SA 304/spamc milter question

[Dr Robert Young <rc...@aliconsultants.com>]

We want to do some testing of our email system with, and without, SA  
intercepting the mails. Currently, we have SA 304 installed and  
running with sendmail, using the milter-spamc "hook".

I just want to verify that if one manually "shuts down" the spamd  
daemon, that the emails would be eventually "passed" along as  
"unchecked" email after any appropriate "timeouts" are encountered ?

I basically want to avoid having to recompile sendmail to remove the  
"milter" lines currently in the system. 

Re: SA 304/spamc milter question

[Jay Lee <jl...@pbu.edu>]

Dr Robert Young wrote:
> We want to do some testing of our email system with, and without, SA  
> intercepting the mails. Currently, we have SA 304 installed and  running 
> with sendmail, using the milter-spamc "hook".
> 
> I just want to verify that if one manually "shuts down" the spamd  
> daemon, that the emails would be eventually "passed" along as  
> "unchecked" email after any appropriate "timeouts" are encountered ?
> 
> I basically want to avoid having to recompile sendmail to remove the  
> "milter" lines currently in the system.

I'm not sure where you question is.  To test this out, disable spamd...

Jay
-- 
Jay Lee
Network / Systems Administrator
Information Technology Dept.
Philadelphia Biblical University
--