Just for simplicity I would prefer to use a single JDK distribution across
> versions in our CI pipelines.
>
>
> Anthony
>
>
> > On Jul 7, 2020, at 2:21 AM, Alberto Bustamante Reyes
> <al...@est.tech> wrote:
> >
> > Hi devs,
> >
> > I have seen in develop branch this commit that changes openjdk by
> Liberica JDK (
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fgeode%2Fpull%2F5312&data=02%7C01%7Crhoughton%40vmware.com%7C3b7d69b430bc4bd4faf408d823639d41%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637298258028125419&sdata=SH3ASp6W1EjfWUccN5ssm1EmNihh9T8FK%2F1NsHxmS7k%3D&reserved=0
> ), although it was reverted later so I suppose there are still issues to be
> solved.
> >
> > I didn't know Liberica and I'm curious about the change. Why is this
> change being implemented?
> >
> > BR/
> >
> > Alberto B.
> >
>
>
Re: about Liberica JDK
Posted by Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>.
In the future, I think we should discuss and propose changing the JDK on
this dev-list before making the changes.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 9:01 AM Anthony Baker <ba...@vmware.com> wrote:
> Liberica is an OpenJDK distribution like AdoptOpenJDK, Oracle, RedHat,
> Amazon, Azul, etc. I have yet to find a behavioral difference between the
> distributions—it’s mostly about ease of acquiring binaries and LTS support.
> Just for simplicity I would prefer to use a single JDK distribution across
> versions in our CI pipelines.
>
>
> Anthony
>
>
> > On Jul 7, 2020, at 2:21 AM, Alberto Bustamante Reyes
> <al...@est.tech> wrote:
> >
> > Hi devs,
> >
> > I have seen in develop branch this commit that changes openjdk by
> Liberica JDK (
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fgeode%2Fpull%2F5312&data=02%7C01%7Cbakera%40vmware.com%7C92aa27c47a164abdd6b808d822573a33%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637297105319626477&sdata=X3V4jcQ7DWEVtJuUaXOQy%2F0l3xri9g4a0%2BfflLmui1g%3D&reserved=0
> ), although it was reverted later so I suppose there are still issues to be
> solved.
> >
> > I didn't know Liberica and I'm curious about the change. Why is this
> change being implemented?
> >
> > BR/
> >
> > Alberto B.
> >
>
>
Re: about Liberica JDK
Posted by Anthony Baker <ba...@vmware.com>.
Liberica is an OpenJDK distribution like AdoptOpenJDK, Oracle, RedHat, Amazon, Azul, etc. I have yet to find a behavioral difference between the distributions—it’s mostly about ease of acquiring binaries and LTS support. Just for simplicity I would prefer to use a single JDK distribution across versions in our CI pipelines.
Anthony
> On Jul 7, 2020, at 2:21 AM, Alberto Bustamante Reyes <al...@est.tech> wrote:
>
> Hi devs,
>
> I have seen in develop branch this commit that changes openjdk by Liberica JDK ( https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fgeode%2Fpull%2F5312&data=02%7C01%7Cbakera%40vmware.com%7C92aa27c47a164abdd6b808d822573a33%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637297105319626477&sdata=X3V4jcQ7DWEVtJuUaXOQy%2F0l3xri9g4a0%2BfflLmui1g%3D&reserved=0 ), although it was reverted later so I suppose there are still issues to be solved.
>
> I didn't know Liberica and I'm curious about the change. Why is this change being implemented?
>
> BR/
>
> Alberto B.
>