You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to legal-discuss@apache.org by "Jan Lehnardt (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/08/19 08:45:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-319) Clarify the usage of ReactJS

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16134027#comment-16134027 ] 

Jan Lehnardt commented on LEGAL-319:
------------------------------------

it’s a no.

Official statement: https://code.facebook.com/posts/112130496157735/explaining-react-s-license/

GitHub Issue Comment: https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/10191#issuecomment-323486580

> Clarify the usage of ReactJS
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-319
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-319
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: John D. Ament
>
> ReactJS is another very popular library these days that is also licensed under Facebook BSD+Patents license.  Can:
> - Apache projects include the source in a release (my guess is no)?
> - Apache projects depend on it as a compile time dependency in their projects?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org