You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com> on 2012/02/05 20:28:26 UTC
Developing on a mac
I'm debugging some tests on my MBP running Lion. It seems that the Apple developer kit defines an incompatible definition of javax.annotation.Resource, e.g. it does not have a field lookup. How do people work around this problem?
Regards,
Alan
Re: Developing on a mac
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
i didn't edit the SDK,
when the compilation fails right clic on the test -> exclude and then all
is fine :)
- Romain
2012/2/5 Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> Yeah, I suposed we could edit the SDK in intellij but I, like you, simply
> removed the lookup field of the annotation of that test so that I could
> move on.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> On Feb 5, 2012, at 11:47 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
> > i think openejb uses it only for one test so personnally i ignore this
> test
> > and when i worked on it i was using maven to compile/run it.
> >
> > not sure if it is possible to ignore class in all IDEs (i use Idea).
> >
> > - Romain
> >
> >
> > 2012/2/5 Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> >
> >> Yeah, I was thinking that it was using the wrong versions.
> >>
> >> I generally know what it means to endorse a jar. Can you be more
> specific
> >> what it means in my case? Do all MBP developers need to do this to
> work on
> >> openejb?
> >>
> >> Happy to update the developer documentation with this info.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Alan
> >>
> >>
> >> On Feb 5, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> endorse your jdk.
> >>>
> >>> it is not linked to apple, it is the same under for everybody. It is a
> >>> difference between java6 and JEE6. The annotation is defined in
> >>> geronimo-annotation. The maven build and tomee are automatically
> >> endorsed.
> >>>
> >>> - Romain
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2012/2/5 Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> >>>
> >>>> I'm debugging some tests on my MBP running Lion. It seems that the
> >> Apple
> >>>> developer kit defines an incompatible definition of
> >>>> javax.annotation.Resource, e.g. it does not have a field lookup. How
> do
> >>>> people work around this problem?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Alan
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: Developing on a mac
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
Yeah, I suposed we could edit the SDK in intellij but I, like you, simply removed the lookup field of the annotation of that test so that I could move on.
Regards,
Alan
On Feb 5, 2012, at 11:47 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> i think openejb uses it only for one test so personnally i ignore this test
> and when i worked on it i was using maven to compile/run it.
>
> not sure if it is possible to ignore class in all IDEs (i use Idea).
>
> - Romain
>
>
> 2012/2/5 Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
>
>> Yeah, I was thinking that it was using the wrong versions.
>>
>> I generally know what it means to endorse a jar. Can you be more specific
>> what it means in my case? Do all MBP developers need to do this to work on
>> openejb?
>>
>> Happy to update the developer documentation with this info.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>>
>> On Feb 5, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> endorse your jdk.
>>>
>>> it is not linked to apple, it is the same under for everybody. It is a
>>> difference between java6 and JEE6. The annotation is defined in
>>> geronimo-annotation. The maven build and tomee are automatically
>> endorsed.
>>>
>>> - Romain
>>>
>>>
>>> 2012/2/5 Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
>>>
>>>> I'm debugging some tests on my MBP running Lion. It seems that the
>> Apple
>>>> developer kit defines an incompatible definition of
>>>> javax.annotation.Resource, e.g. it does not have a field lookup. How do
>>>> people work around this problem?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Alan
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: Developing on a mac
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
i think openejb uses it only for one test so personnally i ignore this test
and when i worked on it i was using maven to compile/run it.
not sure if it is possible to ignore class in all IDEs (i use Idea).
- Romain
2012/2/5 Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> Yeah, I was thinking that it was using the wrong versions.
>
> I generally know what it means to endorse a jar. Can you be more specific
> what it means in my case? Do all MBP developers need to do this to work on
> openejb?
>
> Happy to update the developer documentation with this info.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
> On Feb 5, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > endorse your jdk.
> >
> > it is not linked to apple, it is the same under for everybody. It is a
> > difference between java6 and JEE6. The annotation is defined in
> > geronimo-annotation. The maven build and tomee are automatically
> endorsed.
> >
> > - Romain
> >
> >
> > 2012/2/5 Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> >
> >> I'm debugging some tests on my MBP running Lion. It seems that the
> Apple
> >> developer kit defines an incompatible definition of
> >> javax.annotation.Resource, e.g. it does not have a field lookup. How do
> >> people work around this problem?
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Alan
> >>
>
>
Re: Developing on a mac
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
Yeah, I was thinking that it was using the wrong versions.
I generally know what it means to endorse a jar. Can you be more specific what it means in my case? Do all MBP developers need to do this to work on openejb?
Happy to update the developer documentation with this info.
Thanks!
Regards,
Alan
On Feb 5, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> endorse your jdk.
>
> it is not linked to apple, it is the same under for everybody. It is a
> difference between java6 and JEE6. The annotation is defined in
> geronimo-annotation. The maven build and tomee are automatically endorsed.
>
> - Romain
>
>
> 2012/2/5 Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
>
>> I'm debugging some tests on my MBP running Lion. It seems that the Apple
>> developer kit defines an incompatible definition of
>> javax.annotation.Resource, e.g. it does not have a field lookup. How do
>> people work around this problem?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
Re: Developing on a mac
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
endorse your jdk.
it is not linked to apple, it is the same under for everybody. It is a
difference between java6 and JEE6. The annotation is defined in
geronimo-annotation. The maven build and tomee are automatically endorsed.
- Romain
2012/2/5 Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> I'm debugging some tests on my MBP running Lion. It seems that the Apple
> developer kit defines an incompatible definition of
> javax.annotation.Resource, e.g. it does not have a field lookup. How do
> people work around this problem?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
Re: Developing on a mac
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
no issue for me,
was mainly a "working test" while we were working on TCKs.
- Romain
2012/2/5 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>
> On Feb 5, 2012, at 12:09 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> >
> > On Feb 5, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> >
> >> I'm debugging some tests on my MBP running Lion. It seems that the
> Apple developer kit defines an incompatible definition of
> javax.annotation.Resource, e.g. it does not have a field lookup. How do
> people work around this problem?
> >
> > I personally change my copy of that test to 'name' instead of 'lookup'
>
> We probably don't "need" that test considering there are several dozens
> like it in the TCK and we also have tests of our own that use the 'lookup'
> in JAXB form.
>
> One less roadblock for people to deal with when trying to contribute could
> be nice.
>
>
> -David
>
>
Re: Developing on a mac
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
On Feb 5, 2012, at 12:09 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Feb 5, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>> I'm debugging some tests on my MBP running Lion. It seems that the Apple developer kit defines an incompatible definition of javax.annotation.Resource, e.g. it does not have a field lookup. How do people work around this problem?
>
> I personally change my copy of that test to 'name' instead of 'lookup'
We probably don't "need" that test considering there are several dozens like it in the TCK and we also have tests of our own that use the 'lookup' in JAXB form.
One less roadblock for people to deal with when trying to contribute could be nice.
-David
Re: Developing on a mac
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
On Feb 5, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> I'm debugging some tests on my MBP running Lion. It seems that the Apple developer kit defines an incompatible definition of javax.annotation.Resource, e.g. it does not have a field lookup. How do people work around this problem?
I personally change my copy of that test to 'name' instead of 'lookup'
-David