You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@onami.apache.org by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org> on 2012/11/26 14:17:59 UTC
announcing Apache Onami on Guice ML
Hi all guys,
I think times are, more or less, mature to announche to Guice ML that
an ASF community is working on Guice 3rd parties, purposes are:
* let Guice community that extensions could have just one single
entry point where looking for integrations;
* recruit components developers: Guice is surrounded by a lot of
talented guys who wrote excellent piece of software, sometimes they
just published their software on their blog and never released... I
think it would be good for the whole community, under both dev/user
perspective, if such people would join.
WDYT?
TIA,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
Re: announcing Apache Onami on Guice ML
Posted by Daniel Manzke <da...@googlemail.com>.
+1
Von meinem iPad gesendet
Am 26.11.2012 um 14:44 schrieb Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>:
> Great, thanks a lot Stuart! :)
>
> best,
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Stuart McCulloch <mc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 26 Nov 2012, at 13:17, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all guys,
>>>
>>> I think times are, more or less, mature to announche to Guice ML that
>>> an ASF community is working on Guice 3rd parties, purposes are:
>>>
>>> * let Guice community that extensions could have just one single
>>> entry point where looking for integrations;
>>>
>>> * recruit components developers: Guice is surrounded by a lot of
>>> talented guys who wrote excellent piece of software, sometimes they
>>> just published their software on their blog and never released... I
>>> think it would be good for the whole community, under both dev/user
>>> perspective, if such people would join.
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>
>> Sounds reasonable to me, I've added a comment to http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/3rdPartyModules (I'll go through and update the wiki page later this week to reflect all the comments)
>>
>>> TIA,
>>> -Simo
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
Re: announcing Apache Onami on Guice ML
Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>.
Great, thanks a lot Stuart! :)
best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Stuart McCulloch <mc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 26 Nov 2012, at 13:17, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>
>> Hi all guys,
>>
>> I think times are, more or less, mature to announche to Guice ML that
>> an ASF community is working on Guice 3rd parties, purposes are:
>>
>> * let Guice community that extensions could have just one single
>> entry point where looking for integrations;
>>
>> * recruit components developers: Guice is surrounded by a lot of
>> talented guys who wrote excellent piece of software, sometimes they
>> just published their software on their blog and never released... I
>> think it would be good for the whole community, under both dev/user
>> perspective, if such people would join.
>>
>> WDYT?
>
> Sounds reasonable to me, I've added a comment to http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/3rdPartyModules (I'll go through and update the wiki page later this week to reflect all the comments)
>
>> TIA,
>> -Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>
Re: announcing Apache Onami on Guice ML
Posted by Stuart McCulloch <mc...@gmail.com>.
On 26 Nov 2012, at 13:17, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
>
> I think times are, more or less, mature to announche to Guice ML that
> an ASF community is working on Guice 3rd parties, purposes are:
>
> * let Guice community that extensions could have just one single
> entry point where looking for integrations;
>
> * recruit components developers: Guice is surrounded by a lot of
> talented guys who wrote excellent piece of software, sometimes they
> just published their software on their blog and never released... I
> think it would be good for the whole community, under both dev/user
> perspective, if such people would join.
>
> WDYT?
Sounds reasonable to me, I've added a comment to http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/3rdPartyModules (I'll go through and update the wiki page later this week to reflect all the comments)
> TIA,
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/