You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@kylin.apache.org by " Kaige Liu (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/01/25 12:50:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (KYLIN-3196) Replace StringUtils.containsOnly with Regex

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KYLIN-3196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16339173#comment-16339173 ] 

 Kaige Liu commented on KYLIN-3196:
-----------------------------------

Patch attached. [~lidong_sjtu] Please help review. Thanks.

> Replace StringUtils.containsOnly with Regex
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KYLIN-3196
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KYLIN-3196
>             Project: Kylin
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: REST Service
>            Reporter:  Kaige Liu
>            Assignee:  Kaige Liu
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: v2.3.0
>
>         Attachments: KYLIN-3196-replace-containsOnly-00001.patch
>
>
> Notice that we use StringUtils.contains to validate project/cube/model names. It's not high efficiency and elegant.
>  
> I did a small test:
> {code:java}
> public class TempTest {
>     Pattern r = Pattern.compile("^[a-zA-Z0-9_]*$");
>     @Test
>     public void test() {
>         final char[] VALID_MODELNAME = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ1234567890_".toCharArray();
>         String s1 = "abc@";
>         System.out.println("Call StringUtils.containsOnly 100 times");
>         long start = System.nanoTime();
>         for(int i =0; i<100; ++i) {
>             StringUtils.containsOnly(s1, VALID_MODELNAME);
>         }
>         long end = System.nanoTime();
>         System.out.println(end - start);
>         System.out.println("Call Regex match 100 times");
>         start = System.nanoTime();
>         for(int i =0; i<100; ++i) {
>             containsByRegex(s1);
>         }
>         end = System.nanoTime();
>         System.out.println(end - start);
>     }
>     private boolean containsByRegex(final String s) {
>         Matcher matcher = r.matcher(s);
>         return matcher.find();
>     }
> }{code}
> The result shows:
> {code:java}
> Call StringUtils.containsOnly 100 times
> 4740997
> Call Regex match 100 times
> 753182
> {code}
>  
> Conclusion:
> Regex is better than StringUtils.containsOnly



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)