You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@fluo.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/07/30 21:49:34 UTC
[GitHub] [fluo-uno] ctubbsii opened a new pull request #250: Remove unneeded step for Hadoop 3.3 and later
ctubbsii opened a new pull request #250:
URL: https://github.com/apache/fluo-uno/pull/250
Prevent unnecessary javax.activation-api step for Hadoop 3.3 and later,
where it is already included in the Hadoop binary.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [fluo-uno] ctubbsii commented on pull request #250: Remove unneeded step for Hadoop 3.3 and later
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
ctubbsii commented on pull request #250:
URL: https://github.com/apache/fluo-uno/pull/250#issuecomment-666738110
I noticed this wasn't needed any longer (for 3.3 and later) while testing #249.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [fluo-uno] ctubbsii merged pull request #250: Remove unneeded step for Hadoop 3.3 and later
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
ctubbsii merged pull request #250:
URL: https://github.com/apache/fluo-uno/pull/250
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [fluo-uno] ctubbsii commented on pull request #250: Remove unneeded step for Hadoop 3.3 and later
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
ctubbsii commented on pull request #250:
URL: https://github.com/apache/fluo-uno/pull/250#issuecomment-668088504
> @ctubbsii do you know if a similar changes in needed in Muchos?
I'm not sure. I don't know enough about Ansible to know whether the step is already automatically skipped if the file already exists, or if the step is needed to be conditionally skipped there. It's probably not that important, though. It's a minor thing in Muchos' overhead.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [fluo-uno] keith-turner commented on pull request #250: Remove unneeded step for Hadoop 3.3 and later
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
keith-turner commented on pull request #250:
URL: https://github.com/apache/fluo-uno/pull/250#issuecomment-668084309
@ctubbsii do you know if a similar changes in needed in Muchos?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org