You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@storm.apache.org by "P. Taylor Goetz" <pt...@gmail.com> on 2019/03/22 20:23:37 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC5
This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc5)
Full list of changes in this release:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/RELEASE_NOTES.html
The tag/commit to be voted upon is v2.0.0:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=7e0a711e4ed5315f04f9f726caff61e0f169e320;hb=b5823809bd4b438e789a36f163f318d4b161ad13
The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/apache-storm-2.0.0-src.tar.gz
Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/
The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1076
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0.
When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0
[ ] 0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
-Taylor
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC5
Posted by Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for clarifying Taylor.
If I understand it correctly, the L & N for source should only contain
licenses for source we include. So the L & N files we have now are probably
fine for this, as they contain licensing for the Javascript we have in UI,
and I don't believe we include other kinds of external source in the source
dist. I'll do a quick check that all the JS we have is covered.
For the binary distribution, we should have a L & N that is the L & N for
the source, plus any licenses for binaries we include (e.g. everything in
the /lib directory). We should update the L & N in storm-dist/binary, and
I'd also like to move them to the project root, e.g. as "LICENSE-binary". I
think they're a little well hidden right now.
I get the impression that the binary license should not include licenses
for e.g. dependencies downloaded when a topology uses `storm-hbase`, as
those binaries aren't part of the distribution. Is this right? Do those
kinds of dependencies still need to have their licenses listed somewhere
(e.g. in the autogenerated dependency-licenses file), or is this not
necessary?
Den tir. 26. mar. 2019 kl. 00.45 skrev P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>:
> L & N files usually differ between source and binary distributions.
> Usually due to shading, contents of lib directory, etc. Source
> distributions are simpler, since they can’t contain any binaries. For a
> binary distribution, the L & N files need to reflect everything in the
> binary dependencies.
>
> I think it’s important that we review licensing issues, so I’ll cancel
> this RC.
>
> Kudos to Stig for paying attention to license hygiene!
>
> -Taylor
>
> > On Mar 25, 2019, at 1:21 PM, Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Maybe something like this? https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2980
> >
> > Den man. 25. mar. 2019 kl. 14.12 skrev Stig Rohde Døssing <
> > stigdoessing@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> The ASF guideline says the file "should identify the third-party
> product,
> >> its licensing, and a url to the its homepage". If we can get away with
> >> including the license name and not the license text, I think
> >> THIRD-PARTY.txt contains what we need. E.g. Spark also only lists the
> >> license names, and not the texts.
> >>
> >> We can clean up the output a bit more, e.g. collapse all the Apache
> >> licenses together under one header, I just didn't bother because I
> didn't
> >> expect the file to be user facing.
> >>
> >> Den man. 25. mar. 2019 kl. 13.47 skrev Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan@gmail.com
> >:
> >>
> >>> According to how other projects are doing right now, looks like we are
> >>> not doing.
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/NOTICE-binary
> >>> https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/LICENSE-binary
> >>> https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/trunk/LICENSE
> >>>
> >>> If I understand correct, aether in storm-submit-tool is also EPL v1.0.
> >>>
> >>> Btw, I just ran the command "mvn generate-resources
> >>> -Dlicense.skipAggregateAddThirdParty=false" and see the output: the
> format
> >>> of output looks good though the output is a bit verbose. (Attached the
> >>> output file.)
> >>>
> >>> Would it be OK to include the file without cleaning up?
> >>>
> >>> 2019년 3월 25일 (월) 오후 8:19, Stig Rohde Døssing <stigdoessing@gmail.com
> >님이
> >>> 작성:
> >>>
> >>>> 0
> >>>>
> >>>> Built and ran tests from source zip.
> >>>> Ran ExclamationTopology on local install set up from binary zip.
> >>>> Verified no unexpected error logs.
> >>>> Ran integration test locally.
> >>>> Clicked around in UI for a bit, checked that logviewer works.
> >>>> Ran the license check plugin, and verified that all dependency
> licenses
> >>>> are
> >>>> either category A or B.
> >>>>
> >>>> We have some category B dependencies, e.g. JAXB and Jersey under CDDL.
> >>>>
> https://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#appropriately-labelled-condition
> >>>> mentions that we should list category B dependencies somewhere
> visible to
> >>>> users. Do we do this currently?
> >>>>
> >>>> Den fre. 22. mar. 2019 kl. 21.23 skrev P. Taylor Goetz <
> >>>> ptgoetz@gmail.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc5)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Full list of changes in this release:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/RELEASE_NOTES.html
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v2.0.0:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=7e0a711e4ed5315f04f9f726caff61e0f169e320;hb=b5823809bd4b438e789a36f163f318d4b161ad13
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/apache-storm-2.0.0-src.tar.gz
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1076
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0
> >>>>> [ ] 0 No opinion
> >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Taylor
> >>>>
> >>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC5
Posted by "P. Taylor Goetz" <pt...@gmail.com>.
L & N files usually differ between source and binary distributions. Usually due to shading, contents of lib directory, etc. Source distributions are simpler, since they can’t contain any binaries. For a binary distribution, the L & N files need to reflect everything in the binary dependencies.
I think it’s important that we review licensing issues, so I’ll cancel this RC.
Kudos to Stig for paying attention to license hygiene!
-Taylor
> On Mar 25, 2019, at 1:21 PM, Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Maybe something like this? https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2980
>
> Den man. 25. mar. 2019 kl. 14.12 skrev Stig Rohde Døssing <
> stigdoessing@gmail.com>:
>
>> The ASF guideline says the file "should identify the third-party product,
>> its licensing, and a url to the its homepage". If we can get away with
>> including the license name and not the license text, I think
>> THIRD-PARTY.txt contains what we need. E.g. Spark also only lists the
>> license names, and not the texts.
>>
>> We can clean up the output a bit more, e.g. collapse all the Apache
>> licenses together under one header, I just didn't bother because I didn't
>> expect the file to be user facing.
>>
>> Den man. 25. mar. 2019 kl. 13.47 skrev Jungtaek Lim <ka...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> According to how other projects are doing right now, looks like we are
>>> not doing.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/NOTICE-binary
>>> https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/LICENSE-binary
>>> https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/trunk/LICENSE
>>>
>>> If I understand correct, aether in storm-submit-tool is also EPL v1.0.
>>>
>>> Btw, I just ran the command "mvn generate-resources
>>> -Dlicense.skipAggregateAddThirdParty=false" and see the output: the format
>>> of output looks good though the output is a bit verbose. (Attached the
>>> output file.)
>>>
>>> Would it be OK to include the file without cleaning up?
>>>
>>> 2019년 3월 25일 (월) 오후 8:19, Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>님이
>>> 작성:
>>>
>>>> 0
>>>>
>>>> Built and ran tests from source zip.
>>>> Ran ExclamationTopology on local install set up from binary zip.
>>>> Verified no unexpected error logs.
>>>> Ran integration test locally.
>>>> Clicked around in UI for a bit, checked that logviewer works.
>>>> Ran the license check plugin, and verified that all dependency licenses
>>>> are
>>>> either category A or B.
>>>>
>>>> We have some category B dependencies, e.g. JAXB and Jersey under CDDL.
>>>> https://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#appropriately-labelled-condition
>>>> mentions that we should list category B dependencies somewhere visible to
>>>> users. Do we do this currently?
>>>>
>>>> Den fre. 22. mar. 2019 kl. 21.23 skrev P. Taylor Goetz <
>>>> ptgoetz@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc5)
>>>>>
>>>>> Full list of changes in this release:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>>>>>
>>>>> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v2.0.0:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=7e0a711e4ed5315f04f9f726caff61e0f169e320;hb=b5823809bd4b438e789a36f163f318d4b161ad13
>>>>>
>>>>> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/apache-storm-2.0.0-src.tar.gz
>>>>>
>>>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/
>>>>>
>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>>>>>
>>>>> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1076
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>>>>>
>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0
>>>>> [ ] 0 No opinion
>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Taylor
>>>>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC5
Posted by Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>.
Maybe something like this? https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2980
Den man. 25. mar. 2019 kl. 14.12 skrev Stig Rohde Døssing <
stigdoessing@gmail.com>:
> The ASF guideline says the file "should identify the third-party product,
> its licensing, and a url to the its homepage". If we can get away with
> including the license name and not the license text, I think
> THIRD-PARTY.txt contains what we need. E.g. Spark also only lists the
> license names, and not the texts.
>
> We can clean up the output a bit more, e.g. collapse all the Apache
> licenses together under one header, I just didn't bother because I didn't
> expect the file to be user facing.
>
> Den man. 25. mar. 2019 kl. 13.47 skrev Jungtaek Lim <ka...@gmail.com>:
>
>> According to how other projects are doing right now, looks like we are
>> not doing.
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/NOTICE-binary
>> https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/LICENSE-binary
>> https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/trunk/LICENSE
>>
>> If I understand correct, aether in storm-submit-tool is also EPL v1.0.
>>
>> Btw, I just ran the command "mvn generate-resources
>> -Dlicense.skipAggregateAddThirdParty=false" and see the output: the format
>> of output looks good though the output is a bit verbose. (Attached the
>> output file.)
>>
>> Would it be OK to include the file without cleaning up?
>>
>> 2019년 3월 25일 (월) 오후 8:19, Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>님이
>> 작성:
>>
>>> 0
>>>
>>> Built and ran tests from source zip.
>>> Ran ExclamationTopology on local install set up from binary zip.
>>> Verified no unexpected error logs.
>>> Ran integration test locally.
>>> Clicked around in UI for a bit, checked that logviewer works.
>>> Ran the license check plugin, and verified that all dependency licenses
>>> are
>>> either category A or B.
>>>
>>> We have some category B dependencies, e.g. JAXB and Jersey under CDDL.
>>> https://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#appropriately-labelled-condition
>>> mentions that we should list category B dependencies somewhere visible to
>>> users. Do we do this currently?
>>>
>>> Den fre. 22. mar. 2019 kl. 21.23 skrev P. Taylor Goetz <
>>> ptgoetz@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc5)
>>> >
>>> > Full list of changes in this release:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>>> >
>>> > The tag/commit to be voted upon is v2.0.0:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=7e0a711e4ed5315f04f9f726caff61e0f169e320;hb=b5823809bd4b438e789a36f163f318d4b161ad13
>>> >
>>> > The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/apache-storm-2.0.0-src.tar.gz
>>> >
>>> > Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>>> >
>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/
>>> >
>>> > The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>>> >
>>> > The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>>> >
>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1076
>>> >
>>> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0.
>>> >
>>> > When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>>> >
>>> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>> >
>>> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0
>>> > [ ] 0 No opinion
>>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>> >
>>> > Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>>> >
>>> > -Taylor
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC5
Posted by Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>.
The ASF guideline says the file "should identify the third-party product,
its licensing, and a url to the its homepage". If we can get away with
including the license name and not the license text, I think
THIRD-PARTY.txt contains what we need. E.g. Spark also only lists the
license names, and not the texts.
We can clean up the output a bit more, e.g. collapse all the Apache
licenses together under one header, I just didn't bother because I didn't
expect the file to be user facing.
Den man. 25. mar. 2019 kl. 13.47 skrev Jungtaek Lim <ka...@gmail.com>:
> According to how other projects are doing right now, looks like we are not
> doing.
>
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/NOTICE-binary
> https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/LICENSE-binary
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/trunk/LICENSE
>
> If I understand correct, aether in storm-submit-tool is also EPL v1.0.
>
> Btw, I just ran the command "mvn generate-resources
> -Dlicense.skipAggregateAddThirdParty=false" and see the output: the format
> of output looks good though the output is a bit verbose. (Attached the
> output file.)
>
> Would it be OK to include the file without cleaning up?
>
> 2019년 3월 25일 (월) 오후 8:19, Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>님이
> 작성:
>
>> 0
>>
>> Built and ran tests from source zip.
>> Ran ExclamationTopology on local install set up from binary zip.
>> Verified no unexpected error logs.
>> Ran integration test locally.
>> Clicked around in UI for a bit, checked that logviewer works.
>> Ran the license check plugin, and verified that all dependency licenses
>> are
>> either category A or B.
>>
>> We have some category B dependencies, e.g. JAXB and Jersey under CDDL.
>> https://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#appropriately-labelled-condition
>> mentions that we should list category B dependencies somewhere visible to
>> users. Do we do this currently?
>>
>> Den fre. 22. mar. 2019 kl. 21.23 skrev P. Taylor Goetz <ptgoetz@gmail.com
>> >:
>>
>> > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc5)
>> >
>> > Full list of changes in this release:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>> >
>> > The tag/commit to be voted upon is v2.0.0:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=7e0a711e4ed5315f04f9f726caff61e0f169e320;hb=b5823809bd4b438e789a36f163f318d4b161ad13
>> >
>> > The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/apache-storm-2.0.0-src.tar.gz
>> >
>> > Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>> >
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/
>> >
>> > The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>> >
>> > The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>> >
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1076
>> >
>> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0.
>> >
>> > When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>> >
>> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0
>> > [ ] 0 No opinion
>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>> >
>> > Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>> >
>> > -Taylor
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC5
Posted by Jungtaek Lim <ka...@gmail.com>.
According to how other projects are doing right now, looks like we are not
doing.
https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/NOTICE-binary
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/LICENSE-binary
https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/trunk/LICENSE
If I understand correct, aether in storm-submit-tool is also EPL v1.0.
Btw, I just ran the command "mvn generate-resources
-Dlicense.skipAggregateAddThirdParty=false" and see the output: the format
of output looks good though the output is a bit verbose. (Attached the
output file.)
Would it be OK to include the file without cleaning up?
2019년 3월 25일 (월) 오후 8:19, Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>님이 작성:
> 0
>
> Built and ran tests from source zip.
> Ran ExclamationTopology on local install set up from binary zip.
> Verified no unexpected error logs.
> Ran integration test locally.
> Clicked around in UI for a bit, checked that logviewer works.
> Ran the license check plugin, and verified that all dependency licenses are
> either category A or B.
>
> We have some category B dependencies, e.g. JAXB and Jersey under CDDL.
> https://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#appropriately-labelled-condition
> mentions that we should list category B dependencies somewhere visible to
> users. Do we do this currently?
>
> Den fre. 22. mar. 2019 kl. 21.23 skrev P. Taylor Goetz <ptgoetz@gmail.com
> >:
>
> > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc5)
> >
> > Full list of changes in this release:
> >
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/RELEASE_NOTES.html
> >
> > The tag/commit to be voted upon is v2.0.0:
> >
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=7e0a711e4ed5315f04f9f726caff61e0f169e320;hb=b5823809bd4b438e789a36f163f318d4b161ad13
> >
> > The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> >
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/apache-storm-2.0.0-src.tar.gz
> >
> > Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/
> >
> > The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> >
> > The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1076
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0.
> >
> > When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0
> > [ ] 0 No opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
> >
> > -Taylor
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC5
Posted by Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>.
0
Built and ran tests from source zip.
Ran ExclamationTopology on local install set up from binary zip.
Verified no unexpected error logs.
Ran integration test locally.
Clicked around in UI for a bit, checked that logviewer works.
Ran the license check plugin, and verified that all dependency licenses are
either category A or B.
We have some category B dependencies, e.g. JAXB and Jersey under CDDL.
https://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#appropriately-labelled-condition
mentions that we should list category B dependencies somewhere visible to
users. Do we do this currently?
Den fre. 22. mar. 2019 kl. 21.23 skrev P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>:
> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc5)
>
> Full list of changes in this release:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v2.0.0:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=7e0a711e4ed5315f04f9f726caff61e0f169e320;hb=b5823809bd4b438e789a36f163f318d4b161ad13
>
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/apache-storm-2.0.0-src.tar.gz
>
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/
>
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1076
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0.
>
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>
> -Taylor
[CANCELED] [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC5
Posted by "P. Taylor Goetz" <pt...@gmail.com>.
Canceling due to some license issues in this RC.
-Taylor
> On Mar 22, 2019, at 4:23 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc5)
>
> Full list of changes in this release:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/RELEASE_NOTES.html <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/RELEASE_NOTES.html>
>
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v2.0.0:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=7e0a711e4ed5315f04f9f726caff61e0f169e320;hb=b5823809bd4b438e789a36f163f318d4b161ad13 <https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=7e0a711e4ed5315f04f9f726caff61e0f169e320;hb=b5823809bd4b438e789a36f163f318d4b161ad13>
>
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/apache-storm-2.0.0-src.tar.gz <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/apache-storm-2.0.0-src.tar.gz>
>
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/ <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/>
>
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd <https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd>
>
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1076 <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1076>
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0.
>
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>
> -Taylor
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC5
Posted by Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>.
Thanks.
Den tir. 9. apr. 2019 kl. 19.21 skrev P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>:
> Cool. I’ll put one together tomorrow.
>
> -Taylor
>
> > On Apr 9, 2019, at 1:00 PM, Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Merged the PR. I think we follow the ASF guidelines more closely now.
> >
> > I probably won't backport it to 1.x, and I'm not sure it's necessary.
> After
> > looking at a few other Apache projects, it looks like it's pretty
> variable
> > how detailed the included license information is. If someone feels that
> it
> > should be backported, they should be able to do so by following the
> README
> > instructions added in the PR.
> >
> > I think we can try another RC.
> >
> > Den man. 8. apr. 2019 kl. 22.43 skrev Stig Rohde Døssing <
> > stigdoessing@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> See the first few responses in this thread, as well as this comment
> >> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2980#issuecomment-480514979, I
> tried
> >> to point to the relevant ASF guidelines there. We are missing a bit of
> text
> >> in NOTICE, we aren't including enough in LICENSE for the binary
> releases,
> >> and we aren't listing dependencies with category B licenses anywhere
> users
> >> are likely to see it.
> >>
> >> Den man. 8. apr. 2019 kl. 20.59 skrev Roshan Naik
> >> <ro...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
> >>
> >>> ?
> >>> On Wednesday, March 27, 2019, 4:39:33 PM PDT, Roshan Naik
> >>> <ro...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Will there be another RC or this one is good to continue with ?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wednesday, March 27, 2019, 9:41 AM, Derek Dagit <da...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> * Downloaded source ZIP, `mvn clean install`, all passed
> >>> * Verified signatures and checksums
> >>> * Packaged my build and ran a single-tenant (default) cluster
> >>> * Ran org.apache.storm.starter.WordCountTopology
> >>> * UI seemed OK, Visualization seemed OK, Logviewer seemed OK
> >>>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 3:23 PM P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc5)
> >>>>
> >>>> Full list of changes in this release:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/RELEASE_NOTES.html
> >>>>
> >>>> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v2.0.0:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=7e0a711e4ed5315f04f9f726caff61e0f169e320;hb=b5823809bd4b438e789a36f163f318d4b161ad13
> >>>>
> >>>> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/apache-storm-2.0.0-src.tar.gz
> >>>>
> >>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/
> >>>>
> >>>> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> >>>>
> >>>> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1076
> >>>>
> >>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0.
> >>>>
> >>>> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> >>>>
> >>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>>
> >>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0
> >>>> [ ] 0 No opinion
> >>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
> >>>>
> >>>> -Taylor
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC5
Posted by "P. Taylor Goetz" <pt...@gmail.com>.
Cool. I’ll put one together tomorrow.
-Taylor
> On Apr 9, 2019, at 1:00 PM, Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Merged the PR. I think we follow the ASF guidelines more closely now.
>
> I probably won't backport it to 1.x, and I'm not sure it's necessary. After
> looking at a few other Apache projects, it looks like it's pretty variable
> how detailed the included license information is. If someone feels that it
> should be backported, they should be able to do so by following the README
> instructions added in the PR.
>
> I think we can try another RC.
>
> Den man. 8. apr. 2019 kl. 22.43 skrev Stig Rohde Døssing <
> stigdoessing@gmail.com>:
>
>> See the first few responses in this thread, as well as this comment
>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2980#issuecomment-480514979, I tried
>> to point to the relevant ASF guidelines there. We are missing a bit of text
>> in NOTICE, we aren't including enough in LICENSE for the binary releases,
>> and we aren't listing dependencies with category B licenses anywhere users
>> are likely to see it.
>>
>> Den man. 8. apr. 2019 kl. 20.59 skrev Roshan Naik
>> <ro...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
>>
>>> ?
>>> On Wednesday, March 27, 2019, 4:39:33 PM PDT, Roshan Naik
>>> <ro...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>>
>>> Will there be another RC or this one is good to continue with ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, March 27, 2019, 9:41 AM, Derek Dagit <da...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> * Downloaded source ZIP, `mvn clean install`, all passed
>>> * Verified signatures and checksums
>>> * Packaged my build and ran a single-tenant (default) cluster
>>> * Ran org.apache.storm.starter.WordCountTopology
>>> * UI seemed OK, Visualization seemed OK, Logviewer seemed OK
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 3:23 PM P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc5)
>>>>
>>>> Full list of changes in this release:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>>>>
>>>> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v2.0.0:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=7e0a711e4ed5315f04f9f726caff61e0f169e320;hb=b5823809bd4b438e789a36f163f318d4b161ad13
>>>>
>>>> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/apache-storm-2.0.0-src.tar.gz
>>>>
>>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/
>>>>
>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>>>>
>>>> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1076
>>>>
>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0.
>>>>
>>>> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>>>>
>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0
>>>> [ ] 0 No opinion
>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>>>>
>>>> -Taylor
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC5
Posted by Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>.
Merged the PR. I think we follow the ASF guidelines more closely now.
I probably won't backport it to 1.x, and I'm not sure it's necessary. After
looking at a few other Apache projects, it looks like it's pretty variable
how detailed the included license information is. If someone feels that it
should be backported, they should be able to do so by following the README
instructions added in the PR.
I think we can try another RC.
Den man. 8. apr. 2019 kl. 22.43 skrev Stig Rohde Døssing <
stigdoessing@gmail.com>:
> See the first few responses in this thread, as well as this comment
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2980#issuecomment-480514979, I tried
> to point to the relevant ASF guidelines there. We are missing a bit of text
> in NOTICE, we aren't including enough in LICENSE for the binary releases,
> and we aren't listing dependencies with category B licenses anywhere users
> are likely to see it.
>
> Den man. 8. apr. 2019 kl. 20.59 skrev Roshan Naik
> <ro...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
>
>> ?
>> On Wednesday, March 27, 2019, 4:39:33 PM PDT, Roshan Naik
>> <ro...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>
>> Will there be another RC or this one is good to continue with ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, March 27, 2019, 9:41 AM, Derek Dagit <da...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> * Downloaded source ZIP, `mvn clean install`, all passed
>> * Verified signatures and checksums
>> * Packaged my build and ran a single-tenant (default) cluster
>> * Ran org.apache.storm.starter.WordCountTopology
>> * UI seemed OK, Visualization seemed OK, Logviewer seemed OK
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 3:23 PM P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc5)
>> >
>> > Full list of changes in this release:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>> >
>> > The tag/commit to be voted upon is v2.0.0:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=7e0a711e4ed5315f04f9f726caff61e0f169e320;hb=b5823809bd4b438e789a36f163f318d4b161ad13
>> >
>> > The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/apache-storm-2.0.0-src.tar.gz
>> >
>> > Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>> >
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/
>> >
>> > The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>> >
>> > The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>> >
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1076
>> >
>> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0.
>> >
>> > When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>> >
>> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0
>> > [ ] 0 No opinion
>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>> >
>> > Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>> >
>> > -Taylor
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC5
Posted by Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>.
See the first few responses in this thread, as well as this comment
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2980#issuecomment-480514979, I tried
to point to the relevant ASF guidelines there. We are missing a bit of text
in NOTICE, we aren't including enough in LICENSE for the binary releases,
and we aren't listing dependencies with category B licenses anywhere users
are likely to see it.
Den man. 8. apr. 2019 kl. 20.59 skrev Roshan Naik
<ro...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
> ?
> On Wednesday, March 27, 2019, 4:39:33 PM PDT, Roshan Naik
> <ro...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> Will there be another RC or this one is good to continue with ?
>
>
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
>
> On Wednesday, March 27, 2019, 9:41 AM, Derek Dagit <da...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> * Downloaded source ZIP, `mvn clean install`, all passed
> * Verified signatures and checksums
> * Packaged my build and ran a single-tenant (default) cluster
> * Ran org.apache.storm.starter.WordCountTopology
> * UI seemed OK, Visualization seemed OK, Logviewer seemed OK
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 3:23 PM P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc5)
> >
> > Full list of changes in this release:
> >
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/RELEASE_NOTES.html
> >
> > The tag/commit to be voted upon is v2.0.0:
> >
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=7e0a711e4ed5315f04f9f726caff61e0f169e320;hb=b5823809bd4b438e789a36f163f318d4b161ad13
> >
> > The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> >
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/apache-storm-2.0.0-src.tar.gz
> >
> > Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/
> >
> > The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> >
> > The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1076
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0.
> >
> > When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0
> > [ ] 0 No opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
> >
> > -Taylor
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC5
Posted by Roshan Naik <ro...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
?
On Wednesday, March 27, 2019, 4:39:33 PM PDT, Roshan Naik <ro...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
Will there be another RC or this one is good to continue with ?
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Wednesday, March 27, 2019, 9:41 AM, Derek Dagit <da...@apache.org> wrote:
* Downloaded source ZIP, `mvn clean install`, all passed
* Verified signatures and checksums
* Packaged my build and ran a single-tenant (default) cluster
* Ran org.apache.storm.starter.WordCountTopology
* UI seemed OK, Visualization seemed OK, Logviewer seemed OK
+1
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 3:23 PM P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc5)
>
> Full list of changes in this release:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v2.0.0:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=7e0a711e4ed5315f04f9f726caff61e0f169e320;hb=b5823809bd4b438e789a36f163f318d4b161ad13
>
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/apache-storm-2.0.0-src.tar.gz
>
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/
>
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1076
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0.
>
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>
> -Taylor
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC5
Posted by Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>.
I think this RC is dead due to potential license issues. If someone gets a
chance, please take a look at https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2980.
Den tor. 28. mar. 2019 kl. 00.39 skrev Roshan Naik
<ro...@yahoo.com.invalid>:
> Will there be another RC or this one is good to continue with ?
>
>
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
>
> On Wednesday, March 27, 2019, 9:41 AM, Derek Dagit <da...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> * Downloaded source ZIP, `mvn clean install`, all passed
> * Verified signatures and checksums
> * Packaged my build and ran a single-tenant (default) cluster
> * Ran org.apache.storm.starter.WordCountTopology
> * UI seemed OK, Visualization seemed OK, Logviewer seemed OK
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 3:23 PM P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc5)
> >
> > Full list of changes in this release:
> >
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/RELEASE_NOTES.html
> >
> > The tag/commit to be voted upon is v2.0.0:
> >
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=7e0a711e4ed5315f04f9f726caff61e0f169e320;hb=b5823809bd4b438e789a36f163f318d4b161ad13
> >
> > The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> >
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/apache-storm-2.0.0-src.tar.gz
> >
> > Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/
> >
> > The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> >
> > The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1076
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0.
> >
> > When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0
> > [ ] 0 No opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
> >
> > -Taylor
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC5
Posted by Roshan Naik <ro...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Will there be another RC or this one is good to continue with ?
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Wednesday, March 27, 2019, 9:41 AM, Derek Dagit <da...@apache.org> wrote:
* Downloaded source ZIP, `mvn clean install`, all passed
* Verified signatures and checksums
* Packaged my build and ran a single-tenant (default) cluster
* Ran org.apache.storm.starter.WordCountTopology
* UI seemed OK, Visualization seemed OK, Logviewer seemed OK
+1
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 3:23 PM P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc5)
>
> Full list of changes in this release:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v2.0.0:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=7e0a711e4ed5315f04f9f726caff61e0f169e320;hb=b5823809bd4b438e789a36f163f318d4b161ad13
>
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/apache-storm-2.0.0-src.tar.gz
>
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/
>
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1076
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0.
>
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>
> -Taylor
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC5
Posted by Derek Dagit <da...@apache.org>.
* Downloaded source ZIP, `mvn clean install`, all passed
* Verified signatures and checksums
* Packaged my build and ran a single-tenant (default) cluster
* Ran org.apache.storm.starter.WordCountTopology
* UI seemed OK, Visualization seemed OK, Logviewer seemed OK
+1
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 3:23 PM P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc5)
>
> Full list of changes in this release:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v2.0.0:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=7e0a711e4ed5315f04f9f726caff61e0f169e320;hb=b5823809bd4b438e789a36f163f318d4b161ad13
>
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/apache-storm-2.0.0-src.tar.gz
>
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc5/
>
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1076
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0.
>
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>
> -Taylor